john_wither

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@toorudeCC @yeksoFinattirB It’s ruled a school related event, even after, he still in the capacity as coach. School related event is no different then school. As in the same rules apply at the event as school. So the SC has ruled that prayer can occur in school events and therefore school.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@filosophy424 @SCOTUSblog The case was about the state specifically excluding private religious schools. Private schools in general got tax payer funding, but the state excluded any private religious schools, which fundamentally discriminates against an instruction due to religion.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@texrex96 @407Volfan4life @filosophy424 @SCOTUSblog The Maine ruling is about not giving religious private schools tax dollars. Private schools in Maine, in general get tax dollars. The argument was whether the state could specifically exclude private religious schools. Which fundamentally discriminated against religion.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@BiddenJill @7News They weren’t put in any position. If he continued praying in the locker room, then I could see your point, but it was after the game, on the field, and he didn’t ask anyone to join. They voluntarily joined.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@BiddenJill @7News Not really though. I don’t think religion has a place in school, but he went and kneeled on the field after the game. He didn’t ask others to join, he didn’t force them to. There was no pressure for any players to join, it was completely there choice.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@mrdn @MenckenWasRight @EdwardJHiggins @IlhanMN @riden_biden Them saying it’s precedent isn’t tantamount to saying they’d uphold the precedent or if it was precedent with quality reasoning.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@mrdn @MenckenWasRight @EdwardJHiggins @IlhanMN @riden_biden Which as they pointed out is precedent that they’ll consider when cases come up, but not that it was correct or incorrect precedent, nor how they would vote on it. It’s not misleading, it’s an objective way of answer the question, which is the way it’s supposed to be.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@Stalin20086365 @randomfella @pradeep48912268 @mcuban Pharma industry completely takes advantage of the fact that people NEED medication and have to pay out the ridiculous amounts of money. It’s nothing more than greed. Mark cubans pharmacy proves it. It’s not necessary to have the ridiculous mark ups,it’s a choice made out of greed

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@Stalin20086365 @randomfella @pradeep48912268 @mcuban Sp in other words they’re price gouging? Why do there need to be hundreds of percent in markups? Take something simple like insulin. Costs $2-3 to make per unit, but a current standard unit is $111 to buy. How can that be explained other than price gouging?

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@wishcraft8121 @davenotsomello @del_griffth @egghead0077 @nf_0210 @heyykayadams @stoolpresidente Study from 92’ shows .02% of abortions occur at 26 weeks and later. Viability of the fetus occurs somewhere between 23-24 weeks. So in other words people want to stop abortion since it kills “viable babies”. Even though roughly 98-99% of abortions occur before fetus viability.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@wishcraft8121 @davenotsomello @del_griffth @egghead0077 @nf_0210 @heyykayadams @stoolpresidente Stats show that less than 1% of abortions occur at 21 weeks or later. 91% at 13 weeks or less. Those 1% do tend to be out of the mothers safety or a serious health condition.
https://t.co/940CsXiRUN

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@MZHemingway @stoolpresidente Allowing people to suffer because “prolife” is more important is idiotic. There comes a point when people need to realize how much suffering goes on in America, and adding more unwanted children into the mix will make it that much worse.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@Vashinort13 @JJohnsonIsBae @Plz_Relax_ Lol it’s just about the use of cursing. Tweeting fuck you in response to someone always has the warning message.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@sweetpetemarago @HeidiNCloset Sure

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@sfg_carol @PATSenaluck @NikolasMokalis @TJNeumann1 @GavinNewsom 🤦 did you even read the opinions? Do you even know why they are in favor of overruling? Did you read either the Roe or Casey rulings? You seem to lack an understanding of why it was really overruled. Roe was poorly reasoned to begin with, and that’s a common opinion.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@Le__Joo @BearfootCowboy @jackie1028_ Yes there are factors that are considered when applying stare decisis. Some of those factors are workability, precedent reasoning, intervening events, etc…
When applying stare decisis the court deemed the precedent as poorly reasoned.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@melbacoast There is such thing as bad precedent. Settled law is just binding precedent. But if the precedent is bad, in the opinion of the judge, sue to being unworkable or badly reasoned then they don’t follow it. That’s why it’s not lying under oath.

[john_wither @johnwither8]

@melbacoast they would’ve voted nor whether or not they though the precedent was correct. So there was no lying under oath. Lying under oath would be them saying they would not overrule Roe, which none of them said.