@PhDniX Thank you for the explanation. Just to improve my understanding, can you give me some references discuss this issue, i mean discuss which isnad is confincing and others are not?
@PhDniX Can I rephrase that "it is possible the isnad is not back to the prophet"?
My second question, what is the proof that the sanad is genuine(for whom think it is genuine)? Is it possible that the sanad is just a guess from later generation?
@PhDniX Sorry If it's felt impressionistic, i'm not a scholar and just use the word sharp. It's just to think a possibility that the isnad is made from a guess in later generation.
@PhDniX But from that it can be drawn that both study in a same community. And if we accept your proposal that quran is without i'rab, the qiraat must be from the era of the int oduction of i'rab. So, the isnad should be not consistent with the fact.
@PhDniX But what the isnads mean, then. May be I just miss your twits explain it. It's not easy to accept that they are from the prophet. It's easy to imagine that all of them just judgment from qura'.
@PhDniX I put my question here. About lam taukid but written as la nafi, you said in your book that there is no effort yet to survey the difference between QCE and early manuscripts about it. After a half year is there the survey done? Thanks.
@EnomKami@poponkerok @ParaWarganet @wwwWINNERrrr@comika_id Kenapa layak dibenci sih, @poponkerok ? Salahnya di mana? Kita yg hetero kelon enaknya sama lawan jenis, kalau mereka yg gay enaknya kelon sesama jenis, kan sebenarnya kita dan mereka nggak beda: kelon dgn yg kita suka.
@PhDniX It interesting that the number of alahruf almuqatha'ah is 14, is it close to right to say that they represent these 15 letters? Why letter "dal" is not in the 14 alahruf almuqatha'ah? It has been represented by "ra"?
@PhDniX Sorry, i ask here. Just to check my understanding, if quran is read without i'rab, the basmalah can be read as: bismillah arrahmฤn arrahฤซm. Is my understanding is right?