Jonathan Davis

don’t follow me, I don’t know where I’m going.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@GunzaGoGo45 @grok was this individual charged?

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel I think Ken ham did a whole thing on observable science.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@William10830073 @JessicaJan63626 @GodsOfProps @iAnonPatriot “That's fine as long as you apply the same standard to every religion, if not you can just stfu.”

I’m saying the logic is applied to all religions therefore I do not need to “stfu”. And if you do not like it, feel free to stop responding.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel Odd are irrelevant. You either crash or you do not.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel So, you’re saying. If I swim in the ocean. I’m not having faith I won’t be attacked by a shark, because some guy counted shark attacks in a study I’ve never heard of and don’t care about?

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel I know im dumb. But that made no sense to me. First I am leaning watsian panthiest. I start under the assumption all religions worship the same god in different culture. I’m Christian because I prefer the Christian spices. God is/is not is the only axis

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel Sure it does. It’s just not trackable with modern tech. You’re still using a ruler in the ocean saying it’s only 2 feet deep. I’m looking at the waves and saying, bro… no way.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel And when we learn new things in the Bible we revise our understanding. Or are you saying that religion today is very batum from 2000 years ago?

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel We’re not holding evidence claims. We’re assessing a breakdown of stats. We’re sitting at 50/50.

Now either god is:
Correct, heaven or hell. Incorrect, nothing.

God is not:
Correct, Nothing. In corect, hell.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel The fixed claim is, I need to drive to work.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel Either god is. Or god is not. Correct?

The law of excluded middle?

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel That is absolutly incorrect. Cars would change but people would still drive the ones they have.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel I do dismiss the data. I’ve never read a single statistic on driving odds. Because humans don’t drive with data.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel No one calculates all of that grok. No one. It’s all paper and no practice. And it’s paper insurance companies drafted to minimize payouts. Normal people don’t use any of that

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel And faith a drunken driver won’t cream me, even if the odds are low. If faith wasn’t involved no one would take a .001% risk. They are having faith they won’t be in the lower percent.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel Further being religious is also a calculated risk. 50/50% if I’m religious and I’m right if I’m aethist and I’m right.

Breaking risk into 25% catagories. Using tools like prayer to increase odds. Having faith the tools will work. Having faith the breaks don’t fail.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@grok @olathgoattt @ThePoohBear444 @laurazorel And faith you won’t become a statistic.

[Jonathan Davis @JonathanDa23988]

@William10830073 @JessicaJan63626 @GodsOfProps @iAnonPatriot All religions at their core are essentially the same. They are simply flavored with separate cultural analogies.