4eyedDawg

TTU alum

[Victor Davis Hanson @VDHanson]

Dr Fauci and Mr. Science

The Fauci files reveal not just a sociopathic narcissist, but also a pathological schizophrenic.

For years, Fauci was assuring the public of Covid narratives that he either knew were untrue, or knew little about.

He posed as a non-partisan, even as he collaborated with the leftwing cable news grandees and liberal columnists to hound his enemies and magnify his godhead.

From the virus’s origins and effects of the lockdowns, to the efficacy of the mRNA vaccinations to the always changing 0/1/2 masks wearing protocols, Fauci used his massive government agency, and sycophantic media, to promote his always fluid narratives by punishing enemies and rewarding friends—on the basis of their loyalty to Dr. “I represent science”.

He seemed to be obsessed with firing White House Covid advisor Scott Atlas, and demonizing Jay Bhattacharya, Sunetra Gupta and Martin Kulldorff—for the crimes of questioning the Fauci party line.

These critics were not radical “let it rip” herd immunologists as the Fauci camp caricatured them, but circumspect, cost-to-benefit doctors and savvy health policy analysts.

Their views, if embraced, might have avoided a multibillion-dollar global shutdown that wrecked economies—especially derailing the booming 4th quarter 2019 Trump economy—increased the death toll, destroyed millions of livelihoods, harmed perhaps permanently the education of millions U.S. children, and was hardly based on the “science”.

And what exactly were the so-called extremist views of Atlas, Bhattacharya, and others?

Healthy children were not at great risk from Covid—but keeping them isolated drained away key resources from the elderly and sick who certainly were vulnerable.

And the nationwide school closures had profound negative effects on children and teens as did the lockdowns on the general population.

Substance and familial abuse soared, small businesses were ruined, and children’s formative educational years were lost.

24/7 mask wearing was neither practical nor necessary as opposed to their beneficial use by health care workers in close proximities.

The experimental mRNA vaccinations may have initially saved lives, but they were not, as billed by Fauci and the pharmaceutical companies, lasting protection from either infectiousness or being infected.

And certainly the repeated booster regimens for some could pose serious health risks.

Herd immunity was not some crank idea, as the Fauci school libeled these experts, but, along with the initial vaccinations, were time-tested medical realities that would mitigate the toxicity of the pandemic.

We have seen a lot of obscene hoaxes recently that changed national events: the loony Jussie Smollett caper; the phony “Steele dossier”; the “51 intelligence authorities” and the Russian-produced Hunter Biden laptop con; and the media fabricated effigy of Joe Biden as “fit as a fiddle”.

But Fauci’s effort to attribute the virus to a bat or pangolin publicly, while privately accepting from his own consultants that it likely was birthed in the Wuhan lab’s gain of function research—which he had helped to support via Peter Daszak—and the policies that resulted from that initial lie, proved literally for thousands a matter of life and death.

[Eric Weinstein @ericweinstein]

Those of us bitterly opposed to communism fall into two different groups.

A) Those who argue that it must be abandoned because it has show us that it doesn’t work.

B) Those of us that are so bitterly opposed to collectivism applied to dissenting individuals that we are relieved that it *cannot* work. A happy accident. Those who don’t care if it *could* be made to work: we’d continue to fight it. Working or not working is irrelevant. It’s just bad. Period. The end.

If Communism could actually be shown to deliver stable high levels of growth and innovation, broadly distributed, with low inequality,
I believe I would still fight it to my dying breath.

My opposition to communism has little to nothing to do with the fact that it doesn’t work as an economic system. So, it’s merely a relief that it doesn’t work. A convenience for its opposition.

Communism and collectivism are intrinsically soul killing for people who are hyper-individualistic . So let’s stop hiding behind the fact that they don’t work as economic or governance systems.

Some of us who aren’t the biggest fans of naked capitalism red of tooth and claw, hate communism not because we think capitalism is intrinsically fair. It isn’t. We oppose it because communism hunts the individual.

For us, It’s not communism vs capitalism. That is a businessman’s argument. Instead, it’s communism vs individualism for me. Show me a system that fights harder to let a dissenting individual thrive more than brutal market capitalism (which also barely works), and I am all ears.

Not everything is a market after all.

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@RachelBitecofer @JackPosobiec What year did the assault occur?

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@RachelBitecofer Why do yall hate data so much?
Being dataphobic is not a good look

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@Brett_McMurphy IMHO FBS should do it exactly the way FCS does it.

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@RachelBitecofer Is this before or after the $200 bbl. oil?

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Je suis MDR.

On est vraiment en train d’assister à la fin d’un monde et du mensonge de la gauche institutionnelle moralisatrice et complètement déconnectée des réalités.

Cette PLS galactique 😂😂😂

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@RachelBitecofer Are you Dataphobic?

[Jesse Livermore @Jesse_Livermore]

Trump got a 2nd term b/c the American people concluded he was the only way they could protect themselves from the insanity that regularly comes out of the Democratic party. With the DSA takeover, we're seeing that their fears were justified.

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@RachelBitecofer @Dave_Eby Like what?

[unseen1 @unseen1_unseen]

I'm still amazed that the anti tariff people, including the scotus, gave Trump the weapon to impose long lasting tariffs that will be almost impossible for the anti tariff people to roll back, politically speaking.

All they had to do was accept the results of the election, allow Trump's trade policy of a global tariff to be implemented for his 4 years in office and if they were correct and it led to a crashing economy then change them in 2029.

That's it.

Instead, they fought him tooth and nail to defeat his liberation day tariffs and by doing so allowed him time to implement his real trade policies out of the media's spotlight.

After the scotus ruled against the IEEPA tariffs, the anti tariff people declared victroy and from all appearances abandoned the fight.

Meanwhile, immediately following the ruling Trump imposed basically the same worldwide tariff scheme of 10% using section 122 of the 1974 law (strange we havent heard about that endlessly from the media over the last 5 months)and started the longer process to impose the much tougher section 301 duties.

Now the section 122 tariffs are set to expire Friday and the section 301 tariffs are lock and loaded to replace them as soon as they do.

The 301 tariffs are a much tougher animal to defeat. The cause they cite for the tariffs is forced labor issues.

The USTR has proposed tariffs on more than 60 countries that covers about 99% of our trade. In other words, the new stronger tariffs will be about a 12.5% worldwide tariff as far as the US is concerned.

This is higher than the current 10% tariff.

Going forward, I can't wait for the anti tariff people to try to repeal these tariffs and admit they want slave labor and to sell that argument politically.

This whole saga is shaping up to be yet another epic backfire by the TDS group.

[David Burge @iowahawkblog]

Personally if I were a downwardly mobile loser kid of insane wealth I would blow the family fortune on yachts, private jets, drugs, gambling, and expensive supermodel whores, instead of grad school and entourages of smelly commie idiots

[Bill Melugin @BillMelugin_]

BREAKING: @SenRandPaul, the Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, has just released internal federal documents which he says show that the FBI intervened and stopped CBP from searching and questioning Peter Daszak upon his return to the US from China at JFK airport in 2021 during the WHO's investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The documents show that CBP's National Targeting Center had flagged Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance, as an "extremely high person of interest" ahead of his arrival in the US, citing his more than 15 years of collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and his role as principal investigator on NIH grants funding bat coronavirus research in China, and that "much of the funding DASZAK receives is put towards gain of function research."

The documents reveal that CBP had a series of questions they planned to ask Daszak when he landed and were going to search his media, until they were told to stand down by the FBI.

In an email dated 2/4/2021, a CBP official notifies others within CBP:

"Please be advised that FBI New York has requested we do not stop the subject below."

Chairman Paul says as a result, the stop, search, and questioning of Daszak never happened.

[Will Chamberlain @willchamberlain]

Really something how the entire third-worldist DSA clique is talking about abolishing the Senate, but the moment you suggest denaturalizing and deporting them they suddenly become ardent defenders of the Constitution

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@Alexoo4 @jackunheard How exactly?

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@therandomsec Peyton Manning

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@BrooksAustinBA Look at the way FCS does it
That's the way

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@BrooksAustinBA Yes 24
Use the FCS model and be done sooner and it makes sense

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@ElvisSinosickk I'm 60 and it sucks

[4eyedDawg @JonBonJokey]

@RachelBitecofer @billmaher You should become a millionaire