Jon Webster

Colorado Dad, family, fishing, hunting, reading, cooking.

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@RobertoMorris @KirtB_6 Taylor Swift is a billionaire

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@mariathies12

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@OwenBenjamin My brother in Christ, you sound like a bitch right now.

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@celestialbe1ng

[CaliRN619 🚑🩺🚑 @CaliRN619]

Lindsay Clancy did not plan her children’s murders the day she did it.

She started laying the groundwork for a trial 5 months prior. How do I know? The evidence is clear if you look through a nurse’s eyes.

As an RN, the first thing we’re taught is that “if you didn’t document it, it didn’t happen” in regards to patient care. Lindsay was an L&D nurse. She heard that line in school and on every unit she ever worked.

Callan was only a few months old when she began “seeking treatment”. She told doctors she was depressed and anxious. She did not tell them she was suicidal or homicidal. She knew exactly what those words do. One statement of intent to harm herself or the kids and she is in a locked unit. If they even suspected she wanted to hurt anyone, it would have unleashed a chain reaction that would prevent her from completing her plan. She wanted freedom and she knew just what lines not to cross to reach that goal.

What she did do was write it down. Diary entries. Texts. Conversations with her husband and her mother. Thoughts of harming herself and the children. That paper trail exists for a reason. It is the documentation she knew a future jury would see.

For months the pattern held: disclose the dark thoughts to family and to a journal. Minimize or deny them to the people who could actually help.

Cycle through providers. We call that “doctor shopping” in the medical world and it’s a clear indicator of someone who wants specific medicines or is trying to avoid coordination between doctors. She KNEW the system and exactly how to use it.

Collect prescriptions. Zoloft, Prozac, Seroquel, Valium, Klonopin, Ativan, Lamictal, amitriptyline—thirteen medications, more than thirty prescriptions. A nurse knows which side effects to report to get a med changed or dose adjusted. The list itself became the evidence she wanted. We don’t know if she ever took any of them except on the day of the crime.

As a mom, if I were having actual thoughts of hurting my kids, I’d be the first one screaming it to every doctor, every nurse. I’d make sure I was locked away where I couldn’t actually hurt them. But not Lindsay. She did all she could to not be locked away.

When the Women & Infants postpartum program discharged her after one day because she didn’t fit the criteria, the calendar was not on her side. Callan was eight months old. The cleanest “postpartum psychosis” window was already gone. She had to execute sooner rather than later.

She planned it to the minute. As a nurse, she knew exactly how long it would take to strangle each child—about six minutes. She sent her husband on errands that would keep him out of the house long enough to kill all three and stage what was supposed to look like a suicide attempt.

Her medical education ensured she knew EXACTLY how deep and what direction to cut her wrists to ensure she wouldn’t bleed out. She knew EXACTLY how deep and where to cut her neck to avoid hitting the carotid arteries, the jugular veins, or compromise her airway. She even knew jumping out a 2nd story window wouldn’t be fatal but would look dramatic to a future jury. Every cut, every decision was calculated, cold, and with the medical training to execute the plan flawlessly (the injuries she sustained were a miscalculation from landing wrong, not the fall itself).

Lindsay Clancy is not a woman who “snapped with no warning.” or even one who was failed by her family and the healthcare system. She is a woman who spent months building a file and setting the stage so she could blame her crime on those very people while she could live out the childless life she dreamed of living.

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@Alec_Zeck Because she wasn’t taking the drugs. She shopped for em as a plan to make it look like she was over medicated. And a bunch of people fell for it

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@MarktMatts

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@____Holly_ The focus should ONLY be on justice for the 3 children that were murdered.

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@TRHLofficial Yes

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@MentallyNathan @SteveDeaceShow 11 out 12 jurors were fine with avoiding justice for murdering her 3 children.

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@iKoalaWala @NickJFreitas

[Joseph Younis, MD @YounisJoseph]

I avoided commenting on the Lindsay Clancy trial because its nuanced and emotional but the implications are enormous so I am going to say something now. A lot of people are calling that one juror who wouldn't join the other eleven irrational. But, that juror is probably the only one asking the right questions imo: where is the evidence that she lacked the capacity to know it was wrong or to stop herself? And, maybe, where do we draw the line on what an ostensibly insane person is allowed to do when the doubt the defense manufactured rests on nothing in the record before the killings? It seems that the entirety of the defense position rests on improbable probabilities and that's a low bar for such a heinous act.

1. Postpartum psychosis is rare, and almost always happens in the first 4 weeks. The idea that some psychiatrists extend the postpartum window to a year is true, but for depression and anxiety. The evidence isn't strong for psychosis, and its latching on to improbability

2. The strongest risk factor for postpartum psychosis is preexisting bipolar disorder or a prior psychotic episode. She had neither before her third child. The real time evidence from her doctors/providers indicate this. The bipolar label that showed up was after significant polypharmacy, and any good psychiatrist will tell you that you cannot diagnose primary disease when multiple drugs could be offending agents. Drug-induced psychosis would show better temporal correlations with her medications and should be a mitigation argument at sentencing. Again, very improbable alignment

3. The proxy for intent is planning, and she clearly planned... she sent her husband to some restaurant they don't normally go to, checked the drive time, texted a specific order at 5:07 pm... she killed her children in sequence. That's demonstrating real time decision making. I don't understand how they circumvented this. Again, very improbable that she was able to make decisions up until it becomes a liability

4. This idea of a "voice" that commanded her is so post-hoc as a defense. The ltierature on command hallucinations show most people don't obey them and the compliance occurs when the voice is familiar. This was a first time voice she only ever reported 2 weeks after killing her kids. And this first time voice asked her to... kill all her children AND she listened to this unfamiliar voice? Again... very improbable

The improbability is so stark that it's almost undeniably a sympathy verdict from the jurors conflated with a misunderstanding of postpartum disease. The easiest way to demonstrate this is to take a father with the same chart, months of documented depression, insomnia, suicidal ideation but no psychosis then strangles his kids after arranging for his wife to be away from the house. 100% guilty.

Everyone knows postpartum disease is real and important. Everyone knows she's sick and needed help, possibly much better management. You can even argue she is insane. What I see to be the most important is where we draw the line of what we allow under the "insanity" rule. Massachusetts forces a binary verdict of guilty or not criminally responsible but this is a case for the third that other states have and which is guilty but mentally ill. We have a responsibility to speak for the unheard voices of these children and future children and say we draw the line at murdering children.

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@SteveDeaceShow Also, men need to exchange their fantasy football rosters for lists of public office positions where women are running or hold. If there is a woman running even if she is a conservative, I’ve seen enough “conservative” women on here make excuses for the demon as well.

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@CathyYoung63 @OldHerkDriver Why reward a multiple child murderer with life?

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@JessCarrier9 @TheOfficerTatum No, only dumb people would find any of this as reasonable doubt.

[Nick Freitas @NickJFreitas]

Angry women in my feed: “Men commit more murders!!!”

A. The point is not only the murder but the SUPPORT you are giving the murderer.

And

B.
-Murders: 14,085 (2025)
-Abortions: 1,126,000 (2025)

When you call ours murder and yours “healthcare” it really skews the stats.

[Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre]

A lot of conservative commentators and pastors attempt to carve out a safe path through the gender discourse by claiming that any bad behavior from women is ultimately a failure of male leadership

The power of this argument is that it's true, in healthy patriarchal societies the male head of the house was responsible for the behavior of his wife and daughters, but the reason is they were not considered to have full agency so the male head was granted authority over them

If a women defied her husband, society sided against her, if a daughter spurned her father she was looked down upon as disgraceful, the man had the responsibility to lead but the women had the responsibility to follow

The modern conservative solution has been to assign all the responsibility to men without granting them any authority, they are just supposed to lead without any social reinforcement or lawful authority

Men are taught that they should lead, but women are not taught that they should follow

Men are taught they're responsible for everything, even things they can't control because society stripped them of that authority, but women are told that they're never responsible for anything even when society has given them all the authority

We can see this reflected in the Lindsay Clancy case, but honestly we can see it reflected in most pulpits and conservative podcasts just as clearly

The two sexes must get along, no one should be stoking gender wars for clicks or attention, the future of our society depends on this

But it also depends on conservatives deciding what they really believe about gender diffrences

Are women the same as men from the neck up, with the same level of agency and responsibility?

Or are men and women different beyond their sex organs? Are men really responsible for the behavior of women?

We have to choose one or the other, because this idea that women are independent and capable of full agency, but also men are responsible for all bad female behavior can't survivie

Young men will just listen to the Andrew Tates of the world because you have nothing to offer them

[Steve Deace @SteveDeaceShow]

This is the biggest story not enough have noticed and are discussing. When @jeffreytucker dropped this on me live during yesterday's show, I was gobsmacked. Because the potential ramifications of this are astounding. Here are just two of the potential ramifications:

1) They tried to knowingly keep us locked down longer precisely to prolong the suffering by purposefully stifling the path to herd immunity all the more.

2) The introduction of the toxic genetic serums not only prolonged the suffering but made it worse. Or as @RMConservative describes it, "The more you inject the more you infect."

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@DrJosefWD Avoided the question. Would you feel the same if she murdered your children?

[Jon Webster @jonjonweb85]

@Cryptogally @conservmillen Because it’s dumb to hear the evidence and come to this conclusion. And dumb is being kind.