@BraxM@Slothknockers@RadioTimes These are not the real Douglas and Florence. Thompson wrote and narrated alternative English versions to the ready made original French show.
It is very worrying that new UK tech minister Liz Kendall is bringing in an adviser who has
- said AI companies will never compensate creatives
- echoed big tech’s calls for copyright reform
- echoed big tech’s false claims that UK copyright law is ‘uncertain’ and therefore needs clarifying
Why is this government so set on throwing creatives under the bus to benefit AI companies?
https://t.co/HZIX33nKOv
"AI cannot 'create' without our music. We never consented to having our music used to build a multi-billion dollar technology. We have not been asked, we have not been paid, but we have been robbed, disrespected and mocked by rich technocrats. This fight is bigger than music."
- @djpain1, one of the independent musicians suing AI music companies Suno & Udio
How is this acceptable, @WeTransfer? You’re not a free service, I *pay* you to shift my big artwork files.
I DON’T pay you to have the right to use them to train AI or print, sell and distribute my artwork and set yourself up as a commercial rival to me, using my own work.😡
Incredibly important report on AI training & copyright released today by the European Commission. It gets lots right, slamming the idea that creators should be required to opt-out of having their works used for free by AI companies.
It says:
- Generative AI must be based on opt-in consent
- Current EU law does *not* permit generative AI training on copyrighted work without a license. Some claim Article 4 of the CDSM does, but this view is mistaken.
- Requiring creators to opt-out or have their work trained on for free would be unfair and contravene international law
- AI systems don't learn like humans, from a technical or legal perspective
It suggests a solution of a statutory exception for AI training with an unwaivable right of equitable remuneration for authors and rights holders. I'm not sure this is the right solution - but it's great to see the Commission coming out so strongly in favour of respecting creators' rights, and making it clear that tech companies' dreams of unpaid use of copyrighted works cannot be permitted.
Read the full report here: https://t.co/Ven7SotzxE
On a recent panel, we were asked whether AI companies, if they replace jobs with AGI, will distribute their profits among the public, giving us all more time to be creative.
I said no: these companies are already exploiting people. Why would that change?
My full response:
Guess what happens when you mess with a retired audit partner at PWC?
You get your ass handed to you on a plate, wouldn't that be right @YorkshireWater.
All hail Stanley Root ladies and gentlemen. 👏👏👏
We should all thank Baroness Kidron and the large majority of the Lords who voted 5 times to protect creators by requiring AI companies to reveal their training data.
We should also condemn the @UKLabour government for 5 times refusing that request.
If you’re in the UK and you ever find yourself wondering why AI companies can get away with illegally using your work behind closed doors, the answer is now simple: the government refused to force them to do otherwise. There is no other reason.