jonathan wright

Scientist in Grenoble,
@[email protected]

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

The great migration begins? Hope to see you all there:
@[email protected]

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@MacchiPiero @Robert_Palgrave @esvenssongrape @CakBakti @MikeGlazer1 Yes, and the agreement between theory and experiments is often magical.

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@MikeGlazer1 Based on the responses you are getting here, we would benefit from an update to the definition of "lattice" so that it properly describes common usage.

That is going to be difficult to write!

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@MacchiPiero @Robert_Palgrave @esvenssongrape @CakBakti @MikeGlazer1 Piero, when you wrote: "which means the electron density averaged over all possible vibrational eigenmodes of the lattice"

What is vibrating? You meant the physical crystal lattice, right?

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@MacchiPiero @Robert_Palgrave @esvenssongrape @CakBakti @MikeGlazer1 In the context below, I thought @MikeGlazer1 refers to a physical sublattice. How could the mathematical one be polarised?

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@MikeGlazer1 @Robert_Palgrave @MacchiPiero @esvenssongrape @CakBakti What is a lattice mode @MikeGlazer1?

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@Robert_Palgrave @esvenssongrape @CakBakti @MikeGlazer1 It's a descriptive vs proscriptive view of language (https://t.co/3UAI9dXeiG). "Lattice" is understood by native English speakers in the broader descriptive sense.

[Hamid Abdolvand @AbdolvandHamid]

Hello everyone,
We have multiple postdoc and PhD positions available in the area of advanced nuclear fuels. Please see the following links for more details. If you know anyone who might be interested, please let them know.
PDF-1: https://t.co/s2tsjPlad4
https://t.co/y0Ob0hPbfy

[Daniel Lemire @lemire]

Your code could be nicer. You could have adopted better conventions. There is probably a lot of code that you don't need.

However, your users only care about what your code can do, whether it can do it correctly and whether it can do it efficiently.

Focus on these three: features, correctness and efficiency.

The rest is shallow and vain.

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

See you soon ! @SoM_esrf

[European Synchrotron @esrfsynchrotron]

See you at 2pm CET for the #WEBINAR with jonathan Wright for a talk on "ID11 Material Science"
#ExploreESRFbeamlines @ESRF_UserOrg

https://t.co/XydGVrQ9uK

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@xtalb 10% is published garbage? It sounds like it needs a systematic review!

[Acta_Materialia @Acta_Materialia]

https://t.co/cwA0ybbTm1

[Robert Palgrave @Robert_Palgrave]

Woah getting a bit crazy now. Look at all those peaks not fitted at all 🤯

[Robert Palgrave @Robert_Palgrave]

Ok here we go....

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@benoflan21 @Robert_Palgrave What about Paris? https://t.co/1oPbNBJDwI

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@Robert_Palgrave @benoflan21 https://t.co/bP4GEx6euI

[Sacha Fop @sacha_fop]

Pleased to have Prof Paul Attfield for today’s @aberdeenuni chem dept seminar presenting his work as winner of the John Goodenough Award @RoySocChem "New Materials from High Pressure" 💎💫
First time I saw my academic parent and grandparent in the same room 😅
@AbSSChem

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@jcesar_dasilva Do you count the phase contrast work at BM18 as "coherence" ? They seem to rely on the small source ...

[jonathan wright @jonwright76]

@MikeGlazer1 What about the "lattice modes"?

[JJ X-ray @xray_jj]

We're looking for a beamline scientist or engineer to join us!

We offer a stable job in industry, where you'll have a chance to see lots of beamlines all over the world.

https://t.co/HaSCCdnYiR