The irony is wild. Lula-STF keep pushing the narrative that @jairbolsonaro orchestrated the so-called “Disney coup,” yet we’re watching what looks like the real deal unfold right before our eyes. You can’t make this stuff up! 🤡🍿
----
A ironia é impressionante. Lula-STF continuam insistindo na narrativa de q @jairbolsonaro teria orquestrado o chamado “golpe da Disney”, eqto estamos assistindo ao q parece ser um golpe de vdd acontecendo bem diante dos nossos olhos. Só vendo pra acreditar! 🤡🍿
Shocking scenes in Poland. Police, dispatched by the Tusk government, have forced their way into the independent Constitutional Tribunal. Security personnel guarding the building and the Tribunal’s documents have been removed. The Vice-President of the Tribunal is being denied entry to the premises. This is a violation of all democratic principles.
My father @jairbolsonaro is arrested, my brother @FlavioBolsonaro is exiled here in USA, I am living in Texas for almost 2 years and several others Brazilians can't comeback to their homeland.
Is this looks like a democracy?
Be like Poland >> @D_Tarczynski 👏
President Trump is the most transformative political leader in American History — and he has single-handedly saved America from those who would destroy it.
It has been the privilege of my lifetime to have served on his team from Day One, and I am honored beyond words to serve as his White House Chief of Staff.
I want to thank the incomparable Susie Wiles for her years of devoted service to the President and the Country, and for her friendship.
The mission now is more clear than ever: Fight with all of our soul to support our President and defend this magnificent Republic.
Meet Trump’s New White House Chief of Staff.
Stephen Miller has been one of the strongest fighters in the administration on immigration, fighting Birthright Citizenship scammers, rooting out fraud and fiercest on-air defender of America First issues.
LFG @StephenM 🔥
🧵 THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup
@PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat.
They didn't go after him because of drinking. They didn't go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don't.
I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
Elon Musk: "Mesmo que eu seja criticado por todo o mundo, não vou largar o X". O motivo faz pensar.
Repórter: "Por que você se apega tanto ao X?"
Elon: "O que você quer dizer com isso?"
Repórter: "Desde a aquisição, só há críticas, não é?"
Elon: "É verdade."
Repórter: "Políticos também o criticam."
Elon: "Sim."
Repórter: "Há conflitos com autoridades reguladoras."
Elon: "É verdade."
Repórter: "Honestamente, não seria mais fácil vendê-lo?"
Elon: "Por quê?"
Repórter: "Você tem a Tesla e a SpaceX, não é?"
Elon: "Tenho sim."
Repórter: "Não há necessidade de ficar no centro das controvérsias, certo?"
Elon: "Mas o que isso resolveria?"
Repórter: "...... Hein?"
Elon: "Eu acho importante ter um lugar onde as opiniões possam ser trocadas livremente."
Repórter: "Mas há opiniões desagradáveis também, não é?"
Elon: "Claro."
Repórter: "Há opiniões erradas também."
Elon: "É verdade."
Repórter: "Então, não deveria haver restrições?"
Elon: "Até onde restringir?"
Repórter: "Isso é..."
Elon: "Quem decide quais são as opiniões corretas?"
Repórter: "..."
Elon: "É fácil proteger apenas as opiniões com as quais concordamos."
Repórter: "Sim."
Elon: "Mas e quando surgem opiniões contrárias?"
Repórter: "..."
Elon: "É aí que o verdadeiro teste da liberdade de expressão acontece, não acha?"
🇵🇾 Escândalo bancário no Paraguai:
* Presidente renunciou
* Todo mundo preso
* Povo vai ser ressarcido
🇧🇷 Escândalo bancário no Brasil:
* Presidente reeleito
* Suprema corte envolvida
* Mais imposto na bunda do povo
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
This is all you need to know about the Brazilian Supreme Court: Gilmar is a known gangster, a true criminal. He is threatening Nunes, another Supreme Court Justice, just like him. Period.
🇧🇷🇺🇸 Watch why Brazil’s Federal Police requested the seizure of my brother @FlavioBolsonaro’s passport - with the justice Alexandre de Moraes approval - just SEVEN MINUTES after the election results were announced.
If you still call this a democracy, then you are what we call in Brazil a “useful idiot” - or, even worse, a blind far-left extremist.
🎥 @scrowder on @LouderwCrowder
👇Watch the full episode:
https://t.co/WKHYsyyhPU
How did Lula go from prison to becoming eligible to run for president again?
The answer involves three distinct judicial decisions. The chronology matters.
In 2018, Lula’s corruption and money laundering conviction had been upheld on appeal. He began serving his sentence, and the electoral court barred his presidential candidacy under Brazil’s Clean Record Law, which disqualifies candidates with certain convictions upheld by a judicial panel.
First came his release. On November 7, 2019, the Supreme Court (STF) voted 6–5 to prohibit imprisonment solely to begin serving a sentence before appeals were exhausted. The ruling applied generally, beyond Lula’s case, with the exception of @jairbolsonaro who was immediately jailed with total disregard to the rule that was created for Lula. Lula walked out of prison the following day. His conviction remained in place, and he was still ineligible to run.
Then came the restoration of eligibility. On March 8, 2021, Justice Edson Fachin annulled the decisions in four Lula proceedings, including his convictions, because the district level federal court “lacked jurisdiction” over those cases. Fachin ordered them transferred to another court. With the convictions annulled, the basis for Lula’s electoral disqualification fell away. The full Supreme Court upheld Fachin’s decision, 8–3, on April 15, 2021.
Separately, on March 23, 2021, the STF ruled, 3–2, that the trial judge had been biased in convicting Lula, invalidating the judge’s acts in that case. Can you imagine if Alexandre de Moraes could have his decisions annulled on the basis of being “biased”?
These distinctions are essential. Release pending appeal did not restore eligibility. Annulment for lack of jurisdiction did. The finding of judicial bias provided a separate ground for invalidating the proceedings.
The decisions that reopened Lula’s path to the presidency were not acquittals on the underlying corruption allegations.
That’s how they did it in Brazil. What do you think they’re planning in Argentina next year?
Escolher seguir o consórcio como meio de informação é escolher estar desinformado e sendo preparado para o “abate” mental e posteriormente se tornar um soldadinho do regime!