Jean-Paul Bayley

I talk about learner-centred training for subject matter experts that sticks. 10 years in training, 1000+ people trained, TBR TCC Certifier.

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

Brain-friendly Openings 101

Over the past 10 years, I have trained over 1000 people in a range of topics.

Want to know a secret?

I use the same 5 Brain-friendly Opening Tips every time 🧵👇

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

@Nicolascole77 🤖

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

https://t.co/oYEn0ZY8O0

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

Brain-friendly Content Delivery 101

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

https://t.co/PYRI7KLhyS

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

Find it here: https://t.co/QwCxV1fTlq

#Training #TrainTheTrainer #TrainingFromTheBackOfTheRoom #TBR #TFTBOTR #LearningAndDevelopment #AcceleratedLearning #InstructionalDesign

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

- leverage cognitive neuroscience to create truly effective learning experiences.
- captivate learners in ways you never thought possible.
- acquire a simple 4-step model for learner-centred learning.
- gain 6 learning principles that make learning stick.

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

And if you want to learn more about how to apply the science of learning in your training, join 100s of trainers who have taken the TBR Practitioner class:

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

So, while the science doesn't "prove" anything, the evidence *supports* an idea.

Next time a sensational scientific claim catches your eye, scrutinise the evidence. What lies beneath might surprise you.

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

Insight 3: The science doesn't "prove" anything.

Finally, the insight that the science doesn't "prove" anything was the most surprising.

Here's why the science doesn't "prove" anything.

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

- Science is not that definitive.
- Scientists use phrases like "the research supports" when drawing conclusions.
- Research papers suggest other areas of research to test the conclusions further.

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

- Reproducibility of research is important. If nobody has reproduced the results, the research might not be applicable elsewhere.

Accepting scientific results without question leads to embarrassing retractions further down the line.

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

3 Insights From 10 Years Of Studying The Science Of Learning.

Over the last 10 years, I've been studying the science of learning.

I started to study the science of learning to improve my own practice as a trainer.

Here are 3 insights I've had:

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

Insight 2: You must dig into the detail.

This changed everything for me—for 3 reasons:

- Scientists usually hedge their conclusions. You need to understand what they are hedging against and why.
- Sometimes research doesn't stand up to scrutiny - even in peer-reviewed research.

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

The problem is the public read these stories and assume them to be true. We then have to spend a lot of time and energy debunking.

Learning Styles - I'm looking at you!

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

Insight 1: There is a lot of nonsense in the public domain.

The press love to sensationalise advances in science. This seems especially true when it comes to how we learn. The newspaper version of the story is usually way beyond the scope of the scientists' claims.

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

https://t.co/VaGXtg2A8P

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

Are Your Training Sessions Learner-Focused? 3 Steps for Consultants to Engage Learners and Ensure Learning Sticks

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

https://t.co/2nHqGYsmOH

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

Comparative Analysis: Traditional Learning vs Brain-Friendly Learning.

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

https://t.co/YmEfjVcKkg

[Jean-Paul Bayley @jpbayley]

Understanding Cognitive Load Theory is essential to solving the paradox between content quantity and learning effectiveness.