The farming industry says signing up to EU food rules could cost £800 m just for the transition, along with restrictions on innovation and research. More government damage to our farms.
Good morning Liz.
You seem to be unaware of a few things. Let us help you out here.
⚫️ As an EU member, around 27% of types of goods were able to be imported into the UK from fellow WTO members without a tariff applied - from outside the EU that level is now over 50%
⚫️ Food inflation since Brexit has been *lower* in the UK than it has in the EU, so food is cheaper in the UK
⚫️ As for the NHS, the NHS budget has been increased by over £750 Million a week since we left the EU
⚫️ As for UK global trade, the UK has trade deals in place with over 100 countries around the world, many of which are on the same or better terms than the EU had or indeed has
⚫️ In 2016 the UK exported a total of £582.6 Billion worth of goods and services - in 2025 that had increased to £930.6 Billion
You continue to talk about a topic that you appear to know absolutely nothing about - or perhaps you do, and so you simply lie to your followers in the hopes that they are too blinkered to fact check you.
Perhaps you could confirm whether it is ignorance or deceit that drives your posts of continued misinformation.
I’m sick to death of Lib Dem’s in particular saying trans identifying men are no risk to women. Official MOJ statistics show over 60% of trans identifying men in prison are there for sex offences against women or children. In mens prisons is 18%. Yet we understand why we keep men out of private spaces for women. Safeguarding. That’s over 3x times a higher risk. Stats are stats. Even if you don’t like them. Check out this figure yourself. Next time someone spout this nonsense I will endeavour to give the actual official stats. It’s time we work with truths & not fluffy fantasy.
Police community support officer (PCSO) sacked after asking questions about Islam during a diversity training session.
Luke Salmons lost his job with North Yorkshire Police and was barred from policing after a conversation about Gaza with a Muslim officer at a training day on race, religion and culture.
Staff were encouraged to ask questions in what they were assured was a “safe space”. Salmons said the day turned into an “indoctrination” session, with trainers chanting “Islam is a religion of peace” and discussions about white privilege taking place.
He asked a Muslim officer for his views on terrorist attacks carried out by groups such as Hamas. The officer was happy to discuss the issue and even invited him for a coffee afterwards to continue the conversation. Within two days, Salmons was suspended for gross misconduct by an inspector who told him: “I don’t like your beliefs.”
Mr Salmons said: “I loved my job and I was good at it. I was well respected as a PCSO and my colleagues said they loved working with me and couldn’t understand what was happening.”
Speaking about the events of October 2024, he said: “The whole day was pretty much about Islam. At one point the trainers walked up and down the room for several minutes saying ‘Islam is a religion of peace’ over and over again. It was bizarre.
“Then, a Muslim sergeant spoke about his faith and invited questions. It was made clear that there was no such thing as a bad question and we could speak freely.
“Someone asked him about why it was bad to depict images of Mohammed, then I asked him what, as a peaceful Muslim, he thought about the situation in Gaza, with Hamas and other terrorist groups carrying out atrocities in the name of Islam.
“We had a really good discussion and I asked him what he understood jihad to mean. There was no problem, I spoke to him privately at lunch and he asked me what books I had read about Islam. He said he would love to speak to me more, so we arranged to meet for a coffee at his police station.
“I believed I was on safe ground when the training sessions invited open discussion. I quickly discovered that questioning Islam is now treated as ‘wrongthink’ within North Yorkshire Police.”
“But an overzealous inspector took against me and that was the end of my career, even though I had done nothing wrong.”
He later won an appeal against his dismissal but never received an apology from the force, where he said a “culture of fear” existed among officers who were scared of saying the wrong thing.
There is an Islamic blasphemy law being enforced by police forces across the country.
Read more below in @Telegraph 👇
I don’t condone the behaviour of course but Daniel Frost, who pushed a bin at officers during disorder in Southampton has already been jailed.
Why couldn’t this speedy justice be done for Mohammed Fahir Amaaz and Muhammad Amaad who punched the officers at Manchester Airport?
In October 2024, about 100 Labour party members traveled to the US to openly campaign for Kamala Harris. Now Starmer is very concerned that a statement from the Vice President is “interfering in [their] democracy”
Davey supported all the mad bullshit over BLM, convicted criminal George Floyd, ‘structural racism’ and all the maddest bullshit from the maddest parts of California’s communist loony bin.
He supported all the changes to police and every other institution which have made us an international joke.
He supported the Boriswave and the importing of thousands of sex criminals.
He supported the continued coverup of the grooming Gangs which is why he wants to ban X and impose censorship.
Davey Starmer etc need censorship so they can continue importing millions from Africa and the worst parts of South Asia.
Until we retire them they will continue wrecking the country
Good news. My patriotic friend @LordWeirDUP won the Private Members’ Bill ballot, and has just introduced a Bill to prohibit any change in the sovereignty of the Chagos Islands without the consent of both Parliament and the Chagossian people.
We are going to win this thing.
🇮🇴🇬🇧
He looks in the mirror and sees the reflection of perfection ,he has never ever had a proper job outside politics ,so full of self worth .its pretty obvious he is going to win as so as many hate Starmer and will vote tacitly as well as Restore stealing votes from reform ( Lowe in cahoots with the Tory party to stop Reform ) but my god can we really cope with 3 more years of Labour who only have one single strategy ,’Tax and spend ‘ ….
I spoke today in the Lords on the fallacy of believing that just building 'more of everything' - nuclear, gas, renewables - will make electricity cheaper.
Renewables are the problem. Until we stop adding more to the system, our electricity costs will continue to increase.
A magnificent letter from a magnificent woman.
“ Dear Mr Wright,
It must be terribly difficult having to share your name with the legendary and enormously popular disk jockey. My late husband, Sir Michael Caine, was not the actor, Nonetheless, Hollywood starlets might call saying they were in town.
Awkward all around.
I am a law maker. You would not expect me to pontificate on structural instability, hazardous materials or airborne toxins. I know nothing about accelerants, burn patterns or smoke staining. If I told the people, you represent how to deal with a fire I ought, rightly, be ignored.
What the blazes, then, do you think you are doing when trying to meddle with the adoption of the EHRC's latest Service Code? If no one else has told you already I am sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but you appear to have no idea what you are talking about. Did you think to run your nonsense past a lawyer? (If you did,hesitate to pay.)
The provision of changing and lavatorial facilities by an employer is governed by the Workplace (Health and Safety) Regulations 1992. Employers are required to provide separate facilities for males and females. There is no option to provide only mixed facilities. Mixed facilities are optional but sex-separated facilities are compulsory. That has been the case for 34 years. It has not changed because of a Supreme Court Judgment. You might not have understood it before, but you do not need EHRC Guidance to understand it now. Fire fighters must be provided with biologically separated sanitary and changing facilities. That will remain the case even if the EHRC Guidance is frustrated.
No "hard-won" rights have been rolled back. The rights you imagine (or, more likely, have been briefed about) have never existed. Rights do not accrue and acquire validity thanks to magical thinking or bad advice.
That which you frame as a call for employers and service providers to "go beyond minimum requirements" is, in fact, a demand that they break the law. I assume you had no idea that was the case. I can imagine you being keen to change laws with which you disagree, democratically, but I should be surprised were you to knowingly call for outright anarchy.
The laws governing access to legitimately sex-separated facilities have not changed for employers since 1992, and for service providers since 2010. If you were ignorant of them before you have no excuse now. If you do not like them you may seek, democratically, to change them.
Until then, I strongly encourage you to urge members to obey the law and stop posturing as though the law is something you might like it to be but is not.
Yours sincerely
Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne
London
SW1A OPW”
15 men, convicted of 88 counts of rape, against one child.
This is a grim reminder that we still don't know the full extent of the grooming gangs.
We don't know how many perpetrators, or victims, are out there, or where gangs like these are still operating.
You, Bridget, are a member of a government that has impoverished parents with higher taxes, soaring fuel bills. the highest energy bills in the world, and yet here you are boasting about your stupid breakfast clubs.
Families are really struggling because of Labour.
Unlikely he will admit that the anger was caused by his cabinet's appalling incompetence, and the two-tier policing they imposed
Nothing good will happen till he's gone
🇪🇺🇨🇳 The European Union's share of the global economy has fallen from 30% to 17% in just 17 years.
That's roughly the same relative decline China experienced during the Qing Dynasty.
The difference?
China took about 50 years.
Europe did it in 17.
For decades, Europe helped shape the global economy, global institutions, and the rules of the international order.
Now it's increasingly adapting to a world being shaped by others.
The real question is whether Europe still knows how to stop it.
Source: legrandcontinent, Counter Intelligence Global (Telegram)