These are the exact same people who made “countering hate” their entire identity.
They were the first to plant “Hate Has No Place Here” signs on their lawns.
They insist “hate speech isn’t free speech.”
They proudly fund groups like Hope Not Hate and Stop AAPI Hate
They still chant “Love Trumps Hate” like it’s scripture.
Yet here they are, in the pages of The Globe and Mail, publishing a guide on “how to properly hate” Elon Musk for the crime of building SpaceX into a company that could make him the world’s first trillionaire.
Proof positive that their “anti-hate” crusade was never about hate.
They are, in reality, full of hate. It was always about who they’re allowed to hate
No headline accurately represents the Canadian mainstream better than this one.
This is what has always lied beneath the veneer of platitudes in polite Canadian society. This is what Trump was so successful in exposing.
This is how mainstream Canadians really think. They're painfully mediocre, and because the world outside of Canada doesn't reward mediocrity, they're isolated to their corner where they outwardly hate everything that reveals how underwhelming they are.
This has always existed. In the past it manifested as passive aggression and a crabs in a bucket mentality that caused them to destroy any potential for greatness that emerged from under the mainstream. Now the passivity is gone and they're just hateful. Canada embraced woke because woke made it ok to behave this way.
And this is how they've always wanted to behave.
You don’t have to love Elon Musk to recognize what this headline says about us.
A country that spends more time criticizing wealth creation than encouraging it sends a clear message to builders: your success is tolerated, not celebrated.
Canada should be the best place in the world to build ambitious companies. Headlines like this make us look like we’re not quite ready for that.
DEI is a toxic mix of white saviour complex, white guilt and cultural Marxism.
DEI negates centuries of progress by denying the individual *and* their agency.
DEI forcibly ascribes traits to people that they do not possess and crimes that they did not commit.
DEI is a cancer.
Intrinsic value is not bestowed by rhetoric; it is earned in use.
Even fiat, miserable creature that it is, can pay taxes, settle bills, and buy coffee. BTC cannot. Lightning does not scale. BTC does not scale.
A system that cannot be deployed, exchanged, or used at scale is not money. It is a glass ornament in a burning bank.
It is not true. I know you’re furiously googling but the source you provided is based on samples and acknowledges right in the article “(Canada, Venezuela, and Iran) have wide uncertainty within and wide variability across crude blends.”
If you don’t believe BMO believe your own government. This is from Budget 2025:
The SPLC said that "restricting and banning abortion is a tool the far-right uses to maintain white supremacy."
I asked the President of the SPLC if he thinks that pro-lifers are white supremacists.
And then reminded him that nearly half of all babies killed in the womb are black.
🚨𝗙𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗙𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗗 𝗜𝗧... 𝟮 𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗛𝗦!!!🚨
Carney admits on tape: When voters blocked his ESG plans, "We" Central Bankers acted like "Regulators" going around the voters through the BACK DOOR!
Manipulating fossil fuel prices by withholding lending.
Now he's PM!🙃
Dr. Alveda King tearing into the Southern Poverty Law Center during a hearing accusing the organization of fueling racial division in the United States while claiming to fight it.
The niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. pointing to allegations referenced in a federal superseding indictment that she says raise serious questions about the group's conduct.
“My family legacy reflects the very truth that America is strongest when we recognize our common humanity… That is why I am troubled by the conduct and messaging of organizations that claim to fight hatred, while profiteering from division.”
"I have heard some proponents of the carbon tax defend it by suggesting that the world will require decarbonized oil barrels going forward. To be honest, Cenovus places over one million barrels a day across three continents, and none of our customers have ever suggested or even asked about the carbon intensity of Canadian crudes.
If customers were willing to pay for decarbonized barrels, we would certainly see these price signals and not require government interference.
The carbon tax escalates through time, making our industry less resilient at lower commodity prices, and will require the premature shut-in and reclamation of oil producing projects that would otherwise be economic to produce.
Much of this is being orchestrated in the belief that we can build a functioning carbon market. The reality is that carbon markets are a political construct and there are no examples of functioning, enduring, or investible carbon markets to draw from." /5
"The oil sands companies can build and operate [Pathways] if there is an appropriate sharing of costs between industry, the federal government, and the provincial government. The question is really, how will Canada and Canadians benefit from this project?
The reality is that this is a project with no revenue. It is simply another cost burden that will be borne by industry and the two levels of government.
The current estimate of the cost of capturing and sequestering one megatonne of CO2 is between $1.5 and $2.0 billion.
A project of this size will require the expenditure of $20 to $30 billion dollars which will show up as an incremental cost for industry and a budget deficit and debt for our governments.
And Canadians should ask – what do we get for this level of expenditure? The answer is that we will reduce global emissions by 16 megatonnes. In a world that emits over 57,000 megatonnes annually, we will reduce our global emissions by 0.02 of one percent. For $20 to $30 billion dollars of spend, we will reduce global emissions by 0.02 of one percent." /6