Some of Ken Paxton's scandals so far:
—Offered an admitted child molester one day in jail after he repeatedly raped a young boy
—Impeached by his own party on 20 counts of corruption, bribery, abuse of public trust, and obstruction of justice
—Owns at least 15 homes across the nation worth $9 million, despite a government salary of $153k
—Accepted $77,000 from men who allegedly sexually assaulted women, exposed themselves to children, and appear in the Epstein Files
—Spent July 4th, 2026, and America's 250th birthday in London
—Fled to Utah during Texas's deadly 2021 winter storms, which killed 246 people, a disaster in which Paxton was "responsible for overseeing key aspects of the state's response"
—Only Texas official to be impeached by his own party in nearly 50 years
—Net worth increased 7,000% since taking office
—Failed to disclose he secretly purchased real estate worth millions in Hawaii, Florida, and Utah, a direct violation of Texas ethics rules
—Accepted $448,000 from data center industry executives and PACs
—Bankrolled by the family who attempted to buy Jeffrey Epstein's "Lolita Express" private jet, and the family who bought Epstein's Zorro Ranch
—Said the Uvalde shooting, in which 21 children and teachers were murdered, was part of a "plan" by "God"
—Owns a $1.6 million luxury home in Oklahoma with a private chef, masseuse, and housekeeping
—Voted against a Texas program that spent billions on cancer research
—Allegedly committed voter fraud using a false address in 6 different elections
—Protected a laboratory that tortured and killed over 400 puppies
—Charged with felony securities fraud shortly after taking office over allegations he misled investors, resulting in additional SEC charges
—Fled his own home to avoid being served with a subpoena
—Illegally appointed attorney to conduct weaponized investigation
—Reported to the FBI by his own top deputies, who alleged he was abusing his office to benefit a close friend and donor
—Currently charges families an average of $750/night to stay at his luxury Oklahoma home
—Terminated the four senior deputies who reported his misconduct to law enforcement
—Used taxpayer funds as attorney general to benefit a friend
—Took a luxury vacation to Iceland after being exposed for releasing a child molester
—Has a secretive personal fortune of $100,000 to $1 million every 18 months from a hospital cellphone tower
—Owns a $750,000 luxury home in Florida, advertised as a place to live "a true Florida lifestyle"
—Celebrated forcing women out of Texas for life-saving reproductive care
—Offered a plea deal to a child sex abuser that failed to register him as a sex offender in Texas, letting him back on the streets
—Conducted a sham investigation of his own whistleblower complaints
—Owns four luxury homes and land in Utah worth over $2 million
—Wasted taxpayer money in an effort to delay his own trial
—Staff attempted to obstruct his Texas House investigation by reportedly threatening witnesses
—Cost Texans over $6.6 million in his court judgment for retaliating against whistleblowers
—His own lawyer refused to endorse him, and endorsed James Talarico instead
NEW AD: Why is Ken Paxton refusing to debate James Talarico?
Because his billionaire handlers won't let their favorite puppet answer questions in public.
Go ahead, @KenPaxtonTX. Prove us wrong. 🐓
Regarding Trump's little Lake ONTARIO stunt today:
A U.S. president can change a geographic name for official U.S. federal government use, but CANNOT globally or legally rename a shared bi-national body of water like the Great Lakes.
An executive order can direct U.S. federal agencies and update official U.S. databases (such as federal maps and documents) to use a preferred name.
NO International Power:
This order holds NO legal authority outside the United States. It cannot force Canada, international bodies, global mapmakers, or other nations to recognize the new name.
Shared Waters:
Four of the five Great Lakes sit along the U.S.–Canada border and are jointly managed through treaties and agreements. Unilateral action by one country changes nothing regarding ownership, borders, or the name used by the neighbouring nation.
In conclusion......this bloated, orange fool is wasting everyone's time.
Period.
What is with the sudden influx of disc rot fringe advocacy or contrarianism? I don't think I've ever, not a single time, owned a disc that has gone bad in my lifetime that wasn't from mishandling or improper storage. Plus when you own it you can back it up.
🚨| Última Hora:
Comunicado Oficial de Cyberleek, el grupo detrás de la nueva filtración de GTA VI donde exigen el cumplimiento de los siguientes puntos:
PUNTO 1:
Ningún consumidor deberá pagar por un juego a través de tiendas digitales antes de su lanzamiento y de que existan análisis independientes. Las preventas físicas de medios tangibles seguirán estando permitidas.
Las preventas no fueron creadas para los jugadores. Se crearon porque los discos físicos tenían límites de fabricación. En la distribución digital no hay inventario. No hay escasez de existencias. Una copia digital no puede agotarse. Sin embargo, las editoras mantuvieron el sistema de preventa y eliminaron su único beneficio para el consumidor. Ahora los jugadores pagan por adelantado y no reciben nada a cambio, excepto un temporizador de cuenta atrás y una apariencia cosmética.
Si las editoras quieren obtener ingresos antes del lanzamiento, pueden fabricar discos. Imprimir cajas. Ponerlos en las estanterías. Ganar ese dinero mediante la producción física.
PUNTO 2:
Ninguna editora deberá vender acceso a contenido para un jugador que ya esté presente en los archivos del juego base que el consumidor ha comprado.
Esto significa: no a las claves de desbloqueo, no a archivos de marcador de posición de 1 MB, no a cambiar una variable de bloqueado a desbloqueado para contenido que ya está en el disco o en la descarga.
Cuando alguien paga más de 70 USD por un juego, ha comprado los datos. Todos ellos. Venderles un archivo que cambia de locked = true a locked = false para una misión, personaje, arma o capítulo de la historia para un jugador significa cobrarles dos veces por el mismo producto.
PUNTO 3:
Cualquier juego que incluya contenido para un jugador deberá incluir un estado alternativo sin conexión. Cuando finalice el soporte del servidor, la editora deberá publicar un parche final que desbloquee todo el contenido para un jugador para su uso local e indefinido.
The Crew tenía una campaña para un jugador. La gente pagó el precio completo. Después, Ubisoft cerró los servidores y todo el juego murió, incluido el contenido para un jugador. Sin reembolsos. Sin parche. Sin alternativa.
El contenido para un jugador depende de una única cosa: el hardware que el consumidor ya posee. Hacer que muera cuando los servidores desaparecen es un robo.
Estos tres puntos son el suelo, no el techo, de lo que resulta aceptable. Si las editoras los incumplen, serán señaladas.
CYBERLEEK seguirá interrumpiendo sus operaciones hasta que emitan una declaración pública y una disculpa con un compromiso concreto para reparar el daño que han causado.
No habrá negociaciones privadas. No habrá acuerdos silenciosos. El público lo verá, o los «leaks» no se detendrán.
Las editoras deberían tener cuidado. Si CYBERLEEK puede llegar hasta Rockstar, nadie está a salvo.
Este es un mensaje para todas las grandes corporaciones: comportaos o seréis el próximo objetivo.
People will look at a member of Congress who’s one of the few not involved in insider trading and act like it’s a bad thing they don’t have a lot of money. This is what happens when we elect normal people to Congress who have student debt and don’t engage in insider trading.
@SwordGunblade09 Good point, but at least a private server can function as a means to complete the national dexes on physical carts well past Feb. 2027.