Huru Ubuntu

I am JS Biko — a free earthling from Alkebulan; ΖΩΗ est a groß mise en scène 🌹Art & Tech;… ✍️ #AfroRennaisance ✊🏿

[Darwin Wangechi @D__wy]

Legend in my books. Nanyuki 🔥

[Footy Humour @FootyHumour]

When Messi finally met someone shorter than him 😭

[Huru Ubuntu @jsbiko]

@GenuisHealth Smoothie

[Genuis Health 💊 @GenuisHealth]

Belly fat?

[Kawangware Finest ™ - Geoffrey Moturi @cbs_ke]

Some thinks this is AI.....

[Fico(Fan) @CFCFico]

Streets will never forget this Ramirez finish, did prime de gea so dirty man 😭

[liam @liamdahgoat]

Football will never reach this level of perfection again

[BeksFCB @Joshua__Ubeku]

I thought she was Messi’s mom at first only to find out that she’s the Argentina national team's chef. 😅❤️

[Deks @Rhyso_1]

This was the best moment from the 2025/2026 season

[Huru Ubuntu @jsbiko]

@DavidPattt Let them choose 😁

[Huru Ubuntu @jsbiko]

@calmstreeet @nyxwanga You must be working for their PR eeeh?

[Blackboy @blackboyrizzy]

Can anyone relate to this?

[Huru Ubuntu @jsbiko]

@LifeOfBoch Fake list

[Huru Ubuntu @jsbiko]

@integritya18612 @nyxwanga @blanketsandwine Police are some of the thieves

[Faith Odhiambo @FaithOdhiambo8]

Yesterday's High Court judgment on the impeachment of H.E. Rigathi Gachagua raises serious and legitimate questions that our constitutional jurisprudence must grapple with honestly. The three-judge bench found that the Senate violated the former Deputy President's right to a fair hearing under Article 50 of the Constitution specifically by declining to grant an adjournment when he was unable to attend the proceedings. The court acknowledged that violation, issued a declaratory order and awarded Ksh.50 million in constitutional damages. Yet the bench ultimately upheld the impeachment itself. I respect the court and the constitutional role it plays. But I believe this outcome calls for serious reflection on the coherence of our remedial framework.

The tension in the judgment lies in this, if the Senate's refusal to adjourn was a constitutional infirmity serious enough to warrant a finding of violation and a Ksh.50 million award, then the question that naturally follows is whether that infirmity was capable of tainting the entire removal process. The right to a fair hearing is not procedural decoration. It is a substantive constitutional guarantee, particularly in proceedings that result in the removal of a person from high public office. Courts must therefore grapple carefully with what it means to vindicate a right while simultaneously affirming the outcome that flowed from its violation. It is a difficult balance and I appreciate that the bench was navigating complicated constitutional terrain.

It is instructive to recall the reasoning of the Supreme Court in the landmark 2017 presidential election petition delivered by the then Chief Justice David Maraga. The court, in a 4-2 majority, nullified the presidential election not on the basis that the outcome was necessarily wrong but on the basis that the process through which it was arrived at did not conform to the Constitution and the law. The court found that irregularities and illegalities in the transmission of results had compromised the integrity of the election and that the constitutional standard required more than a plausible result, it required a process that was itself constitutionally compliant. That principle that a flawed process cannot produce a constitutionally valid outcome remains a pillar of our public law.

When we place that 2017 reasoning alongside yesterday's judgment, a legitimate concern emerges. Both cases involved constitutional violations in the course of a high-stakes removal or electoral process. In 2017, the violation of constitutional standards was sufficient to nullify the result entirely. Yesterday, a violation of the right to a fair hearing was found, remedied in damages but the result was preserved. These are not necessarily irreconcilable positions, courts do have discretion in fashioning remedies but the distinction must be clearly reasoned and transparently justified because the precedent being set will govern how future impeachments are conducted and how future courts respond to violations within those processes.

My concern is about the precedent this decision may establish. If a constitutional violation during impeachment proceedings can be remedied by damages without disturbing the outcome, future Parliaments and Senates may not feel the full weight of their constitutional obligations when handling removal proceedings. The court itself noted the urgent need for Parliament to enact a dedicated statutory framework under Article 150 governing the removal of a Deputy President which is a legislative gap that should never have existed this long. That recommendation must not be ignored. A constitutional democracy is built on the integrity of its processes not merely its outcomes. We must ensure that the right to a fair hearing in Kenya remains substantive and not merely symbolic.

[Huru Ubuntu @jsbiko]

@edwinsifuna @LindaMwananchi_ @FaithOdhiambo8 Omwami you were one of the loud mouths who voted to illegally impeach Riggy G. Mumeambiwa na korti mchange, mlipe hiyo 50 million. Are you just gonna stay mute on the injustice ama tukuwache? 🤣🤣

[Huru Ubuntu @jsbiko]

It’s been 17 hours since Kalonzo Musyoka @skmusyoka tweeted. Bado anangoja kupita katikati yao? 🤣

… is this the man you want to trust with the presidency

[mati H. @mati586386]

Mistrz Świata oraz narodowość selekcjonera:
1930 🇺🇾🇺🇾
1934 🇮🇹 🇮🇹
1938 🇮🇹 🇮🇹
1950 🇺🇾🇺🇾
1954 🇩🇪🇩🇪
1958 🇧🇷🇧🇷
1962 🇧🇷🇧🇷
1966 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
1970 🇧🇷🇧🇷
1974 🇩🇪🇩🇪
1978 🇦🇷🇦🇷
1982 🇮🇹 🇮🇹
1986 🇦🇷🇦🇷
1990 🇩🇪🇩🇪
1994 🇧🇷🇧🇷
1998 🇫🇷🇫🇷
2002 🇧🇷🇧🇷
2006 🇮🇹 🇮🇹
2010 🇪🇸🇪🇸
2014 🇩🇪🇩🇪
2018 🇫🇷🇫🇷
2022 🇦🇷🇦🇷

[Chelsea FC @ChelseaFC]

📃 The full list of players to have scored at the World Cup while being a Chelsea player! 🌟

[Futebol Nostálgico! @futnostalgico]

A Reação de Diego Maradona quando o hino nacional argentino foi vaiado antes da final da Copa do Mundo de 1990 🤬