@networkservice @jwbensley Sadly, odds are heavily against you when attempting to innovate from academia. I'm not sure you would have been any happier having years of your life consumed by a "hot topic" in networking which turned out to be a rehash of a concept that also hadn't worked 20 years earlier 🤣
Roborace is the world first driver-less/autonomous motorsports category.
This is one of their first live-broadcasted events.
This was the second run.
It drove straight into a wall.
Polling in Texas shows Biden and Trump neck-and-neck. That’s 38 electoral votes, a Senate seat, and a handful of congressional seats up for grabs.
Winning Texas would not only guarantee victory in 2020, it would remake the electoral map for generations. It’s a top priority.
Upon cursory analysis, we found no vendor implements all of our poorly vetted requirements, forcing us to implement our own solution to this deceptively mundane problem.
@woodyatpch@PCHglobal Perhaps you are referring to a former colleague of mine? 😅 I moved on from fastly in early 2018, but there were many, many others involved in that effort.
Reviewer #2 rejected a paper with the comment “Unrealistic problems. Unrealistic solutions.” for something running in production at a global scale for 2 years.
This article should have cited https://t.co/pZcZ0YUgFL or https://t.co/PPNBaoHXQb.
I get why it doesn't, but not citing work due to affiliation harms authors, not competitors. My green card application was rejected due to lack of industry impact. Guess how USCIS determines that?
@jgrahamc@dwragg Intentional or otherwise, citing Beamer as an allusion to "the Faild approach" erases the contributions of the countless people who made such an approach possible. The vendor lobbying to increase ECMP nexthop limits. The community outreach with NANOG and IETF. It all adds up.