realjudeleelind

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@2Philosophical_ @RalphStefanWeir You don't take illusionism seriously because you're daft

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@Benthamsbulldog @clairlemon @hamandcheese She's so confidently dumb it actually hurts

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@ThoughtEnjoyer @liquid2ulu @Pontus4Pope You can by knowing the conclusion is false via other premises you do know.

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@ThoughtEnjoyer @liquid2ulu @Pontus4Pope You can know a premise must be false without knowing which. You can also know which without knowing how to fix them. You have no idea what you are talking about.

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@ShadWulf @Benthamsbulldog Sounds like no reason to think such a being doesn't exist and I don't believe such a being does exist

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@Benthamsbulldog This applies to me except the last part

[Mehdi Hasan @mehdirhasan]

Well done @UKLabour, this is what you gifted Donald Trump and Marco Rubio 🤦🏽‍♂️

[Joe @burnthalies]

Milei's fake libertarian, Amerizionist puppet regime expropriating people of their private property. Like clockwork.

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@PaulTonkinson @richie26188 How can you say he does it more often when you just said you've never seen another PM do it at all?

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@PaulTonkinson This post is fundamentally unserious. Talk about substance, not mere aesthetics. Not hard.

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@PaulTonkinson @richie26188 You haven't been paying attention then

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@corymassimino I'm so sorry for your loss ❤️

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@801formal_llama @Ace_Archist I appreciate the free rider problem and it is a problem but it isn't as absolute as you're making it out. People could invest in public projects conditional on others doing so. There are non-excluding ways to generate revenue such as advertising, sponsorships, and crowdfunding.

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@801formal_llama @Ace_Archist I don't have an in-principle objection to private parks. It depends on what society at large is like, and I believe overall it would be better under anarchy. I'm just saying there'd likely also be non-private non-state parks.

[Nikolai Rostov 🇦🇹🇺🇸 @austrosillyism]

Polanyi: real free market capitalism has been tried and it failed.

Rothbard: real free market capitalism has never been tried.

Marx: real free market capitalism was historically progressive and a development of the productive forces, but the state was a tool of the bourgeoise and eventually its contradictions will prove irreconcilable.

Mises: real free market capitalism has been tried and it was glorious.

Schumpeter: real free market capitalism has been tried and it was glorious, but its contradictions will (unfortunately) prove irreconciliable.

Keynes: real free market capitalism (the Manchester system) has been tried and its very good, buuuuuut we should save it from its contradictions (socialise the quantity of aggregate demand btw)

Lachmann: huhhhhh what “market” I just took the last of our crack

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@801formal_llama @Ace_Archist Your statement strikes me as obviously false. They already largely do or don't because of the state. Bodily and property security is one of the top priorities of most people.

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@theCeeDee @801formal_llama @HoppeanGhoul Classical utilitarianism is based anyways

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@801formal_llama @Ace_Archist Aka security services and crime insurance.

As you keep saying, with no elboration or substance.

[realjudeleelind @judeleelind]

@801formal_llama @Ace_Archist The idea is that they do so (perhaps indirectly via established norm) because the cost of refusing to do so is greater. If you went against a mediated ruling, you'd risk rising insurance costs, market blacklisting, and public backlash.