Sean J

[Sean J @juergy]

@Tuccrr Flexing the day 1 mastery 30 tarantula I see you

[Sean J @juergy]

@DekksterGaming @Clayton_Crain Hope these help

[Sean J @juergy]

@Matty_KCSN Already not impressed by the amount of separation on the route

[Sean J @juergy]

@marmank87 @hbtCHIEFS My point at any rate is this:
All of these conversations have far more nuance to them than many analysts give. The NFL offseason is akin to doing my grocery shopping at aldi. Am I getting everything I could possibly want? No chance, but you make the most of what’s available

[Sean J @juergy]

@marmank87 @hbtCHIEFS I think the CEH/Covid draft is almost a wash from a process standpoint. So much weirdness that year that you kinda have to throw it out
Moore was not bad process, just bad results.
Hardman is a fair knock. And the one I think most people had the most problems with at that time

[Sean J @juergy]

@hbtCHIEFS Oh sure I don’t mean to rag on him specifically. You see a lot of this type of “analysis” I just wish it was taken one more step and not just random directionless musings

[Sean J @juergy]

@hbtCHIEFS I’m not either! Haha it’s just like the analysis of “they should do something” but then you look at it more than glancing at a roster and it makes sense why they didn’t

[Sean J @juergy]

@hbtCHIEFS It’s kind of like the WR situation to me. They should’ve addressed WR but like how? Over draft someone they don’t have rated highly? Trade for someone? Takes two sides to tango unless your overpaying

[Sean J @juergy]

@hbtCHIEFS This kind of take mystifies me.(his not yours) What of the available options should they have taken then? Don’t do what other teams did but do “something”

Such as…?

[Sean J @juergy]

@RealBirdLawyer Not trying to argue with you but surely “house of lowlights” is a credible source of ball knowledge

[Sean J @juergy]

@JacobMorley Should’ve had Kirko standing with him tbh

[Sean J @juergy]

@ThatGuySigh @Cenjin_02 @Ishtaruku @KMBestMS @MARVELSNAP More support through other cards seems like a good solve. I agree at a lower cost he’d need a worse ability. It’s hard. He’s a pretty underrated card in general.

[Sean J @juergy]

@Cenjin_02 @ThatGuySigh @Ishtaruku @KMBestMS @MARVELSNAP You don’t always control when a card is discarded or destroyed, you do always control when you press the activate button. And as an objective the quest becomes more restrictive not less.

[Sean J @juergy]

@Cenjin_02 @ThatGuySigh @Ishtaruku @KMBestMS @MARVELSNAP My opinion is expressly my own. And I suspect I play way more Fantomex than average. How is objective better? You have less agency over when the ability happens. There are definitely more compelling lines with him as an activate than as an objective outside of “playing him on t6”

[Sean J @juergy]

@ThatGuySigh @Ishtaruku @KMBestMS @MARVELSNAP Which is unlikely. You also can’t layer the ability between your plays anymore if he’s objective. It’s a nerf all around except, to KM’s point, simplicity. It’s not a card warranting a nerf at present either so…

[Sean J @juergy]

@ThatGuySigh @Ishtaruku @KMBestMS @MARVELSNAP No. You can’t play him out on 4 (or 5) if you have both discarded and destroyed already

[Sean J @juergy]

@KMBestMS @MARVELSNAP As an objective he would restrict your play pattern more though

[Sean J @juergy]

@RealMNchiefsfan I wonder how much of this was a conscious decision not to improve the offense or if they simply didn’t like what was available for the costs they were available for.