From a friend:
‘There's lots of media coverage today about the "women's toilets guidance".
Unfortunately, most of it is nonsense. So...
The current law has been in place since 2010.
Lots of people simply ignored it, or pretended they didn't understand it before.
It's VERY simple. Service Providers who have facilities or services open to the public, or employees, which are for men & women, can only provide them on the basis of sex. Not identity.
This isn't just about loos. It's all services, so women's
Rape Crisis centres
Domestic Violence centres
Prisons
Changing Rooms
Sports
Hospital wards
Homeless shelters
Breastfeeding groups
Lesbian groups
This applies at work & in schools too, but slightly differently.
At work your employer MUST provide either separate loos & changing rooms for men & women (based on biology, not identity) or completely self-contained, single-user facilities.
Sometimes public facilities can be provided on a unisex basis, as long as they're labelled as such.
Schools cannot offer multi-user mixed sex facilities AT ALL. This includes shared hand washing areas.
This has ALWAYS been the legal case, even before the law in 2010, the Sex Discrimination Act of 1975 said the same.
There's a reason why this is being reported as a toilet law. That's because it's VERY difficult to argue that males should be allowed to use facilities like women's rape crisis centres, without coming across as an evil degenerate.
So, it's not new & it's not just toilets.
Anyone who thinks Women shouldn't have services and provision exclusively for Women please fu*k off and when you get there fu*k off some more.’
This grotesque, hand wringing, middle class white guilt is why Sarah Mullally handed over Church of England money intended for other people. These people are so out of touch with most Brits.
<<Cambridge hired Arday after ‘listening to black students’>>
https://t.co/gT4yy4JWs6
I studied at a reputable UK university, and trust me, there are so many of these woke clowns in positions of power, fawning over different ethnicities and religions whilst putting meritocracy second.
This woke nonsense is a security threat to the UK's future prosperity, 100%
"Sorif Uddin, a 28-year-old former taxi driver from Lozells, Birmingham, AVOIDED immediate imprisonment despite pleading guilty to viciously whipping his wife with a belt and subsequently strangling her."
A suspended sentence because, and I quote, his mother and sisters were financially dependent on him.
https://t.co/VmNunPNKDf
Dear @UniofOxford,
As a British Muslim, I find this deeply embarrassing.
Refraining from violence is not an act of “generosity”—it is the bare minimum expected in a civilised society.
You don’t defend Islam—or any other belief—by suggesting that its supporters generously decided not to become a lynch mob.
The smug self-righteousness on display is astonishing. Instead of engaging with the issues, this speaker resorted to a sneering personal attack on @TRobinsonNewEra, achieving nothing except reinforcing
his argument in the eyes of his supporters.
Shame on you!
its a joke actually! The new Labour mayor was elected by just 12% of the eligible 2.1 million citizens.
Manchester voted against having an elected city mayor in 2012. But they were ignored and politicians created a much more powerful Greater Manchester mayoralty without asking voters in a referendum.
I’m not sure Burn’em or Labour can claim much of a democratic mandate under those circumstances.
In the Harry Potter books, there is a pub called the Leaky Cauldron, which Muggles – non-magic people – mysteriously never notice, even when they’re walking right past it. Beira’s Place in Edinburgh, the sexual violence support centre set up by JK Rowling in 2022, has a similarly unobtrusive air. Google Maps leads me to the right building, yet somehow I meander past it and have to double back.
🔗 https://t.co/RayRYVc2Pv
Rewilding has been blamed for triggering the wildfire in Suffolk.
The fire, which is just a few miles from Sizewell B nuclear power station and the construction site for the new Sizewell C, continues to blaze into a fourth day.
🔗 https://t.co/RTohzBrxVx
'Anything won on behalf of the country should be tax free.'
John Charlton, son of 1966 England World Cup hero Jack Charlton, tells @TomSwarbrick1 he must pay £200,000 to keep his father’s medal.
Chaos is 2yrs old and despite his name he is a very sweet and friendly boy who has loved everyone he has met. Chaos can live with older kids and possibly another dog with correct intros
#germanshepherd#dogs#Essex
https://t.co/Zc7CgGewaK
The number of injured in Kyiv following Russia's massive attack has risen to 33. Nine people were killed.
📹: Horrifying footage of Russian strikes on Kyiv overnight
(Sound on, if you can)
Jack Charlton’s son has given up his father’s World Cup medal over the inheritance tax bill…
John Charlton handed the heirloom to his mother to avoid a £200,000 HMRC demand following his father’s death in 2020.
So Jack Charlton won a medal for his country and our Government wants his family to pay tax on it when he dies.
A World Cup gold medal no less, the most prized possession in all of sports.
Shame, Shame, SHAME.
Our country has warped and our government is anti-British.
“Dogs definitely have a place in society, just not as indoor pets”.
So before you choke on your oatmeal over this week’s most divisive quote, let me just say that trying to ban dogs is very much in the extremists playbook.
The call to ban dogs as pets here in NYC was fully expected but opponents of Mamdani were warned that to mention this would open up claims of “Islamophobia” because the public would not believe them.
So here it is.
From one of Mamdani’s closest allies.
Almost on cue.
Radical extremists like Keswani do not hide their disdain for dogs, and their desire to force their religious views on everyone else. In Wales, for example, extremists tried to ban dogs in parks for religious reasons but got public pushback.
Good luck trying to get New Yorkers to give up their dogs.
And by the way, Muslim- Americans in our family and friend circle love dogs, and especially my dog Willow. Their kids beg for dogs because dogs are fantastic, great for companionship, help to keep kids calm, fun to be with and are a great way for children to learn to give and receive care and love. People are entitled to their religious beliefs and I believe dogs manifest love and beauty.
Many unwanted dogs need homes so I will add a public service announcement: adopt a dog today!
Happy Valentines Day!
@OneCityRisingNY@JCAndersonNYC@RezaC1@katiewr31413491@KathleenWood730@NotNiceDavid@TheKvetcher@stick_dynamite@queens_parents
Two police officers came to my home because I spoke up for laboratory beagles.
MBR Acres complained about one of my Instagram reels and I was accused of an offence under the Online Safety Act.
My reel was based on evidence I believed to be genuine, including a Stericycle hazardous waste consignment note, whistleblower information and corroborating Home Office correspondence. I refused to admit guilt because I had done nothing dishonest.
After my solicitor explained the evidence behind my reel, Cambridgeshire Police took no further action and closed the investigation.
But the wider issue remains.
If people can face a police investigation for speaking on a matter of public interest, backed by evidence they believed to be true, then freedom of expression in Britain is under real pressure.
We should all be asking ourselves: what kind of country do we want to be? One where citizens can question powerful organisations without fear, or one where people begin to think twice before speaking because they worry the police may come knocking at their door?
It made me think of Orwell’s 1984. Not because Britain is that society, but because the fear of speaking freely is how societies begin to silence themselves.
My conscience is clear. I don’t lie. I speak from the heart and I do everything I reasonably can to ensure what I publish is evidence-based.
I will never stop standing up for animals, and I will never be intimidated into silence.
Free speech isn’t tested when everyone agrees with you. It’s tested when people have the right to question powerful interests without fearing the consequences. We must protect that right.
#FreeSpeech #Article10 #OnlineSafetyAct #AnimalWelfare #Beagles #MBRAcres #FreedomOfExpression #UnitedKingdom #breakingnews