micromanaging is toxic for humans
it’s essential for AI
AI doesn’t think
it executes
the difference between average and great is the details you bothered to define
@clarkcharlie03@thiingsco very nice. instead of static collection I think you should let users generate any icon with a prompt and charge based on usage
@danshipper Analysis is great start. Next step is let agents talk to users. Even better—let micro user interviews be auto triggered from Posthog events @Usercallco
@bnj Yes. In addition to personal taste, judgement and experience, you need real user insights to ground them. AI is lacking on this front but now AI agents can talk to users for you as well https://t.co/X2yvTfjqKa
@DJbennyBuff@SlackHQ@meetgranola@sentry One missing signal is capturing why right when behavior happens. Product events triggering quick user conversations could feed that layer
@signulll And knowing what to build is easy as having ideas. Knowing what to build that users actually need requires talking to them. And now AI is also helping to do that - https://t.co/XoWBlFkMEj
@aakashgupta Knowing what to build is easy as having ideas. Knowing what to build that users need requires talking to them. And now AI is also helping to do that - https://t.co/XoWBlFkMEj
@signulll Feels right. When building gets easier, judgment becomes the bottleneck.
The shared model of “why” also works best when it’s grounded in real user conversations. The signals from what users do and why they say shape both what to build and how to frame it