gjbd

surviving the “nows”, hoping for better tomorrows 💕

[lex 🌸 @aleeexish]

women will always be better than men 🙂‍↕️

[gjbd @jurisamore]

WTS LFB

MORGAN JAY - OCTOBER 14 | 9:30 PM

2 pax (Row B15-16)
Only for Php 6k for both.

RFS: Nabuntis, baka dun pa ako manganak hahah October din po due date ko eh 🤣

Bilhin niyo na please 🙏🏽

[gjbd @jurisamore]

Emma D’Arcy -/ what a fine specimen of a human being you are!!!!

[gjbd @jurisamore]

funny enough na wala parang pa 1 year pa lang kami ni Adam, alam ko na talaga anong date ng kasal namin 😂 so often times i’ll tell him “basta ako feb 2028 ikakasal”

[gjbd @jurisamore]

pag stress talaga ako, iniisip ko na lang na ikakasal ako sa feb 2028 😂

[gjbd @jurisamore]

i dont know how much my facebook monthly subscription helps sa mga animal rescues but i hope it does. in this way, alam ko every month may unti ako natatabi for them

[gjbd @jurisamore]

grateful for the provisions talaga since di talaga mahirap maglipat ng files for every upgrade 🙏

[gjbd @jurisamore]

pag talaga nasa apple ecosystem ka, di na makalaya hayst hahaha nagstart lang ako sa simpleng apple iPod touch nung HS, tapos eto na several gadgets later

[gjbd @jurisamore]

parang gusto ko maging BCC hahahaha

[gjbd @jurisamore]

still praying for a better job and greater pay

[gjbd @jurisamore]

savings for my future while saving for my baby while saving for my wedding while trying to live in this economy is exhausting

[gjbd @jurisamore]

i feel stuck

[KYRIO🥀 @KyrioCifer]

i'm in a really bad place rn

not mentally, just in the philippines

[steven yeuniverse @beeyonceknight]

🚨 CINEMALAYA films you can legally stream for FREE.

a thread with links and movie descriptions.

[​𝐥𝐲𝐫𝐚 @sunnkssdseraph]

Pregnancy wasn't 50/50.
Birth wasn't 50/50.
Breastfeeding wasn't 50/50.
The mental load wasn't 50/50.
Postpartum recovery wasn't 50/50.
The sleepless nights weren't 50/50.
The physical changes weren't 50/50.
By the time the bills came, she had already paid in ways a man never could.

[BA (ᜊ) @bumaBAgyo]

nang vs ng

[Atty. Aimee Venteroso, CPA @aimeevntrso]

This is outside the coverage of the 2026 Bar Examinations, but I would humbly like to share the updated matrix I prepared based on the one provided by the Supreme Court in People v. Tulagan, G.R. No. 227363, March 12, 2019, incorporating the Court's guidance in Gramatica v. People, G.R. Nos. 260233 & 266039, August 12, 2025.

In Gramatica, the Supreme Court clarified the delineation between the related crimes under the Revised Penal Code (RPC) and Section 5(b) of R.A. No. 7610. It explained that the distinction does not rest solely on the age of the victim, but also whether the minor engages in sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct due to the to being exploited in prostitution or other sexual abuse, and on the presence of apparent consent.

Under the RPC, there is no valid consent due to the victim's incapacity to consent (as in statutory rape or acts of lasciviousness involving a child below 16 years of age, or where the victim is demented), or because of force, intimidation, fraud, deprivation of reason, or grave abuse of authority. In contrast, the offenses punished under Section 5(b) of R.A. No. 7610 involve situations where consent may appear to exist but is, in reality, defective. It contemplates a situation where the minor allows, yields, or participates in the act not through free will but because of the coercion or influence exerted by the adult. Such coercion or influence is distinct from the concepts of force or intimidation under the Revised Penal Code. As the Supreme Court explained, under R.A. No. 7610, the child may seemingly "indulge" in or agree to the sexual conduct, and thus, engaging in sexual acts with a child exploited in prostitution or subjected to sexual abuse remains criminal, notwithstanding the child's apparent consent.

In the Tulagan matrix, I also added a row for AOL under the RPC, since the Supreme Court emphasized in Gramatica that not all acts of lasciviousness against minors aged 12 to under 18 are covered by RA 7610. The latter applies only when minors are subjected to sexual abuse, such as when they “indulge” or give defective consent to the conduct.

In sum, in determining the applicable law, the following must be considered:
1) The age of the victim;
2) Whether the minor engages in sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct due to being exploited in prostitution or other sexual abuse; and
3) Whether there is presence of apparent consent due to coercion and influence which does not amount to force and intimidation under the RPC.

References:
Gramatica v. People: https://t.co/j0Zckc8tfZ
People v. Tulagan: https://t.co/LCVUaYyYHi
RA 11648: https://t.co/UtQQOe9AE8

[kal @gldaydreams]

its matriarchial but the matriarch has patriarchial views

[gjbd @jurisamore]

magingat sa fake lawyers pero mas magingat sa mga lawyers na nagsstate ng opinion pero hindi man lang makapagexplain ng legal basis nila

[gjbd @jurisamore]

@bmrs__ what will u use na? hahaha