Kenapa Argentina diizinkan memakai ban lengan hitam, sementara Prancis ditolak?
Kemungkinan besar karena konteksnya berbeda. Argentina memberi penghormatan kepada Antonio Rattín, legenda sepak bola. Sementara Prancis mengajukannya untuk mengenang ibu Didier Deschamps. Itu masuk ranah pribadi.
Sependek riset saya, FIFA memang sangat jarang mengizinkan ban lengan hitam di Piala Dunia untuk urusan pribadi. Biasanya penghormatan diganti dengan minute's silence sebelum pertandingan.
Pengecualian yang paling dekat, terjadi di Piala Dunia Wanita 2023. Jepang diizinkan memakai ban lengan hitam karena ibu Princess Takamado wafat. Tapi, sang putri adalah honorary patron Federasi Sepak Bola Jepang, sehingga ada unsur resmi, bukan murni urusan keluarga.
**Catatan: Ini konteksnya hanya di Piala Dunia. Kalau di liga, penggunaan ban lengan hitam banyak digunakan juga untuk hal yang masuk ranah pribadi.
"I carry Che on my arm and in my heart. I learned his story, I learned to love him.. It was time the two greatest Argentines were united in the same body."
- Diego Maradona
🚨🚨| NEW: FIFA's decision to lift Folarin Balogun's automatic ban was taken by 𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐒𝐎𝐍 — committee chairman Mohammad Al Kamali of UAE.
None of the other 17 members were consulted. 🇺🇸
[@martynziegler]
"wow Argentina is so racist I want England, a country which has seen several pogroms and race riots this year and is actively supporting genocide to win"
Micah Richards on the officiating controversies in Croatia vs Portugal and England vs Norway.
🗣️ “I’ve had enough of this. Football cannot keep changing the rules depending on the match. Either the technology works the same for everyone, or don’t pretend it’s there to protect the game. Right now, the inconsistency is making a mockery of the biggest tournament in football.”
“Against Portugal, Croatia had a crucial goal ruled out because the ball sensor detected a touch. Fine. Then explain to me why, in England vs Norway, we’re told the sensor detected nothing when many people believed the ball had struck the camera cable before Jude Bellingham’s goal. If the ball touched the cable, the game should have been stopped immediately. You can’t have one standard on Tuesday and a completely different one on Wednesday.”
“Then you look at Norway’s disallowed goal. I’ve watched it over and over again. The contact between Haaland and Anderson was minimal. That wasn’t enough to wipe out a goal in a World Cup knockout game. Football is becoming so obsessed with finding reasons to cancel goals that we’re forgetting what real fouls actually look like.”
“How are players supposed to trust the system when nobody seems to know how it’s being applied? One match the technology is treated as absolute truth, the next match it’s apparently ignored. That’s not consistency that’s chaos.”
“Norway have every right to be furious. They didn’t just lose a football match they leave wondering whether the same laws of the game were applied equally. That’s a terrible look for the sport.”
“And don’t tell me people would react the same way if another one of football’s biggest nations had been on the wrong end of these decisions. The outrage would be deafening. FIFA and the officials have serious questions to answer because fans deserve transparency, players deserve consistency and football deserves far better than this.”
Terima kasih kembali kak @A_GitaJKT48 untuk usaha dan kerja kerasnya hingga saat ini! 🙌
Gita Instagram Feed
🔗https://t.co/RGLD3uszAh
#LaFagmilia#GitaGifted25th
🚨 Jamie Carragher responds to Rio Ferdinand's VAR comments after Argentina's win
🗣️: "I've got to be honest, I didn't expect someone as experienced as Rio Ferdinand to come out with a statement like that. Saying you've 'never seen VAR review a yellow card' simply isn't true. We've already seen it in this World Cup when Amiron received a second yellow for simulation after a VAR review. So let's not pretend this is something that was invented because Argentina were playing.
What frustrates me is that every time Argentina win, the conversation immediately shifts from football to conspiracy theories. Instead of talking about how they played, people are searching for a referee decision, a VAR angle or something they can use to discredit Messi. That's not objective analysis, that's looking for a reason to avoid giving credit where it's belongs.
You don't have to support Argentina or Messi, but you should at least be consistent. If a decision is correct in one match, it doesn't suddenly become corruption because it benefits Argentina in another. Football deserves better analysis than that."
Atléti erat sama Argentina ya karena Cholo, membawa budaya Cholismo, Charra Garrua, Menottismo, dan Mistica. Kalau sama Messi, Cholo sendiri menghargai Messi layaknya dia menghargai "abang-abangan"-nya, Maradona.
Tapi sebetulnya sejak 1960-an Atléti sangat erat dengan Amerika Latin karena pemainnya didominasi Argentina dan Uruguay, makanya disebut Los Indios, dan kala itu juga Real disebut Los Vikingos karena lebih sering merekrut pemain Eropa Utara, Jerman dan Denmark.