The current circulating narrative that Hanni committed perjury after Min Hee-Jin instructed her to claim the other team mocked her is false.
The current reports discuss Min Hee-Jinโs alleged involvement in crafting NewJeansโ legal strategy for the lawsuit, including suggesting phrasing about โmockery by words and actionsโ, and court analysis of the โignore herโ (โ๋ฌด์ํดโ) phrase originating in Min Hee-Jinโs messages rather than proving Hanni fabricated events.
The claim by ADOR is that Min Hee-Jin suggested the phrasing that Hanni had been targeted with mockery โthrough words and actionsโ, and alleges Min Hee-Jin instructed adding this to the court filings. Not that Min Hee-Jin told Hanni to make the โignore herโ claim. This is an entirely different point.
Court conclusions, drawn from KakaoTalk chats, CCTV, and testimony, reached no finding of deliberate lying or perjury by Hanni.
Hanniโs original account of the incident never named specific members or the group and explicitly noted the managerโs role in directing the ignoring behavior, making it clear that this problem solely lies between her, the BELIFT Manager, and ADOR.
Any further misunderstanding is not at the fault of Hanni.
Againโฆ as for the AAO contract, it does existโฆ but it was a performance contract, not an exclusive management contract. It wasnโt a contract for AAO to take over ADORโs role or manage the members. Itโs a contract sign to perform at ComplexCon.
A double contract occurs when the same person or group is bound by two overlapping contracts that create conflicting obligationsโฆ for example, being signed exclusively to two different agencies at the same time. That isnโt what happened here.
I hope that clears things up.
The deliberate misuse of term and the lack of context by people discussing this online makes this very confusing for a lot of people.
ador: the witnesses are worried that if their identities are disclosed, they'll be subjected to cyberbullying.
live reporter: swear i've heard this in every hybe lawsuit at this point. (ashfjhsadnoshitkjskfhdsg)
โผ๏ธAccording to K-Bunnies who attended the hearing, the articles currently being circulated are false.
They say that none of the claims reported in those articles were actually presented in court during the hearing.
They suspect that the reports were likely based on a press release distributed to journalists rather than on what was actually argued in the courtroom.