Dean Druckenmiller @justhrow - Twitter Profile

@mikestanislaw Peace and safety in the Middle East and around the world. With that brings hopefully a free market and lower petro prices. That’s the long term.

2

0

18

Dean Druckenmiller @justhrow

3 months ago

@mikestanislaw I meant I never got that impression from high command. And what is defined as “quickly”?

2

0

23

Dean Druckenmiller @justhrow

3 months ago

@mikestanislaw Interesting point

Marc Gravely

@MarcGravely

3 months ago

Yesterday, I explained how seven insurance firms in London shut down one-fifth of the world's oil supply. Today, Trump may have just made the most aggressive sovereign insurance play in modern history. Here's what happened and why it matters: Trump ordered the U.S. Development Finance Corporation to immediately offer political risk insurance and guarantees to all maritime trade through the Gulf. Especially energy. Backed by Navy escorts if needed. Read that through the lens of what I described yesterday. The Strait didn't close because of missiles. It closed because the insurance market collapsed. P&I clubs pulled coverage, reinsurers withdrew, and the entire commercial shipping architecture froze. This move doesn't address the military problem. It addresses the actuarial one. The DFC is stepping into the void that Lloyd's and the London reinsurance market created when they pulled out. The U.S. government is effectively saying: we will underwrite what the private market won't. No sovereign has attempted to replace the global marine war risk market in real time during an active conflict. Here's why the structural implications are significant: 1. It challenges Lloyd's dominance. For centuries, London has been the center of gravity for marine insurance. Lloyd's and its reinsurers controlled pricing, terms, and risk appetite for global shipping. That concentration is exactly what made the actuarial blockade possible. A handful of firms in one city froze global oil flows. The DFC offering competitive political risk coverage to all shipping lines is a direct challenge to that architecture. If American-backed insurance proves cheaper and more reliable during crises, shippers may not return to London when the dust settles. 2. It breaks the actuarial blockade. I said yesterday that China has massive leverage over Iran but zero leverage over Lloyd's. The same was true of every oil-producing and oil-consuming nation watching their economies choke. This goes around the insurance market entirely. If the DFC covers the voyage and the Navy escorts the tanker, the ships sail. Oil flows. The spreadsheet blockade breaks. 3. It redirects billions in premium revenue. War risk premiums in the Gulf are currently running at extreme multiples — 3× to 5× pre-conflict rates. Those premiums were flowing to London reinsurers who then pulled coverage anyway. Now those premiums flow to Washington. At rates the DFC can set below the panicked London market, while still generating substantial returns. The same shippers get cheaper coverage. The revenue just changes continents. 4. It creates a chokepoint within the chokepoint. The Strait of Hormuz is already the world's most critical energy bottleneck. If the U.S. is both insurer and naval escort, America controls access at two levels: physical security and financial coverage. No other nation can replicate that. You need the world's dominant navy and a sovereign balance sheet large enough to backstop the risk. Only one country has both. 5. It reassures every stakeholder simultaneously. Gulf producers were watching exports freeze. Asian and European consumers were watching energy prices spike. Both feared the Iran campaign would wreck their economies. One announcement addressed all of them: your oil will move, your ships will be covered, and the rates will be reasonable. Yesterday I described a system with no TARP, no Fed equivalent, no backstop at global scale. This may be the first attempt to build one in real time, during the crisis itself. The actuarial blockade just met a sovereign counterparty.

MarcGravely's tweet photo. Yesterday, I explained how seven insurance firms in London shut down one-fifth of the world's oil supply.

Today, Trump may have just made the most aggressive sovereign insurance play in modern history.

Here's what happened and why it matters:

Trump ordered the U.S. Development Finance Corporation to immediately offer political risk insurance and guarantees to all maritime trade through the Gulf. Especially energy. Backed by Navy escorts if needed.

Read that through the lens of what I described yesterday.

The Strait didn't close because of missiles. It closed because the insurance market collapsed. P&I clubs pulled coverage, reinsurers withdrew, and the entire commercial shipping architecture froze.

This move doesn't address the military problem. It addresses the actuarial one.

The DFC is stepping into the void that Lloyd's and the London reinsurance market created when they pulled out. The U.S. government is effectively saying: we will underwrite what the private market won't.

No sovereign has attempted to replace the global marine war risk market in real time during an active conflict. Here's why the structural implications are significant:

1. It challenges Lloyd's dominance.

For centuries, London has been the center of gravity for marine insurance. Lloyd's and its reinsurers controlled pricing, terms, and risk appetite for global shipping.

That concentration is exactly what made the actuarial blockade possible. A handful of firms in one city froze global oil flows.

The DFC offering competitive political risk coverage to all shipping lines is a direct challenge to that architecture. If American-backed insurance proves cheaper and more reliable during crises, shippers may not return to London when the dust settles.

2. It breaks the actuarial blockade.

I said yesterday that China has massive leverage over Iran but zero leverage over Lloyd's. The same was true of every oil-producing and oil-consuming nation watching their economies choke.

This goes around the insurance market entirely. If the DFC covers the voyage and the Navy escorts the tanker, the ships sail. Oil flows. The spreadsheet blockade breaks.

3. It redirects billions in premium revenue.

War risk premiums in the Gulf are currently running at extreme multiples — 3× to 5× pre-conflict rates. Those premiums were flowing to London reinsurers who then pulled coverage anyway.

Now those premiums flow to Washington. At rates the DFC can set below the panicked London market, while still generating substantial returns. The same shippers get cheaper coverage. The revenue just changes continents.

4. It creates a chokepoint within the chokepoint.

The Strait of Hormuz is already the world's most critical energy bottleneck. If the U.S. is both insurer and naval escort, America controls access at two levels: physical security and financial coverage.

No other nation can replicate that. You need the world's dominant navy and a sovereign balance sheet large enough to backstop the risk. Only one country has both.

5. It reassures every stakeholder simultaneously.

Gulf producers were watching exports freeze. Asian and European consumers were watching energy prices spike. Both feared the Iran campaign would wreck their economies.

One announcement addressed all of them: your oil will move, your ships will be covered, and the rates will be reasonable.

Yesterday I described a system with no TARP, no Fed equivalent, no backstop at global scale.

This may be the first attempt to build one in real time, during the crisis itself.

The actuarial blockade just met a sovereign counterparty.

537

14K

4K

3K

1M

1

0

20

Dean Druckenmiller @justhrow

3 months ago

@mikestanislaw When a country targets civilians and non-military targets that usually means they are running out of options and grabbing for straws. like the kamikazi concept of WW2

0

1

0

12