Every AI failed my challenge until #Fable: Could AI rebuild and reboot my favorite childhood game, the 1990s shareware MacOS Classic game Rescue! by Tom Spreen? About 25M tokens later, the story had an amazing ending.
Every AI failed my challenge until #Fable: Could AI rebuild and reboot my favorite childhood game, the 1990s shareware MacOS Classic game Rescue! by Tom Spreen? About 25M tokens later, the story had an amazing ending.
Fable and ChatGPT Sol still miss a lot - they don't understand the point of the decompiled code. But they can read it and answer my requests successfully, finally!
Every AI failed my challenge until #Fable: Could AI rebuild and reboot my favorite childhood game, the 1990s shareware MacOS Classic game Rescue! by Tom Spreen? About 25M tokens later, the story had an amazing ending.
Decompilation turns finished machine code back into readable source. But names, types and intent are gone. Different recipes can bake into similar instructions. Plausible-looking answers can be completely wrong. Claude Opus 4 spent 10 million tokens trying to decompile it in 2025. The result used the graphics from the game, but Opus kept giving up and building it's own 'space game' from the wreckage.
Every AI failed my challenge until #Fable: Could AI rebuild and reboot my favorite childhood game, the 1990s shareware MacOS Classic game Rescue! by Tom Spreen? About 25M tokens later, the story had an amazing ending.
No accounts, no ads, no analytics. Nothing leaves the phone.
If you have an iPhone and a kid somewhere around 5โ9, I'd love your help beta testing. Reply or DM and I'll send you the TestFlight link ๐
My kid always knows when I'm losing on purpose.
So I built Family Chess โ an iPhone app for playing chess with your kid. One phone, flat on the table between you.
It's ready for beta testers. Here's how it works ๐งต
It's built for brand-new players: tap a piece and glowing dots show every legal move, and a golden trail marks what just happened.
Also: eleven piece styles. My kids argue about which one is correct. There is no correct one.