I'm truly amazed that some people describe Gad Saad as an intellectual.
The objective/purpose of debate is not to convince the other side, but help inform the audience in forming judgements.
How any Prof/Teacher is unaware of this beggars belief.
Trying to connect the dots between psychological breakdowns and frequency weapons. Based on a recent conversation with @67_podcast - Just a theory of what might be happening with people like Nicholas Jordan Wagter.
#conspiracy#frequency#mindcontrol#voicetoskull#mkultra
The year is 1949.
The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain.
The year is 1956.
Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over.
The year is 1966.
A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots.
The year is 1979.
Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005.
The year is 1985.
Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning.
The year is 1992.
There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with.
So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now.
Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one.
It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.
💥BREAKING: CPC MP Dean Allison annouces a 4-day inquiry into the Trudeau Government's COVID-19 response—with the explicit goal of triggering a full public inquiry into the crimes committed against the Canadian people.
Carney's purge of Trudeau loyalists is starting to make more sense.
This short video explains the depth of the Canadian problems.
1. Inane Municipal governments pass bylaws to curfew public beaches after sunset in violation of the Charter
2. Officious law enforcement follow the inane Municipal bylaws and threaten arrests.
3. Canadian citizens allow themselves to be intimidated and acquiesce to the complete absurdity.
💥WILD: RCMP officers roll up at dusk to enforce a lockdown of Wreck Beach in Vancouver, BC.
Your replacements will obey the government's police state agenda.
The level of control is getting insane. 8 billion people controlled down to fine detail by a relative handful because they allow themselves to be divided and thus ruled. Tragic.
There aren’t many people as courageous as this man…
I wish we had more like him holding politicians to account.
Canadian politician Chrystia Freeland, Canada's former deputy prime minister and finance minister, was confronted during an event at the Miles Nadal Jewish Community Centre in Toronto.
We are all not angry enough. Freeland needed to be confronted this way. @cafreeland is complicit in the Palestinian genocide and should be legally held to account. Beyond that, she was the worst MP in my life as a constituent, and her staffers were openly hostile to some of my clients who were immigrant constituents in need of MP services.
“Thousands murdered because of you. How many children have you orphaned? You monster. You Z10NIST NAZI DOG...”
Activist confronted Canadian politician Chrystia Freeland, Canada's former deputy PM and finance minister at the Miles Nadal Jewish Community Centre in Toronto.