@NancyMace@CaitlinYorkSC Girl you miss everything! I posted on your messenger account a lot about the dangers of school choice and you endorse candidates that promote that trap . The candidates you endorsed for SC governor are Aspen Institute members which promote Marxist/Freemasons ideology 🤦🏻
South Carolina Darline Graham Nordone’s entire claim to a U.S. Senate seat is biological.
She has never won an election. She has never held elected office of any kind. Her public record of political positions is almost nonexistent beyond “my brother was wonderful.” Her résumé is mid-level state bureaucracy, vocational rehab, workforce boards, Commission for the Blind, respectable enough for a career public administrator, laughable as preparation for one of the most powerful legislative bodies on earth.
Yet here she is, interim senator by appointment, Trump-endorsed candidate, and the clear beneficiary of a party that suddenly discovered family loyalty is more important than competence, record, or voter mandate. South Carolina Republicans certified her for the primary even amid open questions about whether she even meets their own new voting-history rules. The message is unmistakable: the seat is not a public trust, it is a Graham family asset to be passed along like a house or a boat.
Americans love to sneer at dynasties when the name is Kennedy, Bush, or Clinton. When the name is Graham and the process is a rushed appointment followed by a coronation primary, the same people call it “honoring Lindsey’s legacy.” That is not conservatism. That is hereditary politics with a Southern accent.
If Darline Nordone were not Lindsey Graham’s sister, she would not be within a hundred miles of this race. The meme is right. South Carolina voters are being asked to treat a U.S. Senate seat like a sentimental keepsake. That is an insult to the office and to every qualified Republican who actually had to earn their way there.
Supreme Court Data
Privacy Ruling Threatens EdTech That Tracks
Students' Parents 24/7
Do students still have Fourth Amendment rights?
By: Rhonda Thomas
https://t.co/lFYMDQiWC3
Let me do my best to explain.
When our legislators created the Education Scholarship Trust Fund, or ESTF, the law opened a pathway for homeschoolers to access taxpayer funding under “personal learning.”
When legislators discovered this, many said that was never their intent and questioned whether it was legal. Independent homeschoolers were not supposed to be eligible.
They introduced S.692 to address this new category of homeschoolers, referred to as “unbundlers.” These families do not fall under Options 1, 2, or 3 in the program. That’s a problem.
S.692 failed.
Legislators then tried to stop additional homeschoolers from entering the program through a budget proviso while they worked out a permanent solution. That proviso failed too. (That’s what the video above is about.)
So, the pathway remains open, and homeschool families can continue using ESTF funds.
Now the bigger problem is brewing.
Once government funding enters homeschooling, families begin to rely on it. As participation and dependency grow, pressure builds to protect and expand these government funds. Legislators will then define eligibility, spending rules, compliance requirements, and oversight.
It also puts homeschooling under a brighter spotlight. When the state funds homeschool families, agencies have more reason to scrutinize how homeschoolers educate their children and impose additional requirements.
Oh and the unbundler category issue is not settled. S.692 failed, but legislators will still have to deal with the unbundler category, which means another bill will likely return.
Michelle Luft has written about these concerns, and she is happy to explain more. Feel free to message her.
And please let other homeschoolers know.
U.S. Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. A federal judge ordered the U.S. Department of Justice to produce the unredacted documents. The DOJ has refused to hand over Epstein files after a judge's order. The deadline was July 2, 2026.
As someone works in human rights, I’ve never seen anything like the Epstein files in my 15-year career. There are 3 million files of documented evidence about powerful men who
Raped
Cannibalized
Trafficked
Filmed
Terrorized
Tortured
Murdered
13, 14, 15 year children!
Remember: this is a minority of the files. This's just what they were willing to release.
Not a single arrest or investigation. ZERO.
We called on the U.S. Department of Justice to hand over the full Epstein files to the UN Special Rapporteurs and UN independent committees for investigations, as this is an international case of crimes against humanity. But the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN's top human rights official didn't even care to open an investigation or listen to our call for the DoJ, nor utter a single word regarding the largest human trafficking network in modern history.
Epstein pedophiles are investigating Epstein files. We wonder why nobody arrested. Jeffery Epstein has every major politicians and billionaires on video doing something terrible to a child or to multiple people.
THOUSANDS have been arrested for criticizing Zionism. THOUSANDS have been arrested for social media posts. ZERO have been arrested for raping children.
The Epstein files is never really about just a "list." It is about children raped by powerful men, and a system that let them get away with it.
The bottom line here is the world system has become so corrupt that the time has come I think to clean the crap out of the stables and start over.
The Epstein files is about protecting children. There's no greater cause. If people can't unite over children being raped and abused there's no hope for humanity.
I don't understand how we're not having a global revolution right now.
The momentum is building.
It's time for a successful businessman, an outsider not another career politician.
Let's finish this fight.
Vote Mark Lynch for U.S. Senate Tuesday August 11th
I've been through the fire. I'm proven. I'm an overcomer.
Those lessons have guided me in business as I face impossible odds every day. And I believe we can apply those same lessons in Washington.
If God can transform a life, He can help us transform our country.
Let's get to work.
Vote Mark Lynch, Tuesday August 11th
Ralph Norman Facing Backlash For Pressure Campaign and Federal Grants That Brought Silfab to Fort Mill. @RepRalphNorman https://t.co/GfQCKCGlYw via @clt_stories
Every camera. Every scan. Every data point.
They call it "public safety."
I call it mass surveillance.
Government should answer to the people not track the people.
It's time to end the surveillance state.
Vote Mark Lynch for U.S. Senate
Tuesday August 11th
South Carolina Mark Lynch wants to BAN Flock cameras.
He’s the only candidate saying it clearly, these warrantless license-plate dragnets are mass surveillance of law-abiding South Carolinians.
When four officers in the Greenville area get fired in one week for abusing the exact same system, the “public safety” excuse falls apart.
Government should answer to the people, not track them. Ban Flock. Vote Mark Lynch August 11th.
@JungleBall_2 Greenville county just table a resolution last week to put more cell towers. I presented the following article to the Greenville county council
https://t.co/KmFNDuxjk8
I am convinced that our redemption is drawing near!
That is exactly why I stepped away from the constant flow of news.
That is also why many are no longer following.
The world is captivated by what is happening.
I am captivated by Who is coming.
Don’t be of the world.
Be in the Word!
“Therefore you also be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect.”
Matthew 24:44 (NKJV)
Wake up, South Carolina.
Darline Graham's only political donations were to Sen. Katrina Shealy, a liberal pro-choice legislator who was defeated for filibustering pro-life legislation.
Liberal Democrat Congressman Jim Clyburn posted on X about how much he loves her and how great she'll be for the state, practically endorsing her.
Liberal PBS just also practically endorsed her in a glowing puff piece.
Graham's liberal close friend just admitted to the NY Times she's not really partisan, ie she's not really a Republican, and that she won't always take Trump's side.
Who's side will she take then? Democrat Minority Leader Chuck Schumer? Because that's the only other option.
On Friday, she refused to take questions from reporters on how she would vote.
Again, wake up, South Carolina.