🇩🇪🚨Dienstag droht schmutziger Deal zur #Chatkontrolle 2.0 mit PERMANENTER Erlaubnis von Massenscans unserer privaten Chats (sog. #Suchpläne). 😱 Werden laut und mailt euren EU-Abgeordneten JETZT, um das zu verhindern:
ℹ️ https://t.co/dWaIg8jO8z
✍️ https://t.co/Axa6QXDTYA
If you're against this you are actively advocating for kids getting groomed. They dont ask for your ID or anything they literally just check your account age and your already supplied credit card. You literally arent giving them any data whatsoever.
Chipotle is working with Palantir to build a “food safety risk platform.”
Should you be worried Palantir might be tracking how much guacamole you add to your burrito? Maybe not.
But you should be worried about what it’s doing for the federal government.
🔓 LEAKED DOCUMENT 🇮🇪 Shown below is an excerpt from the leaked proposal by the Irish Presidency. The #EU Member States are expected to give their opinions by end of week. 🇪🇺 #AI#privacy
👉 Read more on our website 🔗 https://t.co/m6b8duV7Cc
Your privacy is at risk
EU Commission just tabled the Kids Act (Strasbourg, today).
Under-13s off social media. 13–14 only via parent “mini accounts” (~1h/day).
Own accounts from 15. Games + AI chatbots in scope.
Still a proposal — needs Parliament + member states.
The enforcement piece is mandatory age checks (EU age-verification app).
If this goes through, the removal of one’s anonymity would become normalised and could eventually become globalised
Hopefully the Parliament can reject it
Le Parti Pirate relaie l'appel à signer l'initiative citoyenne européenne "Stop Killing the Internet" visant à restreindre l'utilisation de la vérification de l'identité en ligne. Un tel contrôle ne doit être ni obligatoire, ni généralisé.
https://t.co/L0zWr4UF0I
They say cockroaches will outlast us all. We'd settle for outlasting your database problems. New look, same resilience: distinct parts, adapting together, make the whole stronger.
GrapheneOS opposes authoritarianism. It's a core part of why we're building privacy technology as part of a non-profit open source project. We're opposed to it regardless of whether it comes from left, center or right. The flood of people lying about what we believe and have said won't change this.
Our beliefs are not defined by what people who use GrapheneOS or donate to it believe. We decide what's acceptable within our community and we do a lot of moderation. We don't police what's done fully outside it. We clearly won't only have users, donors and supporters with beliefs aligned with ours.
We don't usually allow much political discussion in our community unless it's directly related to GrapheneOS. Today has been a very good demonstration of why that's the case. Many people are unable to tolerate even a minor disagreement on semantics without being absolutely enraged over it.