@ThoughtsColts@Peyton2L We'll have to disagree. I along with every analyst I watched on it last week thought it was good. And no doubt today the QB was the LEAST of the offensive weak links.
@ThoughtsColts@Peyton2L Ok, fantastic for a first game ever. But your implying that 17/23 for 201yds is less than really good is way more of a stretch.
@Peyton2L@ThoughtsColts His stats were fantastic last week, especially for a first game ever. How on earth could you have any other take? Because of the one fumble, that is mostly the line's fault? And today, not a QB in the league would've looked good in that "pocket"
@sccarlson I do think there's room for being convince by DCP's "Living Text" approach yet still maintaining an appreciation (& theological longing) for an "author's original" for most NT books.
@daringfireball Hehe, this quote from from your "turning on the spigot" post: "Can you even conceive of a more deliberate attack on readability than peripheral animated advertisements?"
Turns out, yes, yes we could.
@sccarlson@ChristophHeilig @JeremiahCoogan I love these enigmas. Acts is thought of as so standard[ized], and yet we really don't have a clear sense of B-text/D-text (like Tobit where we have two texts & little answers), or how the author relates to Paul's letters (for which I think Acts' geography is the best answer).