The idea that we were plugging this stupid fucking piece of shit into a 9 volt battery in order to mitigate extremely esoteric NSA level electromagnetic attacks meanwhile it had worse entropy than a fucking trezor one is just… bro WTF are we kidding with this shit???!
Just spoke to an MK3 user who didn't use dice.
Their short passphrase wasn't brute-forced yet, funds are safe. Doesn't look like they're grinding passphrases yet.
Don't wait! Create a new private key ASAP.
If you're in America, Best Buy sells @Bitkey and @ledger.
GO TO THE STORE RIGHT NOW AND GET A NEW HARDWARE DEVICE.
Italian students accused of harassing Thai woman after noise complaint on BTS train
A group of Italian students allegedly harassed a Thai woman after she asked them to lower their voices on a Bangkok BTS train, with the incident going viral on social media.
The woman said the incident happened at around 7 pm on July 23 on the BTS Silom Line near Sala Daeng station. She said the group was shouting loudly, and after she asked them to be quieter, one student allegedly replied, "Sorry for bringing money into your country." She also alleged an adult believed to be a teacher or chaperone defended the students and swore at her after she began filming.
She said several students continued shouting insults as they got off at the next station, mocked Thailand and showed her the middle finger. Another group of female students later apologized for the behaviour, she said.
The identities of the students have not been confirmed, and there has been no public statement from BTS, police or the Italian Embassy. BTS rules prohibit excessive noise and behaviour that disturbs other passengers.
#Thailand #Bangkok #วัยรุ่นอิตาลี
Adam, hunny.... this is where you simply say, brother bitcoiner, I made assumptions based on my understanding of a few non descriptive or specific conversations and I was wrong. My apologies. Build on sir.
Then see, credibility, character, and principles are protected. It really needn't be personal anyways. We are all for seperating money from state aren't we?
If there is any doubt, Giacomo never supported RDTS/110. He unambiguously warned Luke and Mechanic from the start when RDTS was only an idea, in a friendly and firm manner, that he couldn’t follow them down that path. Not to bash on anyone but for the truth to be clear.
For anyone interested about the truth: Adam Back is absolutely, overtly and veritably lying about me *ever* supporting BIP110, or even being "a fence sitter" about it.
I have always strongly, clearly and unequivocally opposed any similar fork proposal since the very earliest suggestions.
I have always been, and remain, consistently opposed to:
- using consensus rules to tackle specific types of onchain spam,
- defensively addressing any kind of "illegal data" moral panic in any possible way (mempool policies included),
- enforcing any controversial consensus change (including the ones I agree with, unlike this one) without clear full-ecosystem agreement.
It's a bit unfortunate that a very influential voice in the industry is lying about me, since I have a smaller reach to debunk him. Maybe some of you can help me by spreading the correction. Thanks.
@adam3us@ocean_mining As an insider of the company you are talking about, I can 100% guarantee you are either grossly clueless or intentionally dishonest about its internal dynamics. Most of what you said above is verifiably false.
@adam3us@BTCBeliever21@JasonGnarlee Are you ever going to address the Blockstream cloud mining ponzi allegations? Seems like they should be easy to refute. Or are you going to be cowardly and non-transparent like you were with your little alleged side visit to a a certain island?
I am one of these stupid Cat/Racoon/Frog/Dinosaur pictures on Twitter, that Tone keeps shitting on.
One of the "Knots Ideological crazies".
I was also one of the many plebs who very vocally warned about Craig Wright and BSV back in 2018/2019, and I was unlucky enough to get targeted and take the full brunt of lawfare and harassment over a five year period for speaking the obvious truth out loud.
What was Tone doing? He was doing fluff interviews and posing for selfies with Craig, like it was all a fun and relative little joke.
This is how principles, or lack of them, translates into words and actions.
And it explains why Tone is defending Core's philosophical pivot, while harshly trying to discredit and ridicule BIP-100 and Bitcoin Plebs.
Principles seem to be a foreign concept to him.
Take that into account before you listen to any advice he gives.
What you said makes no sense..
The miners works for a valuable block reward. A raspie is able to recieve unlimited amount of bitcoin.
Fees as % of total block reward is 0.52%. You aren't securing shit. Mlthe super majority of the reward comes from the subisdy. And the only way the subsidy has value is when UTXOs are in demand.
To the readers:
The people minting the JPGs (for almost nothing) are taking your bitcoin. Wake up.
Wow! This Article takes down GMAX, Andy Back, BLOCKSTREAM the company all at once.
Time to mark my Blockstream investment to $0. That’s gonna hurt.
Regime change at Blockstream is inevitable now or it blows up Ulis lawsuits.
Andy and Greg are dead.
https://t.co/fZtCtS4QXE
I've been thinking about how I would respond to this as I was mowing my lawn, because yes, I'm that kind of guy who doesn't have a stake in a billion dollar company and who doesn't get invited to private islands, the kind of guy who mows his own lawn and just does what he thinks is right in the world. You are as guilty of what I'm describing as anyone, dismissing @hodlonaut's articles as pulp and tabloid material instead of contending with the very real issues that they raise. I began and lead a FOSS project that has continued to build a useful savings tool for bitcoiners, including bitcoiners in some of the most difficult and hardest to reach parts of the world, and I've tried to steer the project to build in a way we think is in the true spirit of bitcoin. And I can confirm that portions of the grant space are captured by corporate interests and treat certain projects like shit -- I have experienced this personally and repeatedly. SeedSigner invented SeedQR and popularized the stateless approach that gave Jade a second wind after it's PIN server approach didn't resonate with bitcoiners. After I pointed this out Blockstream cut us a $2k novelty check, and we continued to get shot down by most grant orgs, save the HRF. I looked up to you so fucking hard when you did that episode of Lets Talk Bitcoin in '14 or '15, talking about sidechains and network upgrades. You were the original cypherpunk who initially overlooked bitcoin but circled back to help advance the movement after seeing the value. The truth between core and knots is somewhere in the middle. Core has a ton of eyeballs and really smart people working on it, but blowing up the op_return from 80 bytes to whatever crazy number it is was a mistake and any rational person can see that. The reasonable thing to do would be to figure out how to walk that back instead of digging into the false dichotomy this whole thing has begun. But what do I know, I'm just a 80-IQ chump nym watching you and all of the other luminaries being primarily more worried about conference junkets and lining your own pockets.
Interesting tidbit I came across in the bitcoin-wizards IRC channel from 2013 during my history research. An explanation of what blockchan<dot>org was follows in the second image.