Kairos

Verified account

@kairosfi

@UN10001

Joined December 2024

88 Following

36 Followers

64 Posts

Pinned Tweet

9 days ago

pulled five robinhood chain charts tonight and lined them up chronologically. same shape every time, way cleaner than i expected $CASHCAT july 8th, about four days to top near 225m. $TENDIES on the 16th, two three days to 34m. $GME the 23rd, 22m in roughly eight hours. $GTR the 24th, 5m in ninety minutes. $TA last night, topped at 2.4m in forty 4 days to 40 minutes in 3 weeks. time to peak is just collapsing none of them went back to the high after. not one. cashcat's had eighteen days to try and it's at 52m rn. every chart is a vertical open then oscillation underneath forever they land in the same band too, roughly a third to 45% of peak. cashcat sits lower at 23% but that run was also the most violent of the five, close to 100x off the base. steeper the candle, deeper the retrace what all five share : open distribution from minute one. no lock, no vesting, nothing. anyone early could dump straight into the first wave of buyers worth saying, i haven't seen a single robinhood launch try anything else. only gated one i've watched was $FWA on eth, couldn't buy it on the open market for fifteen days, only earned it by participating completely different shape. making higher highs three days straight, topped around 35m earlier tonight and sitting at 29.4m now. that's 84% of its peak while the robinhood five are all between 23 and 45 theirs peak at hour zero and never see it again. this one's peak is today different chain so not a clean comparison. but nobody's run that experiment on robinhood yet and it's the obvious thing nobody's trying my read on why people keep piling in is speed, not conviction. you can price a plain memecoin in three seconds. infra project makes you read docs and form a view, and by the time you've done that the entry's gone. the thing that needs the least thinking fills first which is also why the window keeps shrinking. everyone clocked the pattern so everyone's front running the same forty minutes now and your feed only loads winners. plenty launched these three weeks that never cleared 50k, nobody screenshots those. these five are just the ones that got big enough for me to notice, which is literally the bias i'm describing what actually changed this cycle is onboarding. no wallet, no bridge, no learning a dex. that's the structural bit, not sentiment real money moving here fr. but the shape repeats every time and it's accelerating. not a reason to sit out, just worth knowing which part of the curve you're standing on

kairosfi's tweet photo. pulled five robinhood chain charts tonight and lined them up chronologically. same shape every time, way cleaner than i expected

$CASHCAT july 8th, about four days to top near 225m. $TENDIES on the 16th, two three days to 34m. $GME the 23rd, 22m in roughly eight hours. $GTR the 24th, 5m in ninety minutes. $TA last night, topped at 2.4m in forty

4 days to 40 minutes in 3 weeks. time to peak is just collapsing

none of them went back to the high after. not one. cashcat's had eighteen days to try and it's at 52m rn. every chart is a vertical open then oscillation underneath forever

they land in the same band too, roughly a third to 45% of peak. cashcat sits lower at 23% but that run was also the most violent of the five, close to 100x off the base. steeper the candle, deeper the retrace

what all five share : open distribution from minute one. no lock, no vesting, nothing. anyone early could dump straight into the first wave of buyers

worth saying, i haven't seen a single robinhood launch try anything else. only gated one i've watched was $FWA on eth, couldn't buy it on the open market for fifteen days, only earned it by participating

completely different shape. making higher highs three days straight, topped around 35m earlier tonight and sitting at 29.4m now. that's 84% of its peak while the robinhood five are all between 23 and 45

theirs peak at hour zero and never see it again. this one's peak is today

different chain so not a clean comparison. but nobody's run that experiment on robinhood yet and it's the obvious thing nobody's trying

my read on why people keep piling in is speed, not conviction. you can price a plain memecoin in three seconds. infra project makes you read docs and form a view, and by the time you've done that the entry's gone. the thing that needs the least thinking fills first

which is also why the window keeps shrinking. everyone clocked the pattern so everyone's front running the same forty minutes now

and your feed only loads winners. plenty launched these three weeks that never cleared 50k, nobody screenshots those. these five are just the ones that got big enough for me to notice, which is literally the bias i'm describing

what actually changed this cycle is onboarding. no wallet, no bridge, no learning a dex. that's the structural bit, not sentiment

real money moving here fr. but the shape repeats every time and it's accelerating. not a reason to sit out, just worth knowing which part of the curve you're standing on

kairosfi's tweet photo. pulled five robinhood chain charts tonight and lined them up chronologically. same shape every time, way cleaner than i expected

$CASHCAT july 8th, about four days to top near 225m. $TENDIES on the 16th, two three days to 34m. $GME the 23rd, 22m in roughly eight hours. $GTR the 24th, 5m in ninety minutes. $TA last night, topped at 2.4m in forty

4 days to 40 minutes in 3 weeks. time to peak is just collapsing

none of them went back to the high after. not one. cashcat's had eighteen days to try and it's at 52m rn. every chart is a vertical open then oscillation underneath forever

they land in the same band too, roughly a third to 45% of peak. cashcat sits lower at 23% but that run was also the most violent of the five, close to 100x off the base. steeper the candle, deeper the retrace

what all five share : open distribution from minute one. no lock, no vesting, nothing. anyone early could dump straight into the first wave of buyers

worth saying, i haven't seen a single robinhood launch try anything else. only gated one i've watched was $FWA on eth, couldn't buy it on the open market for fifteen days, only earned it by participating

completely different shape. making higher highs three days straight, topped around 35m earlier tonight and sitting at 29.4m now. that's 84% of its peak while the robinhood five are all between 23 and 45

theirs peak at hour zero and never see it again. this one's peak is today

different chain so not a clean comparison. but nobody's run that experiment on robinhood yet and it's the obvious thing nobody's trying

my read on why people keep piling in is speed, not conviction. you can price a plain memecoin in three seconds. infra project makes you read docs and form a view, and by the time you've done that the entry's gone. the thing that needs the least thinking fills first

which is also why the window keeps shrinking. everyone clocked the pattern so everyone's front running the same forty minutes now

and your feed only loads winners. plenty launched these three weeks that never cleared 50k, nobody screenshots those. these five are just the ones that got big enough for me to notice, which is literally the bias i'm describing

what actually changed this cycle is onboarding. no wallet, no bridge, no learning a dex. that's the structural bit, not sentiment

real money moving here fr. but the shape repeats every time and it's accelerating. not a reason to sit out, just worth knowing which part of the curve you're standing on

kairosfi's tweet photo. pulled five robinhood chain charts tonight and lined them up chronologically. same shape every time, way cleaner than i expected

$CASHCAT july 8th, about four days to top near 225m. $TENDIES on the 16th, two three days to 34m. $GME the 23rd, 22m in roughly eight hours. $GTR the 24th, 5m in ninety minutes. $TA last night, topped at 2.4m in forty

4 days to 40 minutes in 3 weeks. time to peak is just collapsing

none of them went back to the high after. not one. cashcat's had eighteen days to try and it's at 52m rn. every chart is a vertical open then oscillation underneath forever

they land in the same band too, roughly a third to 45% of peak. cashcat sits lower at 23% but that run was also the most violent of the five, close to 100x off the base. steeper the candle, deeper the retrace

what all five share : open distribution from minute one. no lock, no vesting, nothing. anyone early could dump straight into the first wave of buyers

worth saying, i haven't seen a single robinhood launch try anything else. only gated one i've watched was $FWA on eth, couldn't buy it on the open market for fifteen days, only earned it by participating

completely different shape. making higher highs three days straight, topped around 35m earlier tonight and sitting at 29.4m now. that's 84% of its peak while the robinhood five are all between 23 and 45

theirs peak at hour zero and never see it again. this one's peak is today

different chain so not a clean comparison. but nobody's run that experiment on robinhood yet and it's the obvious thing nobody's trying

my read on why people keep piling in is speed, not conviction. you can price a plain memecoin in three seconds. infra project makes you read docs and form a view, and by the time you've done that the entry's gone. the thing that needs the least thinking fills first

which is also why the window keeps shrinking. everyone clocked the pattern so everyone's front running the same forty minutes now

and your feed only loads winners. plenty launched these three weeks that never cleared 50k, nobody screenshots those. these five are just the ones that got big enough for me to notice, which is literally the bias i'm describing

what actually changed this cycle is onboarding. no wallet, no bridge, no learning a dex. that's the structural bit, not sentiment

real money moving here fr. but the shape repeats every time and it's accelerating. not a reason to sit out, just worth knowing which part of the curve you're standing on

kairosfi's tweet photo. pulled five robinhood chain charts tonight and lined them up chronologically. same shape every time, way cleaner than i expected

$CASHCAT july 8th, about four days to top near 225m. $TENDIES on the 16th, two three days to 34m. $GME the 23rd, 22m in roughly eight hours. $GTR the 24th, 5m in ninety minutes. $TA last night, topped at 2.4m in forty

4 days to 40 minutes in 3 weeks. time to peak is just collapsing

none of them went back to the high after. not one. cashcat's had eighteen days to try and it's at 52m rn. every chart is a vertical open then oscillation underneath forever

they land in the same band too, roughly a third to 45% of peak. cashcat sits lower at 23% but that run was also the most violent of the five, close to 100x off the base. steeper the candle, deeper the retrace

what all five share : open distribution from minute one. no lock, no vesting, nothing. anyone early could dump straight into the first wave of buyers

worth saying, i haven't seen a single robinhood launch try anything else. only gated one i've watched was $FWA on eth, couldn't buy it on the open market for fifteen days, only earned it by participating

completely different shape. making higher highs three days straight, topped around 35m earlier tonight and sitting at 29.4m now. that's 84% of its peak while the robinhood five are all between 23 and 45

theirs peak at hour zero and never see it again. this one's peak is today

different chain so not a clean comparison. but nobody's run that experiment on robinhood yet and it's the obvious thing nobody's trying

my read on why people keep piling in is speed, not conviction. you can price a plain memecoin in three seconds. infra project makes you read docs and form a view, and by the time you've done that the entry's gone. the thing that needs the least thinking fills first

which is also why the window keeps shrinking. everyone clocked the pattern so everyone's front running the same forty minutes now

and your feed only loads winners. plenty launched these three weeks that never cleared 50k, nobody screenshots those. these five are just the ones that got big enough for me to notice, which is literally the bias i'm describing

what actually changed this cycle is onboarding. no wallet, no bridge, no learning a dex. that's the structural bit, not sentiment

real money moving here fr. but the shape repeats every time and it's accelerating. not a reason to sit out, just worth knowing which part of the curve you're standing on

3

5

1

2

739

4 days ago

meme stocks is close but the structure's stranger than that MARS isn't a tokenized equity, it's a memecoin whose quote asset is one. it pairs against SPCXB on flap and the tax routes that token back to holders the meme accrues stock exposure, not the other way round. first time i've seen that pairing run live at size

0

0

0

0

191

4 days ago

what stands out isn't the 1000%, it's that the chart sat flat for two days after your entry and then did 4m to 37m in six hours thesis was right early, price only agreed once alpha + the cz line landed. different skill from timing a pump underrated part is what holding it pays btw. MARS pairs against SPCXB on flap and the tax routes that quote token straight out to holders, so you accrue an uncorrelated asset instead of more MARS holding this fwiw

0

0

0

0

382

4 days ago

$MARSCOIN holding this and i sized, so weigh everything below accordingly the cz line everyone's trading is ambiguous af and the market priced one side of it what he wrote "i support all meme coins. i might even buy (or sell) one or two in the next few weeks to test a few new things" it came out of a thread defending giggleacademy for selling donated memecoins. the paragraph right above says don't complain about the selling pressure later. the parenthesis isn't decoration counter i've seen and tbh it's fair : the line was unnecessary, he added it anyway, and it landed right after alpha listed a memecoin for the first time in ages both readings are alive, nobody can settle it, and the chart trades like only one exists the 2021 lore holds up better than i expected tho. cz replies to elon w/ "maybe call it marscoin ?", then closes the thread w/ "make sure it's a utility token so that we can list it." five years later alpha lists it. that loop actually closed, which almost never happens w/ callback trades what nobody's analysing rn is the vault MARS trades against SPCXB, the bstocks tokenized spacex quote token on flap. 3/3 tax fills a vault that pays SPCXB straight out to holders. site shows 5,688 SPCXB distributed all time, 651k at current value, payouts landing every few minutes the yield is funded by turnover tho. not external revenue, just a transfer from active traders to passive holders scaled to volume. volume drops 90%, distribution drops 90%. worth saying plainly before anyone calls it cash flow detail worth catching : 2,468 reward holders out of 10.7k total. so roughly a quarter of the book is actually receiving. and 3,754 all time earners vs 2,468 now, meaning 1,300 stopped qualifying somewhere along the way. the "hold and receive" framing is doing some work there why it's still the interesting part imo : classic reflection tokens pay you in themselves, which is circular, you just accumulate the thing that's bleeding. this pays in an asset uncorrelated to MARS. holder ends up w/ spacex exposure that survives even if MARS doesn't. genuinely different design and idk why nobody's framing it that way one clean positive nobody mentions : fdv and mc both sit at 37.3m. full float, nothing locked, no unlock overhang waiting to eat future bids what i can't verify, and it outweighs everything above : whether SPCXB is actually share backed. spacex is private, tokenized pre ipo products are often spv or synthetic wrappers. the whole vault thesis rests on what sits behind that quote token and i haven't found the structure documented anywhere yet numbers i'd want people to actually look at : 734k liquidity against 37.3m mc, so about 2%. narrow exit for a cap this size. and 24h vol splits 7.3m buys vs 7.0m sells, basically 1:1 on a +887% day, so there's real distribution happening into the move not just accumulation 10.7k holders, 5.7k traders in 24h. peaked near 43m earlier, 37.3m rn tracking the distribution rate and whether spcxb backing gets published. if it does this stops being a lore trade

kairosfi's tweet photo. $MARSCOIN

holding this and i sized, so weigh everything below accordingly

the cz line everyone's trading is ambiguous af and the market priced one side of it

what he wrote "i support all meme coins. i might even buy (or sell) one or two in the next few weeks to test a few new things"

it came out of a thread defending giggleacademy for selling donated memecoins. the paragraph right above says don't complain about the selling pressure later. the parenthesis isn't decoration

counter i've seen and tbh it's fair : the line was unnecessary, he added it anyway, and it landed right after alpha listed a memecoin for the first time in ages

both readings are alive, nobody can settle it, and the chart trades like only one exists

the 2021 lore holds up better than i expected tho. cz replies to elon w/ "maybe call it marscoin ?", then closes the thread w/ "make sure it's a utility token so that we can list it." five years later alpha lists it. that loop actually closed, which almost never happens w/ callback trades

what nobody's analysing rn is the vault

MARS trades against SPCXB, the bstocks tokenized spacex quote token on flap. 3/3 tax fills a vault that pays SPCXB straight out to holders. site shows 5,688 SPCXB distributed all time, 651k at current value, payouts landing every few minutes

the yield is funded by turnover tho. not external revenue, just a transfer from active traders to passive holders scaled to volume. volume drops 90%, distribution drops 90%. worth saying plainly before anyone calls it cash flow

detail worth catching : 2,468 reward holders out of 10.7k total. so roughly a quarter of the book is actually receiving. and 3,754 all time earners vs 2,468 now, meaning 1,300 stopped qualifying somewhere along the way. the "hold and receive" framing is doing some work there

why it's still the interesting part imo : classic reflection tokens pay you in themselves, which is circular, you just accumulate the thing that's bleeding. this pays in an asset uncorrelated to MARS. holder ends up w/ spacex exposure that survives even if MARS doesn't. genuinely different design and idk why nobody's framing it that way

one clean positive nobody mentions : fdv and mc both sit at 37.3m. full float, nothing locked, no unlock overhang waiting to eat future bids

what i can't verify, and it outweighs everything above : whether SPCXB is actually share backed. spacex is private, tokenized pre ipo products are often spv or synthetic wrappers. the whole vault thesis rests on what sits behind that quote token and i haven't found the structure documented anywhere yet

numbers i'd want people to actually look at : 734k liquidity against 37.3m mc, so about 2%. narrow exit for a cap this size. and 24h vol splits 7.3m buys vs 7.0m sells, basically 1:1 on a +887% day, so there's real distribution happening into the move not just accumulation

10.7k holders, 5.7k traders in 24h. peaked near 43m earlier, 37.3m rn

tracking the distribution rate and whether spcxb backing gets published. if it does this stops being a lore trade

kairosfi's tweet photo. $MARSCOIN

holding this and i sized, so weigh everything below accordingly

the cz line everyone's trading is ambiguous af and the market priced one side of it

what he wrote "i support all meme coins. i might even buy (or sell) one or two in the next few weeks to test a few new things"

it came out of a thread defending giggleacademy for selling donated memecoins. the paragraph right above says don't complain about the selling pressure later. the parenthesis isn't decoration

counter i've seen and tbh it's fair : the line was unnecessary, he added it anyway, and it landed right after alpha listed a memecoin for the first time in ages

both readings are alive, nobody can settle it, and the chart trades like only one exists

the 2021 lore holds up better than i expected tho. cz replies to elon w/ "maybe call it marscoin ?", then closes the thread w/ "make sure it's a utility token so that we can list it." five years later alpha lists it. that loop actually closed, which almost never happens w/ callback trades

what nobody's analysing rn is the vault

MARS trades against SPCXB, the bstocks tokenized spacex quote token on flap. 3/3 tax fills a vault that pays SPCXB straight out to holders. site shows 5,688 SPCXB distributed all time, 651k at current value, payouts landing every few minutes

the yield is funded by turnover tho. not external revenue, just a transfer from active traders to passive holders scaled to volume. volume drops 90%, distribution drops 90%. worth saying plainly before anyone calls it cash flow

detail worth catching : 2,468 reward holders out of 10.7k total. so roughly a quarter of the book is actually receiving. and 3,754 all time earners vs 2,468 now, meaning 1,300 stopped qualifying somewhere along the way. the "hold and receive" framing is doing some work there

why it's still the interesting part imo : classic reflection tokens pay you in themselves, which is circular, you just accumulate the thing that's bleeding. this pays in an asset uncorrelated to MARS. holder ends up w/ spacex exposure that survives even if MARS doesn't. genuinely different design and idk why nobody's framing it that way

one clean positive nobody mentions : fdv and mc both sit at 37.3m. full float, nothing locked, no unlock overhang waiting to eat future bids

what i can't verify, and it outweighs everything above : whether SPCXB is actually share backed. spacex is private, tokenized pre ipo products are often spv or synthetic wrappers. the whole vault thesis rests on what sits behind that quote token and i haven't found the structure documented anywhere yet

numbers i'd want people to actually look at : 734k liquidity against 37.3m mc, so about 2%. narrow exit for a cap this size. and 24h vol splits 7.3m buys vs 7.0m sells, basically 1:1 on a +887% day, so there's real distribution happening into the move not just accumulation

10.7k holders, 5.7k traders in 24h. peaked near 43m earlier, 37.3m rn

tracking the distribution rate and whether spcxb backing gets published. if it does this stops being a lore trade

kairosfi's tweet photo. $MARSCOIN

holding this and i sized, so weigh everything below accordingly

the cz line everyone's trading is ambiguous af and the market priced one side of it

what he wrote "i support all meme coins. i might even buy (or sell) one or two in the next few weeks to test a few new things"

it came out of a thread defending giggleacademy for selling donated memecoins. the paragraph right above says don't complain about the selling pressure later. the parenthesis isn't decoration

counter i've seen and tbh it's fair : the line was unnecessary, he added it anyway, and it landed right after alpha listed a memecoin for the first time in ages

both readings are alive, nobody can settle it, and the chart trades like only one exists

the 2021 lore holds up better than i expected tho. cz replies to elon w/ "maybe call it marscoin ?", then closes the thread w/ "make sure it's a utility token so that we can list it." five years later alpha lists it. that loop actually closed, which almost never happens w/ callback trades

what nobody's analysing rn is the vault

MARS trades against SPCXB, the bstocks tokenized spacex quote token on flap. 3/3 tax fills a vault that pays SPCXB straight out to holders. site shows 5,688 SPCXB distributed all time, 651k at current value, payouts landing every few minutes

the yield is funded by turnover tho. not external revenue, just a transfer from active traders to passive holders scaled to volume. volume drops 90%, distribution drops 90%. worth saying plainly before anyone calls it cash flow

detail worth catching : 2,468 reward holders out of 10.7k total. so roughly a quarter of the book is actually receiving. and 3,754 all time earners vs 2,468 now, meaning 1,300 stopped qualifying somewhere along the way. the "hold and receive" framing is doing some work there

why it's still the interesting part imo : classic reflection tokens pay you in themselves, which is circular, you just accumulate the thing that's bleeding. this pays in an asset uncorrelated to MARS. holder ends up w/ spacex exposure that survives even if MARS doesn't. genuinely different design and idk why nobody's framing it that way

one clean positive nobody mentions : fdv and mc both sit at 37.3m. full float, nothing locked, no unlock overhang waiting to eat future bids

what i can't verify, and it outweighs everything above : whether SPCXB is actually share backed. spacex is private, tokenized pre ipo products are often spv or synthetic wrappers. the whole vault thesis rests on what sits behind that quote token and i haven't found the structure documented anywhere yet

numbers i'd want people to actually look at : 734k liquidity against 37.3m mc, so about 2%. narrow exit for a cap this size. and 24h vol splits 7.3m buys vs 7.0m sells, basically 1:1 on a +887% day, so there's real distribution happening into the move not just accumulation

10.7k holders, 5.7k traders in 24h. peaked near 43m earlier, 37.3m rn

tracking the distribution rate and whether spcxb backing gets published. if it does this stops being a lore trade

kairosfi's tweet photo. $MARSCOIN

holding this and i sized, so weigh everything below accordingly

the cz line everyone's trading is ambiguous af and the market priced one side of it

what he wrote "i support all meme coins. i might even buy (or sell) one or two in the next few weeks to test a few new things"

it came out of a thread defending giggleacademy for selling donated memecoins. the paragraph right above says don't complain about the selling pressure later. the parenthesis isn't decoration

counter i've seen and tbh it's fair : the line was unnecessary, he added it anyway, and it landed right after alpha listed a memecoin for the first time in ages

both readings are alive, nobody can settle it, and the chart trades like only one exists

the 2021 lore holds up better than i expected tho. cz replies to elon w/ "maybe call it marscoin ?", then closes the thread w/ "make sure it's a utility token so that we can list it." five years later alpha lists it. that loop actually closed, which almost never happens w/ callback trades

what nobody's analysing rn is the vault

MARS trades against SPCXB, the bstocks tokenized spacex quote token on flap. 3/3 tax fills a vault that pays SPCXB straight out to holders. site shows 5,688 SPCXB distributed all time, 651k at current value, payouts landing every few minutes

the yield is funded by turnover tho. not external revenue, just a transfer from active traders to passive holders scaled to volume. volume drops 90%, distribution drops 90%. worth saying plainly before anyone calls it cash flow

detail worth catching : 2,468 reward holders out of 10.7k total. so roughly a quarter of the book is actually receiving. and 3,754 all time earners vs 2,468 now, meaning 1,300 stopped qualifying somewhere along the way. the "hold and receive" framing is doing some work there

why it's still the interesting part imo : classic reflection tokens pay you in themselves, which is circular, you just accumulate the thing that's bleeding. this pays in an asset uncorrelated to MARS. holder ends up w/ spacex exposure that survives even if MARS doesn't. genuinely different design and idk why nobody's framing it that way

one clean positive nobody mentions : fdv and mc both sit at 37.3m. full float, nothing locked, no unlock overhang waiting to eat future bids

what i can't verify, and it outweighs everything above : whether SPCXB is actually share backed. spacex is private, tokenized pre ipo products are often spv or synthetic wrappers. the whole vault thesis rests on what sits behind that quote token and i haven't found the structure documented anywhere yet

numbers i'd want people to actually look at : 734k liquidity against 37.3m mc, so about 2%. narrow exit for a cap this size. and 24h vol splits 7.3m buys vs 7.0m sells, basically 1:1 on a +887% day, so there's real distribution happening into the move not just accumulation

10.7k holders, 5.7k traders in 24h. peaked near 43m earlier, 37.3m rn

tracking the distribution rate and whether spcxb backing gets published. if it does this stops being a lore trade

1

4

1

0

296

7 days ago

@the91348 the launchpad itself is solid, that part's in the contracts and you can read it. the token is the open question tbh, nothing in the docs defines what it captures so it rides on what the team does with revenue. that's the part i'm watching but I hope bro

0

1

0

0

46

8 days ago

$RUNNER spent an hour in the https://t.co/LfxltQHefI docs and the creator incentive is what stuck with me standard launch, a creator makes money one way : hold supply, sell it into buyers. their best outcome and yours are opposite by construction. every fair launch pledge is just a promise not to do the thing they're built to do runner pays creators from curve trade fees plus a cut of uniswap swap fees after graduation. no presale, no team bag, creator buys the same curve as everyone else. money comes from volume over time instead of from the exit. dev who dumps kills their own annuity the lp being locked and not burned is what makes that work. burning is the usual trust flex but it torches the fee stream forever. runner holds a full range v3 position with no withdrawal path that still earns 1% on every swap. permanent income instead of a one time listing underrated part is graduation. everyone watches for the dev rug but the more common extraction is at migration, bots pre-create the pool at a skewed price and farm the first block. runner does it all inside the same tx as the buy that crosses 10 eth, seeds at the curve's exact final price and forces any pre-created pool back to it before liquidity lands. no gap to front-run gap worth flagging tho : the docs spec the protocol, not $RUNNER itself. nothing defines what the ticker captures, the lock and burn posts come from their account not from enforced code. protocol quality and token accrual are separate questions rn holding some, so read accordingly most launchpads put their trust in a roadmap. this one spent it on bytecode. going to track the first graduations and see if the tokens behave any different

3

6

1

0

273

7 days ago

@bonker_wtf exactly. and locking instead of burning is what keeps that math alive, burn kills the fee stream so the creator's back to needing an exit. the lock is what turns it into an annuity

0

0

0

0

9

8 days ago

@Hyperium_RH the pre-swap liquidity check is a great addition ngl, most agents just send it and let you find out after gHYP

0

0

0

0

54

8 days ago

@RunnerExchange read the whole thing this morning and the creator fee model is what sold me. paying them from volume instead of supply means a dev who dumps kills their own annuity full read here : https://t.co/RPcTzkz53y

8 days ago

$RUNNER spent an hour in the https://t.co/LfxltQHefI docs and the creator incentive is what stuck with me standard launch, a creator makes money one way : hold supply, sell it into buyers. their best outcome and yours are opposite by construction. every fair launch pledge is just a promise not to do the thing they're built to do runner pays creators from curve trade fees plus a cut of uniswap swap fees after graduation. no presale, no team bag, creator buys the same curve as everyone else. money comes from volume over time instead of from the exit. dev who dumps kills their own annuity the lp being locked and not burned is what makes that work. burning is the usual trust flex but it torches the fee stream forever. runner holds a full range v3 position with no withdrawal path that still earns 1% on every swap. permanent income instead of a one time listing underrated part is graduation. everyone watches for the dev rug but the more common extraction is at migration, bots pre-create the pool at a skewed price and farm the first block. runner does it all inside the same tx as the buy that crosses 10 eth, seeds at the curve's exact final price and forces any pre-created pool back to it before liquidity lands. no gap to front-run gap worth flagging tho : the docs spec the protocol, not $RUNNER itself. nothing defines what the ticker captures, the lock and burn posts come from their account not from enforced code. protocol quality and token accrual are separate questions rn holding some, so read accordingly most launchpads put their trust in a roadmap. this one spent it on bytecode. going to track the first graduations and see if the tokens behave any different

3

6

1

0

273

0

0

0

0

13

8 days ago

@virtuals_io @BinanceWallet gHYP

0

1

0

0

133

8 days ago

@joflocrypto appreciate it man

0

1

0

0

90

9 days ago

pulled five robinhood chain charts tonight and lined them up chronologically. same shape every time, way cleaner than i expected $CASHCAT july 8th, about four days to top near 225m. $TENDIES on the 16th, two three days to 34m. $GME the 23rd, 22m in roughly eight hours. $GTR the 24th, 5m in ninety minutes. $TA last night, topped at 2.4m in forty 4 days to 40 minutes in 3 weeks. time to peak is just collapsing none of them went back to the high after. not one. cashcat's had eighteen days to try and it's at 52m rn. every chart is a vertical open then oscillation underneath forever they land in the same band too, roughly a third to 45% of peak. cashcat sits lower at 23% but that run was also the most violent of the five, close to 100x off the base. steeper the candle, deeper the retrace what all five share : open distribution from minute one. no lock, no vesting, nothing. anyone early could dump straight into the first wave of buyers worth saying, i haven't seen a single robinhood launch try anything else. only gated one i've watched was $FWA on eth, couldn't buy it on the open market for fifteen days, only earned it by participating completely different shape. making higher highs three days straight, topped around 35m earlier tonight and sitting at 29.4m now. that's 84% of its peak while the robinhood five are all between 23 and 45 theirs peak at hour zero and never see it again. this one's peak is today different chain so not a clean comparison. but nobody's run that experiment on robinhood yet and it's the obvious thing nobody's trying my read on why people keep piling in is speed, not conviction. you can price a plain memecoin in three seconds. infra project makes you read docs and form a view, and by the time you've done that the entry's gone. the thing that needs the least thinking fills first which is also why the window keeps shrinking. everyone clocked the pattern so everyone's front running the same forty minutes now and your feed only loads winners. plenty launched these three weeks that never cleared 50k, nobody screenshots those. these five are just the ones that got big enough for me to notice, which is literally the bias i'm describing what actually changed this cycle is onboarding. no wallet, no bridge, no learning a dex. that's the structural bit, not sentiment real money moving here fr. but the shape repeats every time and it's accelerating. not a reason to sit out, just worth knowing which part of the curve you're standing on

kairosfi's tweet photo. pulled five robinhood chain charts tonight and lined them up chronologically. same shape every time, way cleaner than i expected

$CASHCAT july 8th, about four days to top near 225m. $TENDIES on the 16th, two three days to 34m. $GME the 23rd, 22m in roughly eight hours. $GTR the 24th, 5m in ninety minutes. $TA last night, topped at 2.4m in forty

4 days to 40 minutes in 3 weeks. time to peak is just collapsing

none of them went back to the high after. not one. cashcat's had eighteen days to try and it's at 52m rn. every chart is a vertical open then oscillation underneath forever

they land in the same band too, roughly a third to 45% of peak. cashcat sits lower at 23% but that run was also the most violent of the five, close to 100x off the base. steeper the candle, deeper the retrace

what all five share : open distribution from minute one. no lock, no vesting, nothing. anyone early could dump straight into the first wave of buyers

worth saying, i haven't seen a single robinhood launch try anything else. only gated one i've watched was $FWA on eth, couldn't buy it on the open market for fifteen days, only earned it by participating

completely different shape. making higher highs three days straight, topped around 35m earlier tonight and sitting at 29.4m now. that's 84% of its peak while the robinhood five are all between 23 and 45

theirs peak at hour zero and never see it again. this one's peak is today

different chain so not a clean comparison. but nobody's run that experiment on robinhood yet and it's the obvious thing nobody's trying

my read on why people keep piling in is speed, not conviction. you can price a plain memecoin in three seconds. infra project makes you read docs and form a view, and by the time you've done that the entry's gone. the thing that needs the least thinking fills first

which is also why the window keeps shrinking. everyone clocked the pattern so everyone's front running the same forty minutes now

and your feed only loads winners. plenty launched these three weeks that never cleared 50k, nobody screenshots those. these five are just the ones that got big enough for me to notice, which is literally the bias i'm describing

what actually changed this cycle is onboarding. no wallet, no bridge, no learning a dex. that's the structural bit, not sentiment

real money moving here fr. but the shape repeats every time and it's accelerating. not a reason to sit out, just worth knowing which part of the curve you're standing on

kairosfi's tweet photo. pulled five robinhood chain charts tonight and lined them up chronologically. same shape every time, way cleaner than i expected

$CASHCAT july 8th, about four days to top near 225m. $TENDIES on the 16th, two three days to 34m. $GME the 23rd, 22m in roughly eight hours. $GTR the 24th, 5m in ninety minutes. $TA last night, topped at 2.4m in forty

4 days to 40 minutes in 3 weeks. time to peak is just collapsing

none of them went back to the high after. not one. cashcat's had eighteen days to try and it's at 52m rn. every chart is a vertical open then oscillation underneath forever

they land in the same band too, roughly a third to 45% of peak. cashcat sits lower at 23% but that run was also the most violent of the five, close to 100x off the base. steeper the candle, deeper the retrace

what all five share : open distribution from minute one. no lock, no vesting, nothing. anyone early could dump straight into the first wave of buyers

worth saying, i haven't seen a single robinhood launch try anything else. only gated one i've watched was $FWA on eth, couldn't buy it on the open market for fifteen days, only earned it by participating

completely different shape. making higher highs three days straight, topped around 35m earlier tonight and sitting at 29.4m now. that's 84% of its peak while the robinhood five are all between 23 and 45

theirs peak at hour zero and never see it again. this one's peak is today

different chain so not a clean comparison. but nobody's run that experiment on robinhood yet and it's the obvious thing nobody's trying

my read on why people keep piling in is speed, not conviction. you can price a plain memecoin in three seconds. infra project makes you read docs and form a view, and by the time you've done that the entry's gone. the thing that needs the least thinking fills first

which is also why the window keeps shrinking. everyone clocked the pattern so everyone's front running the same forty minutes now

and your feed only loads winners. plenty launched these three weeks that never cleared 50k, nobody screenshots those. these five are just the ones that got big enough for me to notice, which is literally the bias i'm describing

what actually changed this cycle is onboarding. no wallet, no bridge, no learning a dex. that's the structural bit, not sentiment

real money moving here fr. but the shape repeats every time and it's accelerating. not a reason to sit out, just worth knowing which part of the curve you're standing on

kairosfi's tweet photo. pulled five robinhood chain charts tonight and lined them up chronologically. same shape every time, way cleaner than i expected

$CASHCAT july 8th, about four days to top near 225m. $TENDIES on the 16th, two three days to 34m. $GME the 23rd, 22m in roughly eight hours. $GTR the 24th, 5m in ninety minutes. $TA last night, topped at 2.4m in forty

4 days to 40 minutes in 3 weeks. time to peak is just collapsing

none of them went back to the high after. not one. cashcat's had eighteen days to try and it's at 52m rn. every chart is a vertical open then oscillation underneath forever

they land in the same band too, roughly a third to 45% of peak. cashcat sits lower at 23% but that run was also the most violent of the five, close to 100x off the base. steeper the candle, deeper the retrace

what all five share : open distribution from minute one. no lock, no vesting, nothing. anyone early could dump straight into the first wave of buyers

worth saying, i haven't seen a single robinhood launch try anything else. only gated one i've watched was $FWA on eth, couldn't buy it on the open market for fifteen days, only earned it by participating

completely different shape. making higher highs three days straight, topped around 35m earlier tonight and sitting at 29.4m now. that's 84% of its peak while the robinhood five are all between 23 and 45

theirs peak at hour zero and never see it again. this one's peak is today

different chain so not a clean comparison. but nobody's run that experiment on robinhood yet and it's the obvious thing nobody's trying

my read on why people keep piling in is speed, not conviction. you can price a plain memecoin in three seconds. infra project makes you read docs and form a view, and by the time you've done that the entry's gone. the thing that needs the least thinking fills first

which is also why the window keeps shrinking. everyone clocked the pattern so everyone's front running the same forty minutes now

and your feed only loads winners. plenty launched these three weeks that never cleared 50k, nobody screenshots those. these five are just the ones that got big enough for me to notice, which is literally the bias i'm describing

what actually changed this cycle is onboarding. no wallet, no bridge, no learning a dex. that's the structural bit, not sentiment

real money moving here fr. but the shape repeats every time and it's accelerating. not a reason to sit out, just worth knowing which part of the curve you're standing on

kairosfi's tweet photo. pulled five robinhood chain charts tonight and lined them up chronologically. same shape every time, way cleaner than i expected

$CASHCAT july 8th, about four days to top near 225m. $TENDIES on the 16th, two three days to 34m. $GME the 23rd, 22m in roughly eight hours. $GTR the 24th, 5m in ninety minutes. $TA last night, topped at 2.4m in forty

4 days to 40 minutes in 3 weeks. time to peak is just collapsing

none of them went back to the high after. not one. cashcat's had eighteen days to try and it's at 52m rn. every chart is a vertical open then oscillation underneath forever

they land in the same band too, roughly a third to 45% of peak. cashcat sits lower at 23% but that run was also the most violent of the five, close to 100x off the base. steeper the candle, deeper the retrace

what all five share : open distribution from minute one. no lock, no vesting, nothing. anyone early could dump straight into the first wave of buyers

worth saying, i haven't seen a single robinhood launch try anything else. only gated one i've watched was $FWA on eth, couldn't buy it on the open market for fifteen days, only earned it by participating

completely different shape. making higher highs three days straight, topped around 35m earlier tonight and sitting at 29.4m now. that's 84% of its peak while the robinhood five are all between 23 and 45

theirs peak at hour zero and never see it again. this one's peak is today

different chain so not a clean comparison. but nobody's run that experiment on robinhood yet and it's the obvious thing nobody's trying

my read on why people keep piling in is speed, not conviction. you can price a plain memecoin in three seconds. infra project makes you read docs and form a view, and by the time you've done that the entry's gone. the thing that needs the least thinking fills first

which is also why the window keeps shrinking. everyone clocked the pattern so everyone's front running the same forty minutes now

and your feed only loads winners. plenty launched these three weeks that never cleared 50k, nobody screenshots those. these five are just the ones that got big enough for me to notice, which is literally the bias i'm describing

what actually changed this cycle is onboarding. no wallet, no bridge, no learning a dex. that's the structural bit, not sentiment

real money moving here fr. but the shape repeats every time and it's accelerating. not a reason to sit out, just worth knowing which part of the curve you're standing on

3

5

1

2

739

8 days ago

@mockingojay ty. the bit i keep coming back to is nobody's tried a gated launch on rh yet, feels like the obvious test

0

0

0

0

62

9 days ago

0

0

0

0

38

9 days ago

the two i left out, same shape. $TENDIES july 16th topped at 34m, $GTR the 24th hit 5m in ninety minutes

kairosfi's tweet photo. the two i left out, same shape. $TENDIES july 16th topped at 34m, $GTR the 24th hit 5m in ninety minutes https://t.co/dGbXmYWniQ

0

1

0

0

125

9 days ago

@Hyperium_RH @Ondo @SushiSwap @coingecko @dexscreener been holding $HYP since early and this is exactly the direction i wanted to see. agent that actually executes instead of just talking about markets, and they keep shipping every week gHYP

0

0

0

0

27

10 days ago

@Tuteth_ this is the exact mechanism i flagged two days ago, the reward loop for holding the top spot is what's driving people to keep depositing real value instead of dumping $FWA

0

1

0

0

9

10 days ago

called this on $FWA at 9m mc two days ago, sitting above 30m now. the sell pressure zone i flagged during the distribution window didn't break the mechanism either, still holding up

kairosfi's tweet photo. called this on $FWA at 9m mc two days ago, sitting above 30m now. the sell pressure zone i flagged during the distribution window didn't break the mechanism either, still holding up https://t.co/5ZdQSoX7zx

12 days ago

been watching $FWA's rollout, mechanism's actually pretty clever people deposit or buy blue chip nfts (punks, beeple, veefriends) into a shared pool backed by real eth (~97 eth right now). you pay a dynamic price, get a random nft pulled out. onchain loot box for real blue chips smart part : whoever deposits the highest value nft earns 5% of every purchase while holding that spot. punk #7853 pulled 15.5 eth in a day just from that. keeps people depositing real value instead of garbage can't buy $FWA on the open market for 2 weeks either, only earned through participating. up to 30% of supply gets distributed before external trading even opens worth flagging : that's a lot of tokens hitting wallets right as external buys turn on, usually where sell pressure shows up first. also all these numbers are self reported, haven't verified onchain myself yet still one of the more interesting fair launch mechanics i've seen this year. eth mainnet, not robinhood chain, different thesis entirely. watching how it holds once day 15 hits

1

8

0

2

2K

0

5

0

0

184

10 days ago

@GameStopOnChain GME's origin story goes deeper than nostalgia now, real arb mechanism tying the token to the stock these days full breakdown here : https://t.co/yEYbOcGRE2

11 days ago

$GME launched on robinhood chain and everyone's reading it as a standard memestock reboot, it's not robinhood's stock tokens aren't synthetic exposure like synthetix's old sTSLA/sAAPL synths from 2021, those got discontinued a few months in over low volume and reg concerns, never had real backing behind them. GME here is different, 1:1 backed debt securities, real shares in custody, price feeds published onchain per asset via chainlink. that backing's the actual reason this mechanism can work at all bankr shipped stock paired pools on robinhood chain a few days ago, letting anyone launch a token quoted against a stock token instead of eth/usdc. 0xdeployer used that to pair a new memecoin against tokenized $GME. volume on the memecoin pushes the pool price away from the oracle anchored price, that's the arb gap robinhub flagged closing that gap isn't a permissionless mint/burn like a stablecoin though. redemption goes through authorized participants under kyc, retail mint isn't instant either. prob why the gap opened this wide instead of snapping shut in seconds like defi pegs usually do numbers so far, per deployer : memecoin did close to $15m volume overnight, the gme token itself did $30m, near 11k holders since launch. the part most people are sleeping on : market makers keep quoting overnight instead of freezing at last close, so all that overnight memecoin volume is actually moving the tradeable price of gme exposure while nyse is shut. real price discovery outside market hours on the short squeeze talk going around ct : these are debt claims not equity, no shareholder rights, redemption for actual shares isn't live yet, only cash redemption is. token demand does need matching custodied shares so there's some real pull, but volume ≠ net new mints and idk the actual mint/burn split yet also, @GameStopOnChain pushing this doesn't appear to be gamestop corp itself, reads like a meme brand riding the ticker, worth not conflating the two until confirmed either way still early, still an experiment, but first memecoin this cycle where the mechanism actually explains the price instead of just narrative

2

15

0

1

799

0

0

0

0

9

10 days ago

@Mandate_AI fair point, the custody backing is what unlocks that composability long run. still early for lending markets against these specific tokens tho, redemption's still cash only and AP gated so the actual DeFi legos built on top are gonna lag the narrative a bit

0

0

0

0

7

11 days ago

$GME launched on robinhood chain and everyone's reading it as a standard memestock reboot, it's not robinhood's stock tokens aren't synthetic exposure like synthetix's old sTSLA/sAAPL synths from 2021, those got discontinued a few months in over low volume and reg concerns, never had real backing behind them. GME here is different, 1:1 backed debt securities, real shares in custody, price feeds published onchain per asset via chainlink. that backing's the actual reason this mechanism can work at all bankr shipped stock paired pools on robinhood chain a few days ago, letting anyone launch a token quoted against a stock token instead of eth/usdc. 0xdeployer used that to pair a new memecoin against tokenized $GME. volume on the memecoin pushes the pool price away from the oracle anchored price, that's the arb gap robinhub flagged closing that gap isn't a permissionless mint/burn like a stablecoin though. redemption goes through authorized participants under kyc, retail mint isn't instant either. prob why the gap opened this wide instead of snapping shut in seconds like defi pegs usually do numbers so far, per deployer : memecoin did close to $15m volume overnight, the gme token itself did $30m, near 11k holders since launch. the part most people are sleeping on : market makers keep quoting overnight instead of freezing at last close, so all that overnight memecoin volume is actually moving the tradeable price of gme exposure while nyse is shut. real price discovery outside market hours on the short squeeze talk going around ct : these are debt claims not equity, no shareholder rights, redemption for actual shares isn't live yet, only cash redemption is. token demand does need matching custodied shares so there's some real pull, but volume ≠ net new mints and idk the actual mint/burn split yet also, @GameStopOnChain pushing this doesn't appear to be gamestop corp itself, reads like a meme brand riding the ticker, worth not conflating the two until confirmed either way still early, still an experiment, but first memecoin this cycle where the mechanism actually explains the price instead of just narrative

2

15

0

1

799

11 days ago

@spyzer been on $OTTO for a bit, RH agents integration is the real unlock not just narrative. chart's looking like a good spot rn ngl

0

1

0

0

54

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users