Germany - White Supremacists Murdered 3 Indians by setting the Apartment on Fire
America - White Nazi Terrorist tried Mass shooting at a Hindu Temple to kill as many Indians as possible
White Terrorism incidents is Increasing all over world
Indians Need to Keep Guns Ready
Meet Himanshu Jangra and Sejal Pawar :
Himanshu Jangra :
> Went on Pranit More's show
> Made the "370 biryani vasool" remark
> After that
> Got trolled everywhere
> Got abused online
> Apologised publicly
> Got fired from his job
Sejal Pawar :
> She is a doctor
> Went on the same show
> Made jokes about dead bodies
> Said she and her friends
> Make fun of male dead bodies
> Make fun of D size of dead bodies
> After that
> Gained more than 2 lakh followers
> Wasn't fired from her job
> Didn't face outrage on the same level as Himanshu
> Many self-proclaimed feminists are defending her
The question is If Himanshu deserved criticism for what he said, that's a separate discussion. But why is Sejal Pawar not receiving the same level of backlash? Why is she gaining followers and support instead of facing similar consequences?
Shouldn't standards be applied equally, regardless of whether the person is a man or a woman?
500+ days in jail.
Bail denied. Again.
Chinmoy Krishna Das Prabhu, a spiritual leader and an ISKCON monk, continues to languish behind bars in Bangladesh while the world watches.
When even his lawyers are intimidated, threatened and silenced in court corridors, what justice are we even talking about?
Is advocating for the rights of the Minority Hindu community a crime? When a saffron-clad soul is treated like a criminal for raising his voice, the world CANNOT remain silent.
I appeal to the Government of Bangladesh to give medical aid and, more importantly, access to fair justice to Chinmoy Krishna Das Prabhu immediately. May he be granted bail at the earliest.
And to all the pseudo-secularists and Selective Human rights Activists around the World who flood timelines overnight, wave watermelons and trend hashtags on cue, your silence can be still heard. Apparently, your humanity has a filter.
@bdhc_delhi@UNHumanRights@UN_HRC@UN
#FreeChinmoyKrishnaDas
A terrorist should face the death penalty even if the attack fails. Punishment in terrorism must be based on intent, not outcome, as such individuals are unlikely to reform.
This is Mohd Shariq. Today, an NIA court sentenced him to 10 years’ RI for the 2022 pressure cooker blast in Mangaluru. In Nov 2022, he tried to detonate a cooker bomb at a Mandir but accidentally triggered it inside the auto-rickshaw he was travelling in. He survived with 40% burns and was treated at taxpayers’ expense.
Why show leniency to someone whose clear intent was mass killing, but who failed only by accident?
This wasn’t his first offence. In 2021, Mangaluru police arrested him for pro-ISIS and anti-Hindu graffiti on a police station wall; he was granted bail.
After release, he trained two associates to make IEDs; they later carried out trial blasts in Shivamogga in Sept 2022 and were arrested, while he escaped. In 2024, individuals from his module, trained by him, were involved in the Rameshwaram Café blast.
A terrorist can't change. Such individuals should either remain in prison, preferably in long-term solitary confinement, or face capital punishment, not a 10-year sentence. Release him, and he won’t start fresh, he’ll pick up exactly where he left off, with the same intent, the same methods, but with far greater caution and planning.
Shark Tank Panel:
Peyush Bansal : Hijabs are permitted, but *bindis* and *kalavas* are not.
Namita Thapar: *Namaz* is good for one's health.
The very same Namita Thapar had, in Season 1, funded a startup aimed at spreading awareness regarding women's menstruation and the taboos associated with it within Hinduism.
In Shark Tank India Season 1 (Episode 6, aired around December 2021), founders Aditi Gupta and Tuhin Paul presented their pitch for Menstrupedia.
Namita Thapar was the only "Shark" who chose to invest. She offered ₹50 lakhs in exchange for a 20% equity stake. This made her a partner in the venture.
The content explicitly addresses cultural and religious taboos—including those prevalent within Hindu traditions—such as the restrictions on entering temples, offering prayers, or touching sacred objects during menstruation (depicting these as misconceptions that make women feel "impure" or "unclean"). These are "woke capitalists"... they possess the capacity to solve specific problems, yet they lack a broader vision for the nation and its civilization.
A Muslim woman named Sana, wearing a hijab, appeared on the *Shark Tank* program; she runs a Muslim fashion house known as 'Midest Fashion.'
Her collection featured various fashion garments for Muslim women, including burqas and abayas.
Upon stepping onto the stage, the very first thing she declared was, "I—and I alone—will decide what I choose to wear... blah, blah, blah." Consequently, all the *Shark Tank* judges, seemingly gripped by a sense of guilt, began applauding. Namita, in particular, was effusive in her praise, exclaiming, "I absolutely loved that punchline of yours—the assertion that deciding what you wish to wear is your prerogative, and that you are the one who gets to make that choice!"
Ultimately, all the 'Sharks'—including Peyush Bansal—provided funding to this young woman.
Now, however, imagine—just for a moment—if a Hindu woman were to appear on the show wearing a *ghoonghat* (a traditional face veil). In that scenario, these very same 'Sharks' would undoubtedly mock her, remarking, "The world has progressed so far, yet here you are—still clinging to the *ghoonghat* and the veil, symbols of backwardness!"
Regrettably, we Hindus appear to be increasingly falling victim to Stockholm Syndrome.
Requesting all the current and ex-employees of #hinduphobic companies where being Hindu and practicing your culture were prohibited by your superiors or anyone, please raise your voice.
This is now or never 🙏
#lenskart#TCSNashikCase