@Leaflit It's all fine and good as long as creators actually put out a finished product. It would be a totally different conversation for players who have to buy the game, if the game ends up having to be vibe coded on-and-on and remain forever unfinished.
@GiveMeBanHammer Calm down. It's in their ability to decide what to put into the service they're giving. That's why it's an option. If their company wants to go full-AI on the search engine, that's their choice and the market will decide.
Kids shouldn't even over-rely on these vs books.
@Tectone I'd say mass extermination of country traitors and terrorists go first. Throw them all to Iran or Palestine, I don't care which. I got family in the US and they sure as hell ain't safe with all the "non-action" happening.
@TexasCowgrl1111 Seems to me like they were betting on the next election, not realizing that after this election there won't be any going further.
The current administration has done nothing to remove blatant traitors and terrorists sitting in the government.
They are now reaping the results.
@NiiColaVT@Leaflit Oh, hey, your question about why Chinese models are weightless was answered in the latest The China Show episode 339. Around 43:43 timestamp going forward (whole segment so it's several minutes).
Context: The hosts prev lived in CH for years and have connections there for info.
@TheeHolyBall 2/2 And lastly,
They want the ability to punish Ember, and other people, via social consensus in the same level as a law would.
Given as you're insightful, I think you can understand the pros and cons of these all.
It's all so fake and gay, farming, and utter disappointment.
@TheeHolyBall Brother, I am tired. I tried asking folks what they really want and this was the "general" response I aggregated:
They want Ember in permanent exile from society.
They want everyone to have the same opinion on what happened, basically "Ember bad!"
1/2
@bhanna1110@Leaflit @TheY00per Last rep since I gotta go now:
2. I would point out that we're seeing exactly that there's people who think differently than you'd like. For us to enact your ideal, we would have to change their actions to opposite their free will.
3. Then reality has proven this is unlikely now
@Sam_Axiom@grok Each side of the diamond is a line of the same length.
At flat form, the lines are organized equally close so the hole is wide but short.
Folded that way, the lines are organized even closer in x axis, but also longer on y axis. Creates a narrower but longer hole fitting it.
@bhanna1110@Leaflit @TheY00per 2. You said you'd like for people to do something opposite of what they feel (even if to us they're wrong). That's controlling others' actions.
3. I get that honesty is a good thing. But how do we enforce the "consequence" and who dictates it? Especially here on the internet.
@NguruPewul I don't know if they're Christian, but I was able to at least get some concrete answer of what further result is wanted, from two folks who seem to be on the same POV of continuing going at Ember.
They want to ostracize, to punish, and to make others do as they are told.
@bhanna1110@Leaflit @TheY00per No, I understood what you were saying. But I wanted to hear more concrete actions you see.
Your concrete demands are:
1. Ostracize
2. Control others' actions when they think differently from you
3. Set a new social law/norm with a direct consequence for behavior you object to
@bhanna1110@Leaflit @TheY00per "Actually" as-in a concrete idea of what action to take.
I asked another person and they gave a good example below.
I ask because people like to yap, but nobody every says what they want to happen or want to be done. That's why things never move forward. People don't think.