“Follow the process” gets thrown around a lot in trading.
But for a long time, I didn’t actually have one.
I thought I did — I had a lot of market and technical knowledge, setups I liked,
and I took a lot of trades because of it.
Sometimes it worked. A lot of times it didn’t.
After working with elite traders, I eventually realized
a real process isn’t just about what to trade —
it’s about what not to trade.
It should remove the ability to justify bad decisions in the moment.
That was the missing piece for me.
So I started building a more structured way to understand
the patterns in my own decision-making.
Kazen.
It’s not another journal — more of a mirror for how you actually trade.
I’ll share more as I keep building and refining it.
@jtrader A lot of ‘lack of trust’ issues is really lack of evidence.
It can be hard to trust a process you haven’t executed or practiced consistently enough to verify
$INTC and $AMD helped push $QQQ higher again.
Some traders keep trying to call the top.
But that’s often just bias disguised as conviction.
If your system doesn’t have a proven edge fading extremes, the trend is usually the trade.
@EliteOptions2 The underrated part is that routine doesn’t build patience directly.
It does help build trust in your decision filters, and what looks like patience follows from that.
@samuraipips358 These thoughts usually show up when the exit criteria isn’t fully defined beforehand, so the mind tries to negotiate mid-trade.
Love the boss/employee analogy!
@corymitc Huge skill. I commentate price action out loud daily, but you're one of the first I remember talking about it.
Mental capital is real - decision quality def drops fast when you’re not in the right state.
@TradingComposur The difference is in trading you’re making decisions with money on the line.
If those decisions aren’t predefined, self-control alone won’t help you, and probably won't last over time
Sat out today.
Saw plenty of ideas, but none met my playbook in a choppy open.
The mental capital spent watching was real though.
At some point, there's edge in shutting it down before you start forcing trades.
@tradertheory "Educated" people struggle because trading is a completely different performance domain.
It doesn’t reward being right, good trading rewards come from being consistent under uncertainty
“Best loser wins” is classic trading cliche.
But taking an L often isn't the problem.
What you do after that loss is.
Without a system, it turns into revenge trading.
With one, it's just the next trade within your edge
@corymitc I think knowing when not to trade comes down to having clear conditions that disqualify setups.
I agree though, most are focused on qualifying the entry conditions
@Wordsofrizdom For sure, retail has the advantage of choice.
But the real skill is turning that into constraints, especially on lower timeframes where precision is key.
Knowing exactly when a trade is allowed and when it isn’t, can be harder than it sounds
If size changes your execution,
you haven’t earned that level of risk.
It’s normal to want to size up after a win streak, but how consistent was the process that got you those wins?
@tradertheory The grind is important, but only pays off if each rep is reinforcing the same decision framework.
Otherwise you’re stacking time, not necssarily edge