Realised that didn't post the article here: we analysed thousands of questions from PhD students online to study taboo topics. Mental health was the most sensitive topic; supervision was the largest among the sensitive clusters: https://t.co/1l3nQXoY1j
A nice surprise this week: @timeshighered picked up our new article on taboo in doctoral education.
*experiencing socially acceptable academic delight*
Anonymity of social media posts highlights the subjects that doctoral candidates feel unable to discuss publicly, researchers say
https://t.co/KYnMHzluRF
Our new article in @EJHEEditors. Supervisor involvement matters most: engaging students in the academic community, co-authoring, and working on texts all raise the odds of completion. https://t.co/3KbGNRfoqG
We often rely on students' intentions as proxies for outcomes. Do they align? Not really. What I found: the correlation is low, students become more pessimistic during their studies, and using intentions as proxies can be misleading. https://t.co/AvLuYtRxMp
Our new paper: academically motivated doctoral students feel more positive about their programs, in line with Russia's focus on preparing for teaching/research careers
Investigating the perception of departmental climate in doctoral programmes, Maloshonok and Bekova's publication with #IETI_Journal is based on their data collected from 9 Russian universities. @SEDA_UK.
https://t.co/NAmbXqATI5
Doctoral students with prior undergraduate research experience have more chances to defend their thesis. However, support from supervisors and departments can mitigate the absence of such experience. Check out our new article https://t.co/YaxjDuGkpL
@otvyazno вообще пациенты и правда расстраиваются, моя доказательная гинекологиня получает негативные отзывы за то, что "сказала ничего не принимать, что это за лечение"