Karrie Sullivan

The Adoption Coach | Cracked the Code on AI Adoption | Certified F@€k!ng Delight

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@Simeon_Cps The root cause of LLMs not being the path to AGI is the people who build them and data they’re trained on. It would take an army of self actualized people (think: Clayton Christensen) to produce AGI. That army does not exist.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@Mayhem4Markets He’s incredibly good at hype and fleecing capital people out of capital.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@elonmusk Maybe we deserve to go extinct as a species. If humans are so opportunistically parasitic - why do we deserve to exist?

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@VraserX Contrast the cost to run these models, the abject lack of sustainable business model, the amount of capital being kicked up and down the food chain, and the human adoption rate.

If people don’t adopt - the capital propping it up eventually stops.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@MarioNawfal “Everyone’s playing empire builder”
This and the financial engineering are why the current short-term thinking hype bubble will burst.

If people don’t adopt - capital stops.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@Ajin66 @TheAhmadOsman

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

Frontier models haven’t figured out how to afford their own supply chains, UX, or how to structure healthy BUSINESS MODELS yet.

(Contrary to popular belief - sucking capital out of the ecosystem isn’t a business model)

The market and tech is already ripe for disruption.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

If most of the new AI tools that VCs are being approached with are built on Chinese open source and frontier model advancement is slowing… is it any wonder @ylecun is leaving Meta?

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

The endless ��blah blah” about LLM model advancement utterly misses the point that users change behavior slowly.

If people don’t adopt. The money stops.

Deliver value. Deliver UX. Be broadly useful.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@Simeon_Cps The root cause of LLMs not being the path to AGI is the people who build them and data they’re trained on. It would take an army of self actualized people (think: Clayton Christensen) to produce AGI. That army does not exist.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@satyanutella_ Just like corporate R&D and academia - science is hampered by mindsets and anxiety, @satyanadella. Same McKinsey OHI principles you use on talent… Find and fund scientists with mindsets like yours. Let them lead things and it won’t matter where they operate.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@animegfz There’s nothing wrong with a PhD.

There’s a lot wrong with PhDs leaders who gate-keep, believing only other PhDs are worthy of innovation.

Disfunction & lack of momentum = control, ego, and low EQ.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@animegfz There’s nothing wrong with a PhD.

There’s a lot wrong with PhDs leaders who gate-keep, believing only other PhDs are worthy of innovation.

Disfunction & lack of momentum = control, ego, and low EQ.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@jon_barron Most universities will have to go back to oral exams. That’s ok because debate and actual interaction with other students is a better way of learning than having some PhD pontificate for hours.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@aakashgupta And we wonder why @ylecun is leaving Meta? 👀

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@SawyerMerritt That’s assuming he doesn’t have to go back and rescue Amazon from Jassey.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@satyanutella_ BTW - start-up accelerators and VCs profile psychologically like bankers with gambling habits, @satyanadella.

VC portfolios suck for a reason: they couldn’t recognize the next Jobs if he rose from the grave and smacked them with a fully formed business model and traction.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@satyanutella_ Just like corporate R&D and academia - science is hampered by mindsets and anxiety, @satyanadella. Same McKinsey OHI principles you use on talent… Find and fund scientists with mindsets like yours. Let them lead things and it won’t matter where they operate.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@thejefflutz Why would a company that has a brand rooted in customers, privacy, and human centered UX partner with Musk? He’s not someone who cares much about people. He’s a complex problem solver but couldn’t read the room to save his life.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@ElonClipsX Capitalism is amoral. Capitalists aren’t.

Most capitalists are angry, fearful, anxiety ridden children.

A few megalomaniacs with little ability to even read the room let alone care about other humans will be capable of solving for this. It’s why they build bunkers on islands.

[Karrie Sullivan @karriesullivan]

@JannaLevin They imagined HAL to be capable of fear (anger, shame, etc.) but not capable of learning from it. AGI would have to not only experience these things but actually learn and evolve from them. Very few humans are willing or able to do this themselves. How would they teach AI?