🚨Championship Voting is LIVE🚨
🗳️Retweet this post and reply with #KnoxvilleBCT to vote!
Winner will be announced 5pm EST Friday 9/27
Online Voting Ends 9/27 @ 1:00pmEST
@FireballWhisky @HeyDudeShoes
🚨Semifinal Voting is LIVE🚨
Retweet this post & reply with #KnoxvilleBCT to vote!
Winners announced 1pm EST Monday 9/22
Online Voting Ends 9/19 @ 11:59pmEST
Come out to Yeehaw Knoxville, 6-9PM, Saturday 9/21 to watch the Vols & vote for Knoxville!
Today was a normal day in my life as a technical Product Manager:
- Made final decisions on safety-critical testing requirements
- Removed a buggy feature from the codebase
- Deployed the latest release
- Taught some engineers what dry shampoo does
I love being a #WomanInTech
If you have a risky product...
you're going to have a harder time reaching the risk-averse mainstream market.
Early adopters ARE willing to accept some level of risk:
✅ technology enthusiasts want to get their hands on new tech and push it to it's limits
✅ visionary, forward-thinking leaders want to get a competitive edge by getting their hands on it before everyone else
The mainstream market is NOT willing to accept the risk:
❌ they've been burned before by following visionary leaders who adopted new untrusted tech (and then left them to pick up the pieces)
❌ they are thinking through the practicality of adopting software (onboarding, documentation, integrations, partnerships, security, compliance, etc.)
The break between these groups is known as "the Chasm," a concept coined by Warren Schirtzinger and popularized by @geoffreyamoore.
There's been lots of pushback to the concept over the last few decades.
"Is there REALLY a chasm?"
In reality, it's a spectrum.
The amount of risk a technology brings...
...determines if there's a chasm
...and how BIG the chasm actually is
Take some examples below:
@Calendly has virtually no risk. The mainstream market can adopt it without an issue.
If you're talking about reaching enterprise companies, then a small chasm starts to form (i.e. rolling out Calendly to 50,000 employees is a little different than 50 employees).
But the "early market" of Calendly was extremely large from a PLG perspective, and it allowed Calendly to become a known quantity that made moving into the enterprise way less risky (having tens of millions of users makes you seem a little more legit, as you can imagine).
@SlackHQ had a bigger chasm to cross than Calendly.
If you can imagine, there was a time when MOST companies operated through email. EMAIL!
Slack brought an entirely new paradigm for communication (channels, much more synchronous/chat-style, open type of messaging).
Would people adopt this new method?
Ultimately, they too were able to utilize PLG and mass-market adoption to make this transition from the early market to the mainstream market.
@neuralink’s chasm may be too large to cross (at least for the next decade).
Implanting chips into people's brains at a large scale bears a TREMENDOUS amount of risk (from almost every possible angle imaginable) for the mainstream market.
Time will tell if it can be crossed (or not!)
#productmarketing #saas #startups #gotomarket #positioning
GIVEAWAY: TWO (2) #SXSW MUSIC BADGES ($1,890 TOTAL VALUE)
How do you win?
1) RT this
2) Follow @partywithdirty
That's it. Winner (one winner gets both badges) announced 12pm Friday 2/23. Go!
Sharing a birthday month with such inspiring people like Betty White, Martin Luther King Jr., Stephen Hawking, Dolly Parton, Elvis Presley and Lin-Manuel Miranda is pretty cool 🎂 #HappyBirthdayBettyWhite and to all the #JanuaryBabies