SoccerMom

Wife, Mom & Agent from the Mitten

[🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 @LionelMedia]

In (perhaps) a futile attempt at clarification I provide the following. The defense filing does not concede guilt, does not identify Tyler Robinson as the shooter and does not adopt or conceded the State’s theory of the homicide. It attacks the evidentiary foundation supporting probable cause. That distinction matters. The defense argues that portions of the State’s case rest on hearsay, inference and secondhand attribution rather than competent evidence establishing Robinson’s identity as the person who fired the fatal shot. It further contends that even if the court accepts the prosecution’s own theory of a single targeted shot, the alleged facts do not satisfy the statutory aggravator necessary to elevate the case into death-penalty territory. In other words, the filing is not an admission disguised as argument. It is a challenge to whether the State has legally connected this defendant to the shooting and whether its own factual theory supports the enhanced punishment it seeks. Those are threshold questions the prosecution must answer. But don't tell @bennyjohnson that.

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@USMCMom2016 @DLoesch It means you’re all lying unless you are trying to tell me the defense wrote 30 pages of confessions & then just for fun ended it with “in conclusion” you haven’t demonstrated probable clause at all & you damn sure didn’t demonstrate the aggravating factor needed for a death case

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@Silence2691 @anonhamster1 @Rach4Patriarchy You got it right.

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@sippicup2 So you think in this filing:
1. Defense admitted guilt to killing CK and agreed with all the evidence presented by prosecution?
2. Then in a shocking twist concluded by saying you didn't prove shit & this should not be bound over for trial? 👍

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@sippicup2 How are they supposed to discuss the evidence without stating what it is? I can’t believe the dishonesty going around. Describing the evidence is not admitting or conceding. 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@bravoCo104498 So you think in this filing:
1. Defense admitted guilt to killing CK and agreed with all the evidence presented by prosecution?
2. Then in a shocking twist concluded by saying you didn't prove shit & this should not be bound over for trial?

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@catturd2 So you think in this filing:
1. Defense admitted guilt to killing CK and agreed with all the evidence presented by prosecution?
2. Then in a shocking twist concluded by saying you didn't prove shit & this should not be bound over for trial? 👍

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@catturd2 So you think in this filing:
1. Defense admitted guilt to killing CK and agreed with all the evidence presented by prosecution?
2. Then in a shocking twist concluded by saying you didn't prove shit & this should not be bound over for trial? 👍

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@Kikinroks1 @KingOffX_ I can’t have a logical discussion with you because you are not understanding the basic facts & don’t seem to understand the OP’s point.

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@Kikinroks1 @KingOffX_ Yes it does. The conclusion says the prosecution failed to prove probable cause (in yellow) as well as failed to prove the aggravating factor for death case (following sentences). Is your point really that they admitted guilt throughout filing & then concluded the opposite?

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@sippicup2 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@JackPosobiec Why are you so dishonest?!?

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@__0HOUR1_ They are describing the evidence to make their point. That is not admitting anything. Why are you so dishonest?

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@RealAmVoice @JackPosobiec @willchamberlain Describing the evidence is admitting guilt? You people are SOOOOOOO dishonest.

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

Amazing how many people think that
Tyler Robinson’s defense describing the evidence presented by prosecution is somehow admitting guilt. Dishonest or dumb. You decide!

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@zackpeter Wrong

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@SarahisCensored Wrong.

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@Kikinroks1 @KingOffX_ Um yeah - why are you telling me this?

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@byRegie @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman Liar

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@anonhamster1 @Rach4Patriarchy *probable.

[SoccerMom @karynrenee]

@anonhamster1 @Rach4Patriarchy The highlighted section is talking about probably cause in general. The sentences following highlighted part are about aggravated factors. Do you see where it says “in addition”?