올림픽공원에서 자유롭게 들어가지 못하게 통제한 사람들은 조직적으로 움직였는데 어느 조직이냐고 물어보면 한결같이 "개인의 자발적 자원봉사"라고 계속 말합니다. 그렇게 말하라고 시켰지요. 누군가가.
성조기 들면 화를 내며 못들게 하고. 왜요?
부정선거라고 말하면 하지 말라고 통제할려고 하고. 이렇게 통제를 좋아하는 단체들이 있죠. 아무리 "개인의 자발적 봉사" 라고 말해도. 사실이 아니니까.
2026-6-7. Olympic Park, Seoul. Lots of cell phone towers added (on top of LG U+, SK, & unmarked vehicle). But South Koreans who want clean elections gathered there don't have mobile phone service for some reason. So what else do these cell phone towers do? Simple. Collecting cell phone IDs, so they can find out who was there. This is something the CCP would do. But occurring in South Korea.
Before "5.18" in Gwangju, there was "5.15" in Seoul in 1980.
In Seoul on 1980-5-15, radical leftist student activists used the bus as a weapon to kill police officers by running over them.
This is not a "democracy movement." Those who want to add "5.18" in the ROK Constitution want to hide "5.15."
Interesting that Chinese teahouse Chagee recently (2026-4-30) launched in South Korea. Immediately, the pro-CCP faction (including DPK lawmakers, Lee Jae-myung administration, etc) attacks Starbucks, a US company, calling for its boycott & investigating Chairman of Shinsegae Group (owns Starbucks Korea).
Chinese spies flew drones over these South Korean sensitive areas (the presidential office buildings, intelligence bldgs, military facilities) to collect intelligence, including imagery.
Now they're all marked in detail in Chinese map apps. Some of the Chinese spies were caught, but released, not prosecuted, because there are no laws to prosecute Chinese spies.
President Yoon Suk-yeol tried to get a law amended to prosecute Chinese spies. but the DPK (Democratic Party of Korea) vehemently opposed it. It was one of the many reasons for Yoon calling martial law--against the tyranny of legislative dictatorship of the anti-state, pro-CCP forces (and the election fraud that made a huge majority for the DPK, which enabled the legislative dictatorship).
Filing a criminal charge against Chung Yong-jin (Chairman, Shinsegae Group, which operates Starbucks in Korea) for an annual promotion ("Tank Day") at Starbucks?
This intimidation tactic is CCP-style.
It's also anti-US to go after an American company Starbucks, to clear the way for Chinese tea shop Chagee. (Just like them going after an American firm Coupang to make way for Chinese Temu & Alibaba).
& what does the promotion have to do with "5.18" gag law? The law is designed to suppress freedom of speech.
From a friend in Korea, about Lee Jae-myung alignment with Hamas:
“I am writing to share serious concerns regarding recent remarks made by South Korean President Lee Jae-myung that many Korean conservatives and pro-American citizens believe deserve international attention.
On May 20, during a cabinet meeting, President Lee publicly criticized Israel over the interception of Gaza-bound activist vessels carrying Korean nationals affiliated with pro-Palestinian organizations.
Article:
https://t.co/R6U1mNI8H0
According to the report, President Lee repeatedly questioned whether Israel had any legal authority to intercept the vessels, asked whether Israel had committed ‘illegal aggression,’ and argued that South Korea should consider formally responding against Israel over the detention of Korean activists.
Most notably, he directly referenced the International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and stated that South Korea should also ‘judge’ the matter itself.
For many Koreans who support the U.S.-ROK alliance and the broader democratic alliance system, these remarks were shocking.
The issue here is not simply about humanitarian aid.
The flotilla movement targeting Gaza has long been viewed by many security experts and pro-Israel observers as a highly politicized international campaign designed specifically to undermine Israel’s maritime blockade against Hamas.
Israel’s blockade exists because Hamas is not merely a ‘political actor,’ but a U.S.-designated terrorist organization responsible for mass civilian killings, kidnappings, rocket attacks, and ongoing cooperation with Iran-backed extremist networks.
For years, security experts have warned that maritime access routes into Gaza could be exploited for weapons smuggling, logistical support, intelligence operations, and propaganda campaigns benefiting Hamas and its allies.
Yet despite these realities, President Lee framed the incident almost entirely through accusations against Israel itself.
During the cabinet meeting, he reportedly asked:
‘Is that Israeli territorial water?’
‘Can they capture and detain third-country vessels?’
‘Is this not illegal aggression under international law?’
At no point did the president appear to seriously address the security concerns that led to the blockade in the first place.
This imbalance is precisely why many Koreans are alarmed.
To many observers, President Lee’s rhetoric increasingly resembles the language used by radical anti-Israel activist groups throughout Western universities, progressive NGOs, and transnational left-wing movements that routinely portray Israel as the primary aggressor while downplaying Hamas terrorism.
The ICC reference was particularly disturbing.
Within the American conservative movement, the ICC is widely viewed as a politicized institution increasingly weaponized against democratic U.S. allies such as Israel while failing to meaningfully confront authoritarian states, Islamist extremist groups, or Chinese Communist Party abuses.
For a South Korean president to publicly invoke the ICC against the leader of one of America’s closest allies is being interpreted by many Korean conservatives as a symbolic diplomatic shift away from the traditional pro-U.S. and pro-Western posture that has defined South Korea’s security framework for decades.
This development comes at a dangerous time.
China is expanding regional influence.
North Korea continues military escalation.
Iran-backed extremist movements are destabilizing the Middle East.
Anti-Western political narratives are rapidly spreading through global activist networks.
Under these circumstances, many Koreans believe South Korea should be strengthening solidarity with the United States and Israel — not echoing rhetoric commonly associated with anti-Western activist movements hostile to the democratic alliance itself.
"가자지구 가는데 이스라엘 영해를 지나야 돼요?"
어제 국무회의에서 이재명이 불쑥 던진 이 한마디는, 단순한 말실수를 넘어선 일종의 서늘한 공포물이다. 동네 호프집 취객의 입에서 나온 질문이라면 그저 혀를 차고 넘길 일이다. 그러나 일국의 외교와 안보를 책임지는 최정점에 앉아 있는 자가 공식 석상에서 마이크를 쥐고 배설한 텍스트라면 이야기는 완벽히 달라진다.
지중해와 맞닿은 가자지구의 지리적 고립과 이스라엘 해군의 전면적인 해상 봉쇄는 수십 년간 이어진 국제 정치의 뼈대이자 기본 상식이다. 왜 구호선단이 번번이 이스라엘 통제선에서 나포되고 국제적 마찰이 빚어지는지, 중동 지도를 단 한 번이라도 들여다보거나 국제 뉴스의 헤드라인만 읽었어도 절대 입 밖으로 꺼낼 수 없는 끔찍한 질문이다.
이스라엘 정상을 향해 "체포" 운운하며 국제 인권 심판관 행세를 하더니, 정작 중동 지정학의 기초적인 물리적 현실조차 파악하지 못하고 있었던 것이다. 팩트와 기초 지식이 결여된 자의 얄팍한 혓바닥이 얼마나 쉽게 국가의 외교 안보를 희화화하고 벼랑 끝으로 몰아넣을 수 있는지 증명하는 가장 투명한 장면이다.
무지(無知)가 신념을 만나 권력을 쥐면 그 자체로 거대한 재앙이 된다. 지도 한 장 제대로 읽어낼 줄 모르는 이 참담한 지적 밑천을 목도하고도 여전히 맹목적인 환호를 보내는 민주당 지지자들에게 건조하고도 뼈아픈 질문을 던지고 싶다.
이 정도의 지식수준을 가진 사람에게, 진짜 이 나라를 맡겨도 되는 거냐고.
Pro-CCP Jung Chung-rae of DPK (Democratic Party of Korea) is confused about history. He criticizes Starbucks in Korea for having a "Tank Day" & tries to blame the South Korean government (in 1980, it was under rhe Choi Kyu-hwa administration, not Chun Doo-hwan), but he ends up describing what happened in China.
"How can those scenes of mercilessly slaughtering and suppressing citizens with tanks..." That didn't happen in South Korea, but at Tiananmen Square & throughout the city of Beijing in 1989/6/3-4.
https://t.co/nFs17bnlUH
Horrible Congressman Thomas Massie put out an old Endorsement, from many years ago, of him by me long before I found out that he was the Worst Congressman in the History of our Country. I endorsed Ed Gallrein, a true American Patriot, which Massie knows full well, so the statement that he put out is fraudulent, just like HE is fraudulent. WITHDRAW YOUR FAKE STATEMENT, MASSIE, RIGHT NOW! President DONALD J. TRUMP
박상용 검사를 징계 청구하면서 술 반입은 제외됐다.
연어 술 파티는 없었다고 봤다.
연어 술 파티를 징계 사유에 포함하면 법원 소송에서 질 것이 뻔하기 때문에 넣을 수 없었을 것이다.
이로써 이화영은 “연어 술 파티”에 대해 위증했고, 서영교 등 장단 맞춘 민주당 의원들은 위증교사한 셈이 됐다.
결국, 대북 송금 800만 불에 대해 이재명 지사에게 17차례 보고했었다는 이화영 진술에 힘이 실리게 됐다.
술 얻어먹고 회유됐다는 거짓 주장이 단번에 깨졌기 때문이다.
혹 떼려다가 붙인 격이다. 공소취소할 하등의 이유도 없어졌다.
https://t.co/khLsBbV7sw