@Dragao110@JoJoFromJerz Bah, this isn't big news or anything. The n95's are better and provide protection. The ear loop ones do prevent some degree of SPREAD by containing the release of one's breath a bit, but yea, if you are in a storm of covid particles and wearing this, not gonna help much.
@jordanbpeterson@pfizer Finding: Jordan Peterson either makes things up (lies) to suit his preferred conclusion, or he is very, very bad at interpreting scientific studies.
Conclusion: We can't trust anything that Jordan Peterson has to say on science (or perhaps anything else).
@david_r_morgan Here's something fun to offer a slightly different take.. not sure how far you've fallen, but don't forget to keep your skepticism in tact! Some things are true, but not all... take good care. https://t.co/pBpB6rzKb8
@david_r_morgan Just double check with yourself that you haven't fallen "deeper" than is actually "real" (this happens). Some things are a conspiracy, but not all. Fact check and examine the sources of your info carefully. Apply skepticism to both MSM and to your "new" sources of info.
@Harry__Faulkner People need to understand that clips like this intentionally made to mislead you.. the end of her sentence was missing. She's NOT saying what it sounds like she's saying.
@Memento84794418 @CDCgov Just watched him a month later. So - the protection of the updated booster sounds like it's about equal. Not sure where I got the side effect from. That actually might have been a lie. my bad. https://t.co/5fGhtoCu69
@Memento84794418 @CDCgov hey! I'm open to being wrong. I got my info from an interview with Paul Offit (worked for CDC in the past and sits on the FDA board (i think)). He talked about it here. Feel free to message back if you think i misunderstood. https://t.co/iRDDPRlUaY
@DeGirlDeBoy@CDCgov the study shows better outcomes for the unvaxxed, but why are there over 10,000 unvaxxed cases studied, and only about 100 vaxxed? Trying to be objective here - are more people admitted to hospital unvaxxed? Just trying to understand...
@jordanbpeterson As a trusted figure, please share the data/studies that led you to land firmly in this conclusion. So many "experts" disagree, and most of us don't have access to proper data nor the skills to properly assess it - show us what tipped you to this side of the issue please!
@jordanbpeterson@Forbes I'm glad you are evaluating the non-mainstream conclusions around the vaccines as I trust you will be thorough and rigorous. I don't have the right kind of education / access to relevant data needed to parse out the truth. My own research would suck, so I defer to experts.
@jordanbpeterson@theJagmeetSingh Genuine question - how do we know that Peterson isn't actually (knowingly or not) a propaganda puppet for oil companies and other known (and proven) polluters?
@jordanbpeterson@joerogan Your alternate vision of the WEF sounds good. I'd be mindful to not alienate the LGBT community - many of us are with you, but it grates a bit when you name "Heterosexual" as the ideal. I'm sure your thoughts are more nuanced on this, just a matter of how it might come across
@RWMaloneMD Depending on your basic belief structure, some people read this and go, "oh, they are looking at potential future mutations in order to improve the vaccine", while other go "oh, they are looking at making the virus stronger in order to kill us all faster". I vote for the prior.
@mmek_answer42@JamesMelville Cropped and out of context... perfect for bias confirmation. It's scary how many people dont realize this. Admittedly, I fell for it too for a short while.