Principal/Founder at Katz Development | design + sustainability-driven real estate developer | Development Consulting | Mass Timber | @rinoart GID Board
It's sciency, but here is our Whole Building Life Cycle Analysis quantifying Return to Form's carbon emission impact, and a comparative cost analysis of our building as mass timber, concrete and steel.
https://t.co/HfX3q55Xec
@Mikey_Tay1or@seandsweeney Nice! Can I ask a few questions, and feel free to DM if easier:
What market?
Can you share your untrended YOC and total cost/unit?
Thanks!
@EllliotttB Don't take my word for it, but tons of new studies/data out there. I don't really buy the low-carbon concrete yet. Wood construction (I think) is the only way to lower embodied carbon in construction today.
@EllliotttB Not sure it can be totally solved. If agricultural/forest land is no longer profitable as that, some higher use will buy, clear cut it, and no more forest land.
If the timber industry is healthy, generally a good thing for forest health. Growing mass timber industry is good.
@aussieflya@pushtheneedle Yep, IV-A is unchanged in '24. Full encapsulation. But other projects like Ascent have been successful in getting a variance to ~50% exposure
@pushtheneedle@aussieflya Yep we got IV-B to 100% exposure in the '24 IBC. We got Denver to adopt that provision early. I think a few other cities have as well
@aussieflya@pushtheneedle We are 12 stories. 15 stories would be Type IV-A which would require full encapsulation of the timber (unless they go for a variance like other tall wood bldgs have). Single stair in a Type IV-A is wild, I'm interested to learn more