@iujonb@shipit888@PokerGO@WSOP@ChancesCards you are entitled to seeing the showdown and having the information; you are also entitled to have more than 40minutes to eat dinner
@GPHPokerPro@AllenKessler Being less paranoid is an option. Don't you think it's annoying when people assume you are cheating when you are just talking about soccer or your next vacation with your buddy ?
@AbrahamMobley@Ray_Henson@dwpoker@BobMatherPoker@WSOP@Kevmath It's a dumb rule; I can just text my friend whatever I only want him to hear, or tell him 3 feet away from the table.
Most of the time we are just talking about anything but poker in between hands and people that complain are uptight idiots, paranoids or xenophobes.
@PhilGalfond@JustinBonomo The grandpa analogy is actually perfect; at the time it wasn't clear or consensus that multi accouting was unethical.
Of course if you think long and hard on it you can arrive to that conclusion; but still it's not same offense as Ali.
@RyanLeng9 @RyanFeePoker@WSOP What about a rule that if multiple/majority persons at you table complain that you are never shutting up you are asked to be silent unless directly spoken to ?
@DeMaci_Poker I mean a bigger wrong doesn't make it right. Doing that on the big stage will just encourage more stalling. At least here he pays a price for it (in timebanks) so you can kind of justify it as a strategic decision. But in no shot clock events it would be disgusting.