Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph

Currently working on: MIMETIC DESIRE AND COLLECTIVE FERVOR: AN ETHNOGRAPHY OF #ROAMCULT (MA Thesis)

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

joke about the outcomes you want strikes again

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

Can someone already write the history/ethnography of #roamcult circa 2020?

That was such a fascinating experience

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

@reddy2go https://t.co/VbZPncADlk

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

We're all just learning this as we go. My takeaway from part III of @akoustov's series on using AI for scholarly work: own the "I"!

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

These amazing works of AI tend to be misleading. Eg this one "only" took 4 hours to make. But turns out the creator spent 20 years in the industry. When I went to a Runway ML FB group, all the uploaded vids looked like slop. We're in the chaotic phase of a restructuring of the world economy due to new tech. This has happened a few times in the past that we can kinda know the shape of game, even if it will be unique. It's tempting to jump into new lanes. If I were in my 20s, I'd try all the lanes and see which ones I like. But I already know the answer! More than sunk cost fallacy, its my past obsessions which guide me which frontier I should invest my time and brainspace in: scholarship, education, and perhaps storytelling (with the written word), but keeping tabs on adjacent lanes and players.

[Always Generating @notiansans]

What started off as a workflow test, just an idea, quickly had me locked into a flow state. 4 hours total from completely blank slate to finished video.

I can’t believe we’re all so lucky to have this at our fingertips.

🔊 sound on 🔊 @runwayml

[Alan Smith @AlanJLSmith]

Have you watched The Manosphere with Louis Theroux on Netflix?

As the Dad of a 17 year old son, I think @jimmycarr is spot on.

What do you think?

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

vibe coded my first app today https://t.co/bokBsVIVn3

[𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚆𝙷𝙸𝚃𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙱𝙱𝙸𝚃 @White_Rabbit_OG]

INNER PEACE POLICE STRIKES AGAIN 🚨🪩💥

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

Hot take: the USA is Apollonian; China is Christian

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

I'm curious about how you'd solve this:
how do you capture all this? how you think, how you react, how you make decisions? i do not believe it should be thru passive background surveillance.

A possibly related experiment https://t.co/Ldl1QwhW3o

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

I experimented with A.I. in my retreat this year. I uploaded 100 journal-ish docs from the past 15 years to ChatGPT, totaling 91,707 words. Here's one output: sentiment analysis across time in diff dimensions.

It captured the bad thing that happened in 2018 and my recovery (more of reinvention) and the renewed joy in the past few years. I was surprised how it sensed the continued increase of my agency in the past 15 years (blue line). More than the graphical interpretation, what's interesting are its answers when I ask it why (eg, what made it think my agency was increasing all those years).

I also had it apply various personality models (OCEAN, MBTI, Enneagram) but nothing really surprising.

What else could I try?

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

@heyohelen @visakanv sounds interesting. do you have a thread or something on this?

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

@_antarikshh @visakanv i'm scanning this entire thread and so far this takes the gold medal

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

@theproteindance @visakanv there is no antimememtics ai

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

@exgenesis @visakanv nice! are there tools i can beta test for you using my thesis on roamcult? https://t.co/gJOdsr37AW

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

joke about the outcomes you want strikes again

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

@visakanv fulfilling a prophesy https://t.co/gJOdsr37AW

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

joke about the outcomes you want strikes again

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

@shoppingtheatre yes, it's a bit of autoethnography

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

joke about the outcomes you want strikes again

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

Can someone already write the history/ethnography of #roamcult circa 2020?

That was such a fascinating experience

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

pomo instincts are actually helpful

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

Roamcult was "provincial

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

New Twitter game

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

joke about the outcomes you want strikes again

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

planting my flag https://t.co/lmaMnaG0AZ

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

Marc Andreessen just dropped ~105 mins on Lenny's Podcast covering AI, jobs, careers, and why everyone is panicking about the wrong thing.

Just the clearest macro framework I've heard on where AI actually lands.

My notes:

𝟭. 𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝘁.

US productivity growth has been running at half the rate of the 1940-1970 era and a third the rate of 1870-1940. The global population is declining below replacement in dozens of countries, including China. Without AI, we would be panicking about economies shrinking from depopulation, not job loss.

The timing is almost miraculous. This is what Andreessen means when he says the real boom has not started yet. We have been in a 50-year productivity drought, and most people do not even realize it.

𝟮. 𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗿'𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗲.

Isaac Newton spent decades trying to transmute lead into gold and never succeeded. AI does something more powerful: it converts sand (silicon) into thought. The most common material in the world is the rarest output.

This one metaphor reframes the entire AI conversation. You do not have a job loss problem. You have a philosopher's stone sitting on your desk that you are not using enough.

𝟯. 𝗔𝗜 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁.

The best coders right now are not reporting 2x productivity. They are reporting 10x. The gap between "pretty good with AI" and "elite with AI" is widening, not narrowing.

This is the most important signal for career planning right now. If you are just using AI to do the same job slightly faster, you are leaving the real leverage on the table.

𝟰. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝗮 𝗠𝗲𝘅𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗳𝗳 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗣𝗠𝘀, 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀.

Every engineer now thinks they can be a PM and designer. Every PM thinks they can code and design. Every designer knows they can do both. And they are all correct, because AI enables each role to absorb the tasks of the other two.

I have seen this firsthand in the investing world. The analyst who can build models and write narratives is 5x more valuable than someone who can do only one. The same convergence is happening in the product.

𝟱. 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗧-𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗱. 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝗮𝗻 𝗘-𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗿.

Scott Adams could not have created Dilbert by being the world's best cartoonist or the world's best business mind. He needed both. The additive effect of two skills is more than double. Three skills are more than triple. Larry Summers puts it differently: don't be fungible.

The person who can code, design, and ship a product is no longer a unicorn. They are the new baseline for "extremely valuable." If you are only one of those three things, you are increasingly replaceable.

𝟲. 𝗝𝗼𝗯𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀. 𝗧𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲. 𝗝𝗼𝗯𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁.

Executives never typed their own emails in the 1970s. Secretaries printed incoming emails and hand-delivered them. Both roles survived the transition, just with different task sets. The same will happen with AI and coding, PM work, and design.

Everyone obsessing over "will my job disappear" is asking the wrong question. The right question is: which tasks in my job are about to rotate, and am I ready to pick up the new ones?

𝟳. 𝗔𝗜 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗮𝗯𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿.

We went from human calculators to machine code to assembly to C to scripting languages. Each layer was dismissed by the previous generation. Each time, the new layer won, and total coding employment grew. AI coding is the same pattern, not a rupture.

The Perl programmers of 2005, laughing at JavaScript, are the C programmers of 1995, laughing at scripting. History rhymes, and it always rewards the people who adopt the next abstraction first.

𝟴. 𝗔𝗜 𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲𝘀 𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.

One-on-one tutoring is the only method proven to move a student from the 50th to the 99th percentile (Bloom's two sigma effect). It used to require being born into royalty. Alexander the Great was tutored by Aristotle. Now, any kid with a phone can access the same quality of personalized instruction.

This is the most under-discussed consequence of AI. Every parent reading this should be supplementing their kid's education with structured AI tutoring right now. Not next year. Now.

𝟵. 𝗣𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗲𝗹 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗻𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗱.

Progress in bits masked stagnation in atoms. The built world is barely different from 50 years ago. Same bridges from the 1930s, same dams from the 1910s. Cartels, monopolies, unions, and regulations prevent the rate of change that people had 100 years ago.

This is also why AI will not transform everything overnight. Institutional sclerosis is real. Healthcare alone could take a generation. If you are building in atoms, budget for a war of attrition, not a blitzkrieg.

𝟭𝟬. 𝗠𝗼𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘂𝗻𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗻.

Within a year of ChatGPT's launch, five American companies, five Chinese companies, and open-source all had roughly equivalent models. DeepSeek emerged from a hedge fund in China and basically replicated the American labs' work. The smartest AI insiders privately admit there aren't many real secrets among the big labs.

This is the most honest take I have heard from a top-tier VC. No one knows if the value accrues to models, apps, or infrastructure. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling you certainty they do not have.

𝟭𝟭. 𝗔𝗜 𝗜𝗤 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀.

Human IQ caps around 160 because of biology. Current AI models test around 130-140. There is no theoretical ceiling stopping AI from reaching 200, 250, or 300. The concept of AGI as a "human equivalent" will be a footnote because AI will race past that threshold.

This is the frame that makes the "will AI take my job" debate feel small. We are not building a replacement for human thought. We are building something that will be better than the best human thought has ever been.

𝟭𝟮. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘀.

Layer one: AI redefines products. Layer two: AI redefines jobs within companies. Layer three, which has not dropped yet: AI redefines the very concept of having a company. The holy grail is the one-person, billion-dollar outcome, and the best founders are chasing it.

Satoshi did it with Bitcoin. Instagram and WhatsApp came close with tiny teams. The question is no longer if this is possible with software. The question is how many of these we will see in the next five years.

AI is the philosopher's stone. The question is whether you pick it up.

The full podcast is worth your time. Link in replies.

[Kahlil Corazo 🧭 Explorations.ph @kcorazo]

it is looking like my next gig is not a book but an after-school academy where diagnosis, individualized learning plans, and the act of learning is orchestrated by ai and mimetic desire is orchestrated by humans