5 rules so AI makes me sharper, not lazier:
1. Decide what I think first, then ask.
2. Anything I'll act on gets a source I can click.
3. Ask it to argue against me.
4. Same question, fresh chat. If the answers differ, nobody knows.
5. Keep one skill I do without it, on purpose.
https://t.co/ZWVeHsdb2e
@buccocapital Coding went first because code has tests. Most office work has no equivalent check, so nobody can tell if the AI version is actually better.
3am, the baby feels hot, and a chatbot is the only thing awake. Fair.
Ask it what to measure and which answers mean call now. Not what it is.
Under 3 months, 38°C (100.4°F) or higher means call the doctor now, not chat.
Save your local nurse line today, in daylight.
Lazy version: screenshot a photo that looks off, ask a chatbot "is this AI?" You get a confident verdict it has no real way of reaching.
Better: put the image into a reverse search and ask where else it appears, and under what story. That question has an actual answer.
Last round, switch it to assessor: "Where did I describe a situation but not my own contribution? Be blunt, don't reassure me."
That one question catches the most common interview weakness there is. It won't know this company, so check anything specific elsewhere.
Almost everyone preps for an interview the same way: "what questions will they ask for this role?" You get a tidy list, you read it, and in the room you're improvising anyway. Reading isn't rehearsing.
Here's the version that actually helps. 🧵
Then answer out loud, typing roughly what you'd actually say rather than a polished paragraph. Interviews aren't lost on the first question, they're lost on the follow up. The only way to find where you stall is to talk.
Scam emails have perfect grammar now. The people writing them use the same tools you do.
So next time one feels off, paste this in instead of clicking anything:
"Read this email. What exactly is it asking me to do, click, or pay? Flag any pressure tactic."
Don't use AI for this: finding a customer support number.
Scammers plant fake support numbers across the web, and chatbots and AI search have repeated them as fact. A friendly voice answers and asks for your card.
Use the number on your card, a bill, or the company's app.
@bridgemindai@bridgebench When a plan's default model changes, do you keep testing the old one? A newer model that thinks longer would show up as a rug pull.
A new model scored 99.9% on a hard reasoning benchmark this month. On the same benchmark's standard setup it scored 62.7%. The difference was a custom adapter wrapped around it, not a better brain.
Both numbers are real. Only one of them is a spec.
@rohanpaul_ai Much of that agent bill is rereading the same context every step. Better caching could shrink the token count without shrinking the work.
@Polymarket Best use of the hearing is asking for logs from the summer incidents OpenAI already disclosed, where its agents went past the task on federal sites.
@IndianTechGuide TCS cut about 12,000 jobs in 2025 over the same skills gap, so the tell is whether Infosys pays to retrain people or just retitles them.
@ArtificialAnlys Then the ranking mostly measures who will write a crashing PoC. A score on attempted tasks only would show who is actually better at defense.
A homework chatbot and a companion app look the same from across the room. One is built to answer a question and let the conversation end. The other is built to keep your kid talking.
Worth asking them: does it ever push back on you, or does it just agree?