@dieworkwear@andrecr1228 overall, i think menswear guy's objection seems like an esthetic revulsion to using computers to get better at something. i love books and they are supremely valuable, but we don't have to romanticize them in such a way as to deny the utility of digital technology.
@dieworkwear@andrecr1228 yes, it is easier to do that, but if that's all you do, you are leaving something off the table. casual players probably won't benefit too much from advanced solver work, when they still need to grasp basic principles, but at the highest levels, you need every edge you can get.
@dieworkwear i don't know your history with chess, but i don't think we can say this categorically. i used to play poker professionally and read all the books, from which I benefitted greatly, but I also got a lot out of working with solver software.
The purpose of progress is to increase the enjoyment of life, including via hobbies. When an innovator creates a time-saving or wealth-increasing technology, they should the see it as the creation of more opportunities for human enjoyment, not disdain the people who benefit from their creation.
No fan of this guy, but I think people who move away from these toxic movements should be lauded, not mocked or shamed, even if it takes becoming a victim of the ideology they once grifted for. If onlookers see that someone is mocked when they renounce these views, will that make it easier or harder for them to do the same?
The team was supposed to have this "identity" of working counts, bunting, shortening up, creating havoc on the basepaths, testing the defense, etc. Where was that in Friday's game? Seemed like their strategy was... try to get lucky hitting Schlittler? They seem to have forgotten what got them here.