Ken McVicker

[Benjamin Domenech @bdomenech]

“Fellow Citizens, I am not wanting in respect for the fathers of this republic. The signers of the Declaration of Independence were brave men. They were great men too — great enough to give fame to a great age. It does not often happen to a nation to raise, at one time, such a number of truly great men. The point from which I am compelled to view them is not, certainly, the most favorable; and yet I cannot contemplate their great deeds with less than admiration. They were statesmen, patriots and heroes, and for the good they did, and the principles they contended for, I will unite with you to honor their memory.

“They loved their country better than their own private interests; and, though this is not the highest form of human excellence, all will concede that it is a rare virtue, and that when it is exhibited, it ought to command respect. He who will, intelligently, lay down his life for his country, is a man whom it is not in human nature to despise. Your fathers staked their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor, on the cause of their country. In their admiration of liberty, they lost sight of all other interests.

“They were peace men; but they preferred revolution to peaceful submission to bondage. They were quiet men; but they did not shrink from agitating against oppression. They showed forbearance; but that they knew its limits. They believed in order; but not in the order of tyranny. With them, nothing was “settled” that was not right. With them, justice, liberty and humanity were “final;” not slavery and oppression. You may well cherish the memory of such men. They were great in their day and generation. Their solid manhood stands out the more as we contrast it with these degenerate times.

“How circumspect, exact and proportionate were all their movements! How unlike the politicians of an hour! Their statesmanship looked beyond the passing moment, and stretched away in strength into the distant future. They seized upon eternal principles, and set a glorious example in their defense. Mark them!

“Fully appreciating the hardship to be encountered, firmly believing in the right of their cause, honorably inviting the scrutiny of an on-looking world, reverently appealing to heaven to attest their sincerity, soundly comprehending the solemn responsibility they were about to assume, wisely measuring the terrible odds against them, your fathers, the fathers of this republic, did, most deliberately, under the inspiration of a glorious patriotism, and with a sublime faith in the great principles of justice and freedom, lay deep the corner-stone of the national superstructure, which has risen and still rises in grandeur around you.

“Of this fundamental work, this day is the anniversary. Our eyes are met with demonstrations of joyous enthusiasm. Banners and pennants wave exultingly on the breeze. The din of business, too, is hushed. Even Mammon seems to have quitted his grasp on this day. The ear-piercing fife and the stirring drum unite their accents with the ascending peal of a thousand church bells. Prayers are made, hymns are sung, and sermons are preached in honor of this day; while the quick martial tramp of a great and multitudinous nation, echoed back by all the hills, valleys and mountains of a vast continent, bespeak the occasion one of thrilling and universal interest — a nation’s jubilee.”

- Frederick Douglass

[Ken Ham @aigkenham]

Why haven’t aliens visited earth yet?

Well, I recently saw an article that gave three reasons why extraterrestrial visits might not be occurring. I’ll share those with you, and then I’ll offer a reason of my own.

According to the article, “a third of the public believes aliens are here” and “what we know about the universe suggests aliens may exist” (despite there being absolutely no evidence that aliens do, in fact, exist). So why aren’t little green men making an appearance? Well, the author gives three reasons.

https://t.co/1sB80bwogm is just too big, and it would take way too long for any aliens to reach us. Even if travel at the speed of light were possible, the phenomenon of time dilation means time would move slower for the aliens on their lightning-fast spacecraft, so interstellar travel would make them “time exiles” on their home planet, so they probably wouldn’t make the trip.

https://t.co/AQRIIDmvDL would take too much fuel. The energy requirements for such a trip are just too vast, making it basically impossible.

3.Our atmosphere and environmental conditions could be toxic to alien life. After all, who knows how they evolved? Maybe oxygen is corrosive to them and life-sustaining to us.

So it’s not that aliens don’t exist, argues this article, it’s just that it’s unlikely they’d visit us—but if we don’t look for them, we won’t ever find them and we won’t ever know! That’s the logic that ends the article, anyway.

But here’s my reason for why aliens haven’t yet sent spaceships to earth: They don’t exist. That’s right! We haven’t had extraterrestrial visitors because there aren’t any out there to make the trip!

Why do I say this? Well, because I have a different starting point. The majority of those who believe in aliens have an evolutionary worldview. In that view, life evolved on earth, so given enough time, life must’ve evolved somewhere else too. We aren’t unique; we aren’t special—so it must be fairly easy, given enough time, to make life.

But I reject that worldview because I start with God’s Word. According to God’s Word, God created life, formed earth to be inhabited, and created the heavens as markers of times and seasons and to vividly display his glorious handiwork. It’s earth that is the focus of God’s attention, and it’s Adam’s race that plunged the whole cosmos into a broken, groaning state. (Think about it: If intelligent aliens exist, they didn’t sin in Adam. They aren’t related to the first Adam, so they can’t be saved by the last Adam, and yet they suffer the effects of the curse because all of creation is groaning, as Romans 8:22 says.) It’s to earth that God sent his Son to redeem a fallen humanity.

From a biblical-worldview perspective, intelligent aliens don’t exist, and it’s highly unlikely that other lifeforms exist out in the universe. People desperately want aliens to exist so they can know they aren’t alone and that there’s something else out there. But there is someone else out there—the Creator God. And he created this earth, has miraculously moved throughout history, and visited earth himself in the person of his Son, Jesus Christ, who died the death we deserve, rose from the grave, and offers eternal life with him to all who will repent and believe.

You don’t need aliens to know you’re not alone—God has given you his Word and the offer of himself!

Remember:

“The heavens are the heavens of Yahweh,
But the earth He has given to the sons of men” (Psalm 115:16).

[Frank Turek @DrFrankTurek]

The Christian worldview is the only worldview that can justify and will maintain the human rights and freedoms upon which our nation was founded 250 years ago today. Islam won’t (sharia law), Hinduism won’t (caste system), Atheism won’t (no one is higher than the dictator, which led to 100 million murdered by atheistic regimes in the 20th Century).

Those other worldviews do not believe,“that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

Our founders knew that rights can only come from God—not governments—but that good governments are supposed to secure those rights. That’s what Christianity teaches.

Reflecting back on the founding of our country, John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson in 1813, “The general Principles on which the Fathers achieved Independence, where the only Principles in which that beautiful Assembly of young Gentlemen could Unite. . . And what were these general Principles? I answer, the general Principles of Christianity. . . ”

So whether you are a Christian or not, you should appreciate the principles that come from Christianity, including inalienable rights, and that governments are temporary institutions that are to protect the lives and liberties of beings that are eternal and made in the image of God—you and me.

[Josh Howerton @howertonjosh]

I simply cannot believe that I had NEVER learned this in a textbook or anywhere else. You're watching me hear it from @TimDavidBarton for the first time.

This seems like a pretty big deal.

[☕️ Coffee & Covid News 🇺🇸 @jchilders98]

☕️UN-INTELLIGENT ☙ Thursday, July 2, 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS🦠

The intelligence community is terrified of DNI Bill Pulte's "master list" of spies. But Trump just gave him carte blanche to declassify whatever he wants. Tick, tock. Plus MUCH MORE.

https://t.co/AXY2OSDX90

[Josh Howerton @howertonjosh]

I'm going to read the FIRST prayer delivered to the Continental Congress and it's going to blow your mind.

Why have they fought so hard to erase this part of our history. I'm glad you asked 👇

[Josh Howerton @howertonjosh]

Things like this matter, because they change the cultural conditions we hand our children, grandchildren, and the future church.

[☕️ Coffee & Covid News 🇺🇸 @jchilders98]

☕️INTELLIGENCE ☙ Tuesday, June 23, 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS🦠

The final boss battle with the deep state has begun. "Mass layoffs" for intelligence, new disclosures, and more.

https://t.co/BhKzjgXQkQ

[Shane Pruitt @shane_pruitt78]

Believing there is a "higher power" is not the same thing as being saved through the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and having the Holy Spirit of God living inside of you.

"even the demons believe & tremble (James 2:19).”

[M.A. Rothman @MichaelARothman]

𝐉𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐈𝐀𝐍 𝐌𝐈𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐄𝐋𝐒: 𝐈 𝐔𝐒𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐎 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐊 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐂𝐑𝐀𝐙𝐘 𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐅𝐑𝐀𝐔𝐃 — 𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐀 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐃 𝐇𝐈𝐌 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓

“𝘐 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘱 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘶𝘨𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 2020 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘸, 𝘐’𝘮 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 — 𝘐’𝘮 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦.”

Jillian Michaels is not a MAGA voter. She spent years in celebrity circles openly skeptical of Trump — the kind of person who would have called the “stolen election” narrative paranoid. But she appeared on a show this week and said something her audience won’t easily forget: California changed her mind.

This isn’t a hunch. 𝐒𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝, 𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝, 𝐨𝐧-𝐭𝐡𝐞-𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐬 to what California elections actually are. Not what they look like — what they fundamentally are. Her framing: “𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘭𝘢𝘸, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 — 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘭𝘶𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘵.”

The part that should stop every voter cold: 𝐧𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐢𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥. That’s the trap. You can’t fight in court what has been written into statute. You can’t call fraud what has been legalized. Michaels gave 30 million Californians a specific gift: “𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢 𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘰𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘰𝘳𝘺, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘥, 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘪𝘵.”

Her close: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯’𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘤𝘢𝘯’𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘬 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘺.” And her verdict on Trump: 𝐢𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐮𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐫 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬. She wasn’t speaking from ideology. She was speaking from arithmetic.

𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐚 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐥𝐮𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐭 — 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐉𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐌𝐢𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐞𝐥𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠.

[Ken Ham @aigkenham]

Well, that’s a new one!

Over the years, I’ve heard atheists claim over and over that young-earth creationists are “science deniers” who believe in a flat earth. And I recently heard this kind of claim again—but this time it wasn’t from an atheist. The claim was from the well-known Christian theologian and apologist William Lane Craig, who denies a literal Genesis, instead believing in evolution and millions of years.

Yes, he really compared believing what the Bible clearly teaches about Genesis to believing in a flat earth (something the Bible doesn’t teach and that denies observational science). But William Lane Craig has a problem—he doesn’t really understand science! And he refuses to take God at his Word in Genesis.

Sadly, William Lane Craig has been impacted by the religion of naturalism (which is atheism), and he’s added that into the Bible. It’s compromise on the truth of Scripture, and this compromise has major problems (such as putting death and suffering before man’s sin—a direct contradiction of Scripture).

Instead of trusting the words of men who don’t know everything, weren’t there, and often make mistakes, we must start with the Word of the God who knows everything, who has always been there, and who has never made a mistake.

William Lane Craig needs to do that!

[Cynical Publius @CynicalPublius]

Think of it this way.

You committed a felony, got convicted, did your time and now you are free again and can live free in society, but your state has a law that says you can't vote because you lost that privilege.

Corollary:

You got an SS Totenkopf tattoo on your chest, wore it for years, covered it up when people found out, you are allowed to live free in society, but that tattoo should forever bar you from serving in a public office in the USA.

Same concept, Graham Platner.

[M.A. Rothman @MichaelARothman]

𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐎𝐍 𝐆𝐈𝐋𝐋: 𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐂𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐒 𝐍𝐄𝐄𝐃𝐄𝐃 𝐒𝐋𝐀𝐕𝐄𝐒 𝐓𝐎 𝐏𝐈𝐂𝐊 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐓𝐎𝐍 — 𝐍𝐎𝐖 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐘 𝐍𝐄𝐄𝐃 𝐌𝐈𝐆𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐒 𝐓𝐎 𝐏𝐈𝐂𝐊 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐀𝐕𝐎𝐂𝐀𝐃𝐎𝐒

“160 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘰, 𝘋𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘴, 𝘪𝘧 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯’𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺, 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘱𝘪𝘤𝘬 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘰𝘯? 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘪𝘴, 𝘪𝘧 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯’𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘴 𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘱𝘪𝘤𝘬 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘴? 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘷𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘥.”

Republican Rep. Brandon Gill of Texas took the House floor and said what the media refuses to: 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐭 𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲. Both eras, the same logic: economic necessity demands a captive, low-cost labor class — and if you oppose it, you’re standing in the way of prosperity.

Gill didn’t limit the comparison to the rhetorical. 𝐇𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐬 𝐦𝐢𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐬: 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 “𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐟 𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐫.” Workers with no political rights, no wage protections, no pathway that isn’t controlled by the same corporate and political interests who profit from their presence. That’s the economic function they’re actually serving, and that’s the function the Democrat Party is defending.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐭 𝐠𝐨𝐚𝐥, 𝐆𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐫, 𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧. When Democrats say we need millions of unvetted illegal aliens, they’re simultaneously admitting their intent is to undercut American workers. “𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘱 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳.” A congressman said that. On the record. In the United States House of Representatives.

The parallel the left insists you can’t make — slavery as agricultural labor extraction, mass migration as agricultural labor extraction — Gill made it anyway, plainly, with no hedging. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝. 𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐦𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐩.

[Ari Fleischer @AriFleischer]

If you paint a swastika on a school, it’s a crime. You will be investigated, arrested, sentenced and fined.

If you put something similar on your chest, you can become a Democrat Senator and the D party will give you millions of dollars.

The modern-day D party is a disaster.

[Divinely Designed @DivinelyDesined]

Which one evolved first?

Male or female?

Evolution: "They just co-evolved gradually somehow."

Ya....ok.

Biological sex is proof that Life is created.

Two coordinated systems with entirely different anatomy.

Neither functions without the other.

Without both, Life ends.

So which half evolved first?

How many bajillions of years did that half have to wait around for the second half to get the right mutations?

Evolution cannot explain male & female.

Because Life was Created:
"Male and female God created them."

[Ken Ham @aigkenham]

Believing in a young earth won’t ultimately affect your salvation, but it sure does affect how you approach Scripture.

[Shane Pruitt @shane_pruitt78]

When the church compromises it's biblical convictions to 'become more relevant'...

It stops being relevant.

[🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 @Real_RobN]

Mark it.

“Ladies and gentlemen, you will not hear a better argument for the President of the United States than those five minutes and twenty-five seconds right here:

Cut it. Mark it. Drop it in.

Are you a Leftist?
Are you a Communist?
Are you a Marxist?
Are you super Right-wing? Doesn’t matter.

You can’t disagree with that. That is the best argument you will ever hear—condensed, distilled, like proof alcohol—into why Charlie Kirk believes in this President.”

[Sassafrass84 @Sassafrass_84]

Accurate. 💯