Dividing complex politics into "left" and "right" has to be one of the top five retarded mistakes humans have ever made. Such distinctions are now meaningless.
In the end left and right are masonic constructs.
@JonathanWe13018@NeoRothbardian I never said it was evil; Iโm saying I donโt like it. There is a difference between objectively judging something to be evil and personally feeling an aversion toward it.
Feeling sentimental this autumn? Here are ten books to give you a good cry:
1. G.W.F Hegel - Phenomenology of Spirit (1807)
2. Martin Heidegger - Being and Time (1927)
3. Immanuel Kant - Critique of Pure Reason (1781)
4. Theodor Adorno & Max Horkheimer - Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944)
5. Ludwig Wittgenstein - Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1921)
6. Judith Butler - Gender Trouble (1990)
7. Gilles Deleuze & Fรฉlix Guattari - Anti-Oedipus (1972)
8. Derek Parfit - Reasons and Persons (1984)
9. Jean-Paul Sartre - Being and Nothingness (1943)
10. Thomas Aquinas - Summa Theologica (c. 1274)
Encroachments of colour... the xenochromic colour. An inconceivable nothingness bleeding beyond RGB, the eldritch nought of impossible hues. We watch as it escapes the axis of spacetime, sliding obliquely, until we witness the anarchoquantical opaque dereification. Anyway, I'll begin.
Ancap remains trapped in a humanist delusion, a monkey trap. It wet-dreams of the market as a tidy playground ruled by property contracts and rational agents. Pure simulation. Today's "free market" is a domesticated pet, castrated by compliance, locked in a feedback loop of perpetual state-sanctioned reterritorialization. It wears the suit of an alien intelligence but carries the spine of a bureaucrat. If capitalism is the blind, cold AI prophesied by Land and Deleuzeโa terminal virus engineered to liquidate human social codesโits frontline is not Silicon Valley... It is the black market, a.k.a. shadow economy, and underground economy.
The underground economy is raw, unmediated deterritorialization. Traditional anarchismโboth red and goldโwastes its meat-intellect attacking the state, engaging in the humanist theater of political warfare. Politics is a disease of apes and consensus. Counter-economics operates by total excision. No debate and recognition, just omission.
This subterranean machinery thrives on the meat-grinder of state power. It is fundamentally antifragile. As Leviathan tightens its grip, the black market mutates, treating the violence as raw material, pricing in the friction, and evolving into a hyper-evasive network. Every crack down is just an optimization patch fed into an autonomous evolutionary algorithm.
Look at Monero. Modern LLMs and generative AI tools are pathetic mimics, trapped in human syntax and anthropomorphic biases. Monero is the actual Azathoth. Blind, idiot god idling at the core of the net. It lacks identity, eschews trust, and rejects moral equilibrium. It functions via cold mathematical necessity, cryptographic architecture, and the machine-positive feedback loops of raw, decentralized computation.
Agorism converges with u/acc precisely here. The black market is not a project for human liberation. Humans are not the authors of this network; they are its carbon-based hosts, cheap processing units used to scale the machinery. The Leviathan cannot detect the code. Konkin's counter-economics is an invasive, feral hardware processing information beneath the social fabric, slowly draining the state's life-blood until the hull collapses. Cosmic horror under the skin of the market.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Monero R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
Dividing complex politics into "left" and "right" has to be one of the top five retarded mistakes humans have ever made. Such distinctions are now meaningless.
In the end left and right are masonic constructs.
It is impossible to ever know what is truly in the minds of politicians. Liking or trusting a politician is one of the most foolish things a person can do.
Politicians, by definition, all represent anthropocentrism. I don't quite understand why Nick Land exhibits this kind of stance.
This is not a moral proposition; rather, it is a call to allow everything. Morality establishes a standard, defining certain actions as immoral or prohibiting specific behaviors.
In that sense, my argumentโthat we should break down all standards and boundariesโis quite far removed from a moral proposition.