🚨 CNN MELTDOWN: Trump releasing new declassified intel on China’s election interference and voting machine vulnerabilities and the media is PANICKING!
They’ve spent years calling it “baseless” and “conspiracy,” but now suddenly freak out when the President provides evidence and demands real integrity.
Transparency isn’t damage to democracy, hiding it is. Americans deserve the full truth, not CNN spin.
@CAgovernor You're a liar and a moron @CAgovernor . Why don't you report the real numbers? Homelessness is still up 12.6% in California since 2019. Take that feather you just stuck in your cap and shove it in your bung where it belongs.
#democratliar#incompetentpoliticians
@freep No @freep, this is where media lies, and biased/politicized reporting leads. You spread hate, propaganda, and misreport news which gets people riled up and feeling empowered to wrongfully intervene in lawful police actions. YOU @freep are the problem here, and it's disgusting!
@freep Perhaps she shouldn’t have used her vehicle as a weapon to run over an agent… very sad that she put her own selfish interests before her childrens. She was a mother who thought it was ok to try and kill an ICE agent with her car. You cannot prove that wrong. Nice try though.
This is preposterous.
First of all, she's not waving the officers through and has no right to do so even if she were. She is waving another car through, before the officers approach her car.
Second, the officers are not randomly searching her, they are approaching her vehicle because she is violating the law: namely, she is obstructing a lawful enforcement operation. You're not allowed to walk up to or drive up to people who are enforcing the law to make it harder for them to do their jobs.
Third, this defense attorney is drawing a meaningless distinction between an ICE officer and a "real police officer." Again, you're not allowed to interrupt a lawful enforcement operation, which is exactly what this woman was doing.
Fourth, the officer didn't discharge his weapon to prevent her from fleeing. When he discharged his weapon, she had pointed the vehicle at him and pressed the gas. He discharged his weapon in self defense, and other angles of the video show the woman *clearly* hit the officer with her car while accelerating.
The gaslighting is off the charts and I'm having none of it. This guy was doing his job. She tried to stop him from doing his job. When he approached her car, she tried to hit him.
A tragedy? Absolutely. But a tragedy that falls on this woman and all of the radicals who teach people that immigration is the one type of law that rioters are allowed to interfere with.
Ok, let's take it from the top
>“I’m neutral / watched it 10 times.”
No you aren't, you literally attack conservatives SPECIFICALLY at the end of your post.
>“Officers instigated.”
Approaching someone isn’t “instigating,” it’s what federal agents do, especially to someone who has been interfering with their work, which multiple witnesses have said so far.
>“ICE has no authority over a U.S. citizen.”
This is just factually idiotic. Federal agents can detain/arrest citizens in plenty of situations,.
>“Unless harboring… an undocumented”
Very cute trick there, you skip over every other possible basis (obstruction, assault, resisting) by announcing it “not a contention.”
>“Masked men with no authority → she had every right to escape.”
Again, clearly idiotic. The woman knew they were ICE, that's WHY SHE WAS THERE. If they’re identifiable as law enforcement, you don’t get to ignore them or hit them with your car.
>“Wheel turned right = clearly trying not to hit anyone.”
She clearly DID hit the officer in the video.
>“Officer had time to step aside.”
This is sheltered bullshit and the legal standard isn’t your slow-mo replay from the laptop... the officer clearly felt threatened by her actions to accelerate into him and hit him.
>“Deadly force can’t be used to prevent escape.”
If a reasonable officer perceives an imminent deadly threat (yes, cars can be that), the analysis changes. You conveniently ignore that.
>“She was escaping a perceived threat, not trying to kill.”
Again: you don’t know that. You’re asserting motive because your whole argument needs it.
>“ICE had no authority, so it’s more inexcusable.”
We already disproved this.
>“Conservatives are unprincipled and lost for disagreeing.”
...and now you give yourself away, just pretending to not have a political dog in the hunt but you couldn't help yourself could you?
Classic leftist pretending... until they just can't, always.
@WadeFink@DuncanSmithNBA The @NFL finds new and inventive ways of becoming more and more of a joke weekly. How is the richest sport in the US so horrible in its officiating? I'm going to have to start watching pro wrestling because it is so much more real than the @NFL . A complete joke!!!
#NFLisAJoke
Imagine the NFL calling from New York to take away a Lions touchdown at Arrowhead because of a procedural penalty that wasn’t seen by the referees but not calling to eject DK Metcalf FOR PUNCHING A FAN IN THE FUCKING FACE.