@young_kox@itskenadi@Anton_uol@Kimaiyo ππyou have to be joking. Was there anything more valuable to them than literally the WHITE HIGHLANDS from Kiambu, Nyeri to Uasin Gishu! Tuendee school fees tupige sherehe. Utakuwaje nongwe tangu utotoni na bado as an adult with 32 teeth?
@ChampionLigma@OgbeniDemola@grok Not even an original thought. You didn't have legs to stand on when presented with facts and testimonies of a lived experience. Not a link or pic to dispute them bar talking about cucks like you're projecting. This is so disappointing of you mr IQ. So cheers to U and you go, girl
@africanews0002@realpillnuke I could show you other train routes esp the Nairobi Network and roads but it would be pointless. You have other things you should be focusing on. It's not even banter anymore.
Warning: graphic content
@MeranSays Huyu bei yake ilifika. Look at the undertones of his "criticism" of this govt nowadays. Jamaa haelewi what guerilla warfare is and it's impacts. He was quoting books that he most probably hasn't read to try and legitimize his weird takes.
It's also a misapprehension of irregular warfare in terms of psychology, strategy, tactics and objectives. I can assure you that Kimuzi is no warrio and would lose any war within 2 hours.
Guerrilla warfare is never about defeating the government in some big set-piece battle somewhere on some battlefield. The guerrilla actually spends most of his time rejecting battle and only fighting when conditions are favourable for him.
The guerrilla:
- fights to drive the costs of the war high, damage the enemy's economic base and force him to see that negotiation or even departure is cheaper than continuing. The Mau Mau did this very well by destroying livestock, executing labour as collaborators, forcing the colonial government to mobilise and sustain 70,000 troops spending 6 million kilos of bombs which increased so significantly that the colony was bankrupt by 1960.
- out-compete the enemy by alienating it from the population, turning it into an enemy of the people (always through high-handedness) and turning the entire population into an enemy while simultaneously turning it into the guerrillas' allies, supporters, source of sustainment and source of fighters. Mau Mau did this very well.
-damage the enemy's reputation globally. As the regime loses economically, in the mountains and in the local population, it starts lashing out, and this turns it into a global pariah. This impacts its economy; see South Africa and the sanctions and therefore its ability to conduct the war. No conventional army can fight guerrillas for years and retain its reputation. The war is always brutal.
- damage the enemy's support for the war in its own home base. In these types of wars, regimes recruit from supportive communities and this support dwindles as the bodies start coming back.
Not only as the Mau Mau war a success it was also a template for other guerrillas including in Malaysia and Southern Africa.
@young_kox@itskenadi@Anton_uol@Kimaiyo Mbona ume ignore swali yangu ya why do you think since Hiroshima and Nagasaki, no other has ever been dropped? Ati wangetaka... Reasoning yako ni ya utoto sana.
@young_kox@itskenadi@Anton_uol@Kimaiyo Is that why the US with their stockpile of nuclear weapons and greatest army in the world lost to Vietnamese farmers?π shida ya 527 gang ni kuongea about topics you're out of your depth.
@young_kox@itskenadi@Anton_uol@Kimaiyo How is testing their 1st atomic bomb in 1952=to having an atomic bomb?π€¦πΎ umesoma part imesema Britain did not have a stockpile of deployable nuclear weapons or the specialized strategic bombers ready to drop them. They were decades behind the US and USSR in weapon production?
It's also a misapprehension of irregular warfare in terms of psychology, strategy, tactics and objectives. I can assure you that Kimuzi is no warrio and would lose any war within 2 hours.
Guerrilla warfare is never about defeating the government in some big set-piece battle somewhere on some battlefield. The guerrilla actually spends most of his time rejecting battle and only fighting when conditions are favourable for him.
The guerrilla:
- fights to drive the costs of the war high, damage the enemy's economic base and force him to see that negotiation or even departure is cheaper than continuing. The Mau Mau did this very well by destroying livestock, executing labour as collaborators, forcing the colonial government to mobilise and sustain 70,000 troops spending 6 million kilos of bombs which increased so significantly that the colony was bankrupt by 1960.
- out-compete the enemy by alienating it from the population, turning it into an enemy of the people (always through high-handedness) and turning the entire population into an enemy while simultaneously turning it into the guerrillas' allies, supporters, source of sustainment and source of fighters. Mau Mau did this very well.
-damage the enemy's reputation globally. As the regime loses economically, in the mountains and in the local population, it starts lashing out, and this turns it into a global pariah. This impacts its economy; see South Africa and the sanctions and therefore its ability to conduct the war. No conventional army can fight guerrillas for years and retain its reputation. The war is always brutal.
- damage the enemy's support for the war in its own home base. In these types of wars, regimes recruit from supportive communities and this support dwindles as the bodies start coming back.
Not only as the Mau Mau war a success it was also a template for other guerrillas including in Malaysia and Southern Africa.
@Kimaiyo Zero facts hapa. Unafail kuunderstand guerrilla warfare & impacts. Guerrillas don't win by capturing territory; they win by bleeding the enemy financially. Britain wanted to keep Kenya after WW2, but Mau Mau made it an economic liability, not an asset. Tunakuona tu gig worker.
It's also a misapprehension of irregular warfare in terms of psychology, strategy, tactics and objectives. I can assure you that Kimuzi is no warrio and would lose any war within 2 hours.
Guerrilla warfare is never about defeating the government in some big set-piece battle somewhere on some battlefield. The guerrilla actually spends most of his time rejecting battle and only fighting when conditions are favourable for him.
The guerrilla:
- fights to drive the costs of the war high, damage the enemy's economic base and force him to see that negotiation or even departure is cheaper than continuing. The Mau Mau did this very well by destroying livestock, executing labour as collaborators, forcing the colonial government to mobilise and sustain 70,000 troops spending 6 million kilos of bombs which increased so significantly that the colony was bankrupt by 1960.
- out-compete the enemy by alienating it from the population, turning it into an enemy of the people (always through high-handedness) and turning the entire population into an enemy while simultaneously turning it into the guerrillas' allies, supporters, source of sustainment and source of fighters. Mau Mau did this very well.
-damage the enemy's reputation globally. As the regime loses economically, in the mountains and in the local population, it starts lashing out, and this turns it into a global pariah. This impacts its economy; see South Africa and the sanctions and therefore its ability to conduct the war. No conventional army can fight guerrillas for years and retain its reputation. The war is always brutal.
- damage the enemy's support for the war in its own home base. In these types of wars, regimes recruit from supportive communities and this support dwindles as the bodies start coming back.
Not only as the Mau Mau war a success it was also a template for other guerrillas including in Malaysia and Southern Africa.
People fail to appreciate that there was the Metropole and the Settlers in Kenya. London had indeed made peace with independence, the settlers in Kenya had not. Mau Mau made it clear to the settlers that they couldn't hope to control Kenya without backing from the UK Government.
@young_kox@itskenadi@Anton_uol@Kimaiyo Unsound kama mtoto mjinga. Ati atomic bomb. Si utuambie vile babako ni 1st body pia.π€¦πΎ ushaijiuliza why the only country that has ever dropped one never dropped another even in Vietnam, Iraq 1, Afghanistan? Do you even know when Britain tested their 1st AB?
The Mau Mau were one of the most significant anti-colonial movements in Africa. The Mau Mau influenced Pan-Africanists throughout the Diaspora including Malcolm X and the Rastas in Jamaica. This is an example of how interconnected our struggles have been.
@AfroPastNow@noweaponss@luxor254 They ask for proof and your response is that they were not born in the 60s?π Bravo! At least pay for the β οΈ so that you can be of use.
https://t.co/iLU5EuqPPN
@ChampionLigma@OgbeniDemola@grok This has become very underwhelming. Your claims of high intelligence are completely contradicted by the sheer lack of evidence in your responses. Iβve seen more intellectual depth in a shallow puddle. Good work on the rageπ£.ππΎ
@ChampionLigma@OgbeniDemola@grok π I see. So why dont you want to leave Africa and it's resources? After all, it "cannot evolve", according to mr high IQ.
@SWNatGT@Kaysharichh π€¦πΎyou think we don't know that there are good white people? We don't know that a few bad white people also do bad to good white people? The only help we want is for you to tell your bad people to leave us alone. Open the BBC link. Look up Kenyas role in gen z protests. We got us!
@SWNatGT@Kaysharichh Listen to yourself. We are telling you where the problem is. We are asking the majority good white people to tell the bad ones to get out of Africa and FREE us. We know our problems. We got us. But you only see you, ever THE victim. 0 accountability.π€¦πΎ https://t.co/jmzqfjXeN5