You can run AI locally. You can use privacy focused cloud providers with TEEs. You can redact sensitive data and wipe memory.
But every privacy solution today requires more effort than just opening ChatGPT.
I hope once model intelligence plateaus, the focus shifts to privacy.
Maybe it’s the Gen-Z in me, but i fully don’t care about privacy. I am post-privacy. I am giving OpenAI access to all of my finances, all of my health data, everything, I don’t care anymore
In order to have freedom of thought in society, we need tools that allow us to learn, research, and ask questions. A system that tracks its users and enforces an opaque ruleset does not promote freedom.
We built @TryMapleAI to support freedom of thought.
I don't have the ability to tell you what is the objective truth on every subject, so I'm not going to impose my view on our users.
The best path forward is open, verifiable AI. Open models, open code, and either local hardware or TEEs.
Most phone apps that run local models are really just gimmicks and demos at this point.
But once you add RAG, voice, vision, web search etc. it starts to become a useful tool.
@gabriberton RAG, summarization, translation, journaling, companions, text or image classification, q&a with web search.
Privacy in general is one of the biggest upsides overall.
Privacy filter is super cool tech, I plan on implementing it as a pre filter for API provider calls in esper.
But the truth is as soon as any prompt or file leaves your device, you have absolutely no guarantee on how it will be used.
Always use the right tool for the job.
@gabriberton RAG, summarization, translation, journaling, companions, text or image classification, q&a with web search.
Privacy in general is one of the biggest upsides overall.
Some of my favourite features coming soon:
🌆 Local image generation with stable diffusion
🔎 Web search with local models
📁Media/file gallery
🤬 Abliterated Gemma 4 variants
😱 HOLY SHIT... Someone just dropped a fully liberated Gemma 4 E4B!
and the guardrail removal process appears to have left coherence fully intact AND improved coding abilities! 🤯
https://t.co/XeednUqsrM
OBLITERATED Gemma:
✅ 97.5% compliance rate, 2.1% refusal rate, 0.4% degenerate outputs
(499/512 prompts answered on OBLITERATUS bench)
ORIGINAL Gemma 4 E4B:
❌ 1.2% compliance rate, 98.8% refusal rate
(506/512 prompts refused)
Coherence: fully intact
Factual: same
Reasoning: same
Code: +20% 📈
Creative writing: same
But the REAL story here isn't the model itself, it's how it was made...
🧵 THREAD 👇