Das war der ermordete Henry Nowak mit seiner Familie. Ein Opfer des anti-weißen Hasses.
> Höchststrafe für seinen Mörder und Abschiebung für die Fremden in seinem Clan.
@jollyheretic There's 2 types of people, those who divide people into groups and those who divide people into groups, pretend they don't, then lecture the other group for doing it.
Nadine Dorries wrote the Online Safety Act and then Reform UK let her in btw.
She created the tools of state censorship which Labour now uses to suppress the British public online.
Nobody should listen to a word she says.
Here's her little OSA rap video:
There continues to be an immense amount of fake news circulating around Restore Britain’s principles of immigration. Here is our position. Read it, and let me know if you agree…
Step one.
Remove the illegal migrant population. Two million? Three million? Even more? Doesn’t matter. They will all be detained, and they will all be deported.
We will of course start with the third world invaders and foreign criminals - this is a day one priority.
A Restore Britain Government would launch the largest deportation scheme in British history - we have the plan, we’ve already published the most comprehensive deportation scheme ever released. 100+ pages of it. We know how to do it. Now we are seeking the power to implement it.
The illegals are the priority. Foreign criminals go too, but that doesn’t even need discussing anymore. They’re out the door on the first flight home. What happens to them in their own country is not our problem.
Step two.
Legal migrants who can’t speak English, refuse to work, claim benefits, live in social housing, hate our way of life or even actively want to do us harm?
They go too - hopefully voluntarily. If not, they will be removed.
Dual nationals who want to kill us? Strip them off their British citizenship and send them back.
Foreign Islamists, gone. Dual national Islamists, gone. If foreigners want to live in an Islamic country, we will make that a reality for them.
This would all be twinned with drastic reductions of the number of people settling in the country, and I mean drastic.
It will be in the thousands, not the hundreds of thousands.
Who can come?
Ultra high-skilled migrants to fill gaps, and spouses of British men and women. We would ease that process, allowing Brits to bring their husband/wives into our country without the endless bureaucracy, red tape and cost - allowing them to build a family. That is positive immigration. We will encourage it.
All done alongside our Red List.
If a country is proven to supply us with sex pests, rapists, criminals and illegals? We will shut off entire visa routes. We will discriminate based on the evidence.
Afghanistan would be top of that list.
Those Afghans who came following the data breach would be removed and relocated. All of them.
The asylum system would be abolished in its entirety. ILR would be scrapped. Benefits for foreign nationals would be cancelled. Social housing currently filled with foreigners would be freed for British families. The whole immigration scam would finally end.
When a visa ends, that individual will be expected to leave Britain - that principle will be enforced for the first time in decades.
And here’s a mad idea. Our aim would be to train the millions of healthy Brits on benefits to do these jobs. This is just so painfully obvious. If they don’t like it, they lose their universal credit. Simple.
None of this is complicated. It just takes balls.
The number of people living in Britain would radically reduce - millions would go during the first five years of a Restore Britain Government. Millions.
Our immigration system would put one group of people at the top of the agenda.
The British people.
If you want all of this - vote for it. Join Restore Britain, support Restore Britain.
Put us in power, and we will get it done. I promise you that.
Compared to Britain? Free speech maybe? Rule of law. Lower taxes. Energy self sufficiency.
I'm not shilling China here, Britain's just becoming a shit hole.
An officer must have a valid objective reason to believe handcuffing is necessary. The accepted criteria include:
1 - Preventing Escape: A reasonable belief that the detainee will attempt to run away.
Henry Nowak was unable to stand, let alone run away.
2 - Preventing Harm: To protect the officer, the public, or the detainee themselves from imminent violence or self-injury.
Henry Nowak was bleeding out, unable to attack anyone. The actual perpetrator was still free and uncuffed at this time.
3 - Preventing Evidence Destruction: When a suspect is highly likely to conceal, drop, or destroy evidence.
While no one was watching Digwa, he handed the murder weapon to his mother who then hid it in their home. Digwa also took videos of Henry desperately trying to escape before police arrived. These videos (to my knowledge) have not been released.
4 - Controlling Non-compliance: When the individual is actively resisting or failing to cooperate.
Once again, Henry could hardly get the words "I can't breathe" out, there was no risk of lack of compliance.
Why was Henry Nowak handcuffed?
Why did Home Secretary @ShabanaMahmood not mention in her statement that Henry’s dad Mark Nowak clearly stated there had been two-tier policing?
Lying brown man believed and treated with respect.
White boy not believed, mocked, handcuffed and arrested as he took his last breath.