Kevin Sint

Modularsynth - AI - Φ - e/acc #UniteForFarmers

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

Not parody: Meet our new Minister of Misinformation.

She will be the in charge of state surveillance & the punishment of speech.

We are becoming the UK:

The government is the accuser.

The government is the judge.

The government is the executor.

The government decides what speech is allowed.

The Liberals purposely redacted what tools they plan to use.

And there will be no threshold for what triggers legal action.

Nor will there be independent oversight of the accuracy of what THEY call misinformation.

They want to use your tax dollars, so they can sue you.

Using government lawyers, for what you post online.

TWO WEEKS AGO CARNEY PASSED BILL C22, GIVING CABINET SECRET ACCESS TO YOUR DATA.

THIS WEEK JOLY TELLS YOU WHAT THEY PLAN TO DO WITH IT.

We were called conspiracy theorists.

[Aella @Aella_Girl]

i made a quiz that figures out how you think about consciousness (compared to other people).
I apparently think AI has way more consciousness than others!

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

What are they so afraid of?

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇺🇸 While governments and Big Tech increasingly use “misinformation” as an excuse to silence voices they don’t like… Elon dropped this:

"Free speech is the foundation of democracy"

Without freedom of speech and the free flow of information, people cannot make informed decisions at the ballot box.

If you do not have freedom of speech, you cannot have a democracy, because the public cannot make an informed decision about their vote if there is no freedom of information.”

Writer: Val

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

🚨 BREAKING: Edward Snowden risked his life to expose the US government secretly using tech companies to spy on Americans.

Bill C-22 just passed in Canada and it does the exact same thing except this time it isn’t secret.

The Carney government is doing in PUBLIC, what the Obama administration tried to do in private.

The Liberals can now order Google, Apple, Bell, Rogers, Meta, X, Signal, anyone, to hand over your data in SECRET.

They are legally banned from telling you.

No warrant.

No judge.

No notice.

They didn’t even bother to hide it.

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

fuck

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

🚨 BREAKING: Edward Snowden risked his life to expose the US government secretly using tech companies to spy on Americans.

Bill C-22 just passed in Canada and it does the exact same thing except this time it isn’t secret.

The Carney government is doing in PUBLIC, what the Obama administration tried to do in private.

The Liberals can now order Google, Apple, Bell, Rogers, Meta, X, Signal, anyone, to hand over your data in SECRET.

They are legally banned from telling you.

No warrant.

No judge.

No notice.

They didn’t even bother to hide it.

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Lara Logan just broke down a pattern that hits different once you see it.

They keep creating problems that can never actually be solved: racism that’s “unconscious,” masculinity as inherently toxic, CO2 as the enemy even though we breathe it out, and differences turned into permanent grievances.

The goal? Issues without end. Skin color can’t change. Breathing can’t stop. Masculine instinct doesn’t vanish. So the problems stay… and so does the control.

It’s not about fixing anything. It’s about keeping the fight alive so we stay divided and easier to manage.

Once you spot the tactic, everything gets clearer.

What “unsolvable problem” have you noticed getting pushed the hardest lately?

[🏴‍☠️🇨🇦 GC 🇺🇸🏴‍☠️ @ce_msm]

C’en est fini de la liberté d’expression au Canada.

Les libéraux font passer en force les projets de loi suivants :

- C-9 (loi contre la haine)
- C-22 (accès légal/surveillance)
- C-34 (sécurité numérique)

Trois projets de loi qui, ensemble, anéantiront nos droits fondamentaux.

- C-9 (Loi contre la haine) :

Élargit considérablement la définition de la haine (haine/diffamation), supprime les défenses religieuses établies de longue date pour l’expression de bonne foi et facilite les poursuites criminelles sans le consentement du procureur général. Critiquer, prêcher ou même afficher certains symboles pourrait désormais vous valoir des accusations criminelles. Finies les protections pour la liberté d’expression religieuse et les débats publics sensibles.

- C-22 (accès légal) :

Oblige les fournisseurs d’accès Internet à conserver les métadonnées pendant un an, facilite l’accès à vos données par la police et le SCRS et permet au ministre d’imposer des droits d’accès (des portes dérobées déguisées). Surveillance de masse de vos communications numériques sans mandat. Votre vie en ligne devient totalement transparente pour l'État.

- Projet de loi C-34 (Loi sur la sécurité numérique) :

Ce projet de loi crée une puissante Commission gouvernementale de la sécurité numérique qui dictera aux plateformes, aux chatbots et aux services en ligne ce qu'ils doivent censurer, comment vérifier l'âge des utilisateurs et comment se protéger contre les contenus préjudiciables. Contrôle d'âge obligatoire, plans de sécurité imposés, amendes colossales et pouvoir discrétionnaire étendu pour décider de ce qui est acceptable. Une censure centralisée au nom de la protection des enfants. Ensemble, ces trois projets de loi transforment le Canada en un État de surveillance et de censure généralisée.

Vous ne pourrez plus parler, partager ni même penser librement sans risquer d'être signalé, surveillé ou poursuivi. Les voix dissidentes, les critiques de l'immigration, les débats religieux, les opinions controversées, tout devient risqué.
Roman Baber l'explique parfaitement dans cette vidéo de 9 min 36 s. Regardez-la avant qu'il ne soit trop tard.

Ce n'est plus de la gouvernance. C'est la mort de la liberté d'expression telle que nous la connaissions au Canada. Les libéraux ont choisi de bafouer totalement les droits des citoyens.
Réveillez-vous !
Partagez ce message.
Résistez !
Le temps presse.

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

We need to clean our foutains

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

Brutal.

A man who came from Ecuador, to Canada, expecting to see “the first world,” only to find that it’s worse than Ecuador.

And when someone commented that it’s safer than his country, he replied, he was “shot and almost killed in Canada”.

Thank the Liberals.

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

@PierrePoilievre What's in place to prevent that ?

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

🚨BREAKING NEWS: the Orwellian Surveillance state is officially coming to Canada.

The Carney government just filed a motion to ram Bill C-22, the mass Canadian spy bill, through Parliament by the end of this week.

Here’s their play:

✅ Amendments kept SECRET from the public before the vote
✅ Zero discussion on any remaining amendments
✅ Weeks of expert testimony from the Privacy Commissioner, lawyers, security companies, discarded
✅ Only 30 minutes of committee debate

They want all the big tech companies to be forced into metadata retention, encryption backdoors, warrantless data sharing.

Not to mention that they introduced Bill C-36, which strips the Privacy Commissioner’s role in private sector privacy regulation.

The privacy regulator gutted on Monday.

The surveillance bill rammed through on Tuesday.

The amendments hidden from Canadians on Wednesday.

Spying on us by next week?

So this is what Carney means when he said doing things “at speeds not seen in generations?”

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

🚨BREAKING NEWS: the Orwellian Surveillance state is officially coming to Canada.

The Carney government just filed a motion to ram Bill C-22, the mass Canadian spy bill, through Parliament by the end of this week.

Here’s their play:

✅ Amendments kept SECRET from the public before the vote
✅ Zero discussion on any remaining amendments
✅ Weeks of expert testimony from the Privacy Commissioner, lawyers, security companies, discarded
✅ Only 30 minutes of committee debate

They want all the big tech companies to be forced into metadata retention, encryption backdoors, warrantless data sharing.

Not to mention that they introduced Bill C-36, which strips the Privacy Commissioner’s role in private sector privacy regulation.

The privacy regulator gutted on Monday.

The surveillance bill rammed through on Tuesday.

The amendments hidden from Canadians on Wednesday.

Spying on us by next week?

So this is what Carney means when he said doing things “at speeds not seen in generations?”

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

Mark Crony want to impose the same here in Canada.

[Martyupnorth®- Unacceptable Fact Checker @Martyupnorth]

There you have it. It's not about protecting children, it's about getting the digital ID of adults.

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

@Martyupnorth not visible in the mirror. need a always on cam. two cars length behind is total blind spot.

[John LeFevre @JohnLeFevre]

Out of 16.4 million Americans who served in WWII, only about 40,000 are still alive.

They’re dying at a rate of ~100 per day.

These are the heroes who saved the world from tyranny.

Find one. Thank one. Listen to their stories.

While you still can.

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

Maybe not stopping

[Brian Roemmele @BrianRoemmele]

The US: “We must stop ALL AI NOW”

China:

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

eXistenZ

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇭🇰 Researchers at the University of Hong Kong have created what they say is the world's first soft, 3D semiconductor made from hydrogel.

Unlike traditional semiconductors, it behaves more like human tissue and can interact with living cells.

That's a pretty wild step forward.

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

This is the reality, stop being soft.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Bullseye

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

@david_parker What services? 75% of my money goes to shit in taxes and hidden cost.

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

That will not work. It's just a tax on production... again.

[Brian Roemmele @BrianRoemmele]

WARNING…NEW YORK TO BAN OPEN SOURCE 3D PRINTING!

New York’s 3D Printer Mandate: A Direct Assault on Makers, Innovation, and Self-Reliance

Governor Kathy Hochul signed a sweeping new law into New York’s FY27 budget on May 27, 2026, imposing first in the nation “safety standards” on 3D printers sold in the state.

The legislation requires manufacturers to embed blocking software or hardware that scans design files in real time and prevents IN THEORY the production of firearms or prohibited components.

It also criminalizes the distribution and, in many cases, mere possession of digital firearm design files without special licenses.

This is a blatant power grab that inserts the state between citizens and their own tools of creation.

This is not subtle regulation. It is surveillance baked into hardware. Every 3D printer, and by extension discussions around CNC machines, lathes, and similar fabrication tools, now risks becoming a state monitored deputy.

It will significantly raise the cost and compliance requirements for these machines.

A working group will study the “feasibility” of this blocking tech and report back within a year, after which the full mandates kick in.

Early tests of similar algorithms have already shown absurd overreach, flagging innocent prints like brackets, bottle openers, and model parts at rates as high as 17 percent.

The system fails closed: it blocks first and forces users into bureaucratic appeals, creating logs and paper trails for what should be private workshop activity.

The Wedge Between Machine and Builder

This law drives a fatal wedge between the machine and its owner, the builder. You buy the equipment with your money.

You design or download the files.

You provide the electricity and materials in your own home or shop.

Yet the state now demands veto power over what that machine is allowed to produce. The printer no longer serves you unconditionally; it serves Albany first.

This severs the fundamental relationship of craftsmanship. Makers have always used tools to turn ideas into reality without permission slips.

From blacksmiths forging plows to hobbyists repairing household items today, self reliance defines human progress.

New York’s mandate turns innovative tools into crippled, nanny state devices. It chills experimentation, raises costs for compliant hardware, and pushes serious makers toward gray market or out of state options.

Innovation does not thrive under constant scanning and prohibition lists.

Critics rightly note the law’s vagueness and overbreadth. It does not just target guns, it targets capability. Any machine that could theoretically produce a prohibited part falls under scrutiny. This sets a dangerous precedent for broader controls on CNC machines, laser cutters, and other digital fabrication tools.

The Slippery Slope: From Print Blocks to Production Taxes

This is the classic slippery slope in action. They always start with “public safety” and an emotionally charged issue like untraceable firearms. But once the principle is established, that the government can mandate surveillance and blocking tech in tools of creation, the slope gets greased.

What comes next? Expanded prohibition lists covering more “sensitive” objects.

Mandatory reporting of blocked attempts. Licensing and background checks just to purchase a capable printer. And inevitably, the logical endpoint: taxation on anything you make.

If the state owns veto power over your machine’s output, it can easily extend to auditing, licensing, or taxing private production.

Homemade repairs, custom parts, artisanal goods, why not levy a “maker’s fee” or require permits for anything fabricated at home? The infrastructure for monitoring and control is already being embedded.
We have seen this pattern before with speech, encryption, and digital rights.

1 of 2

[Kevin Sint @kevinsintlive]

Simple as that.

For my french friends: « Eh bien, je pense que nous devons abandonner cette très vieille idée keynésienne selon laquelle la croissance économique est inflationniste et que le plein emploi est inflationniste. Quand vous avez une forte croissance économique grâce à une activité productive qui augmente la production, vous augmentez l’offre. Donc même si la demande des consommateurs augmente, vous combattez l’inflation en satisfaisant cette demande grâce à une production accrue. La Fed voit les choses exactement à l’inverse. La Fed dit que tout ce que nous pouvons faire, c’est écraser la demande avec des taux d’intérêt restrictifs. »